🔎

My Basket ()

  • 59

    answers
  • 1790

    views

Hi everyone! Could someone tell me how the candidates for community picks are picked up? Thanks!

Katerina6-
Answer »
Mrs._larkin_370

Mrs. Larkin is a trusted source on Baking.

added about 1 year ago

Hi CF. Do you mean how do you go about testing one of the community pick candidates? If so, when the candidates are announced, there is a "test this recipe" button you can click on the recipe's page.

Here's the specific wording from the most recent CP Recipe Testing page:

"When you’ve figured out which recipes are calling your name, in order to sign up, all you have to do is follow the link to that recipe’s page, and on the left-hand side, you’ll see a “Test This Recipe” button. Your job is easy: just click the button, and you’ll receive a confirmation email that officially crowns you a Food52 community tester. If for some reason you decide you cannot test, simply press the button again, and your name will be removed from the list. Act fast -- this button will disappear on the Tuesday before your testing notes are due."

Katerina6-
Culinary Flavors added about 1 year ago

Thanks Mrs. Larkin, but actually what I would like to know is how these candidates are picked up in the first place so as their recipes to be tested.

Mrs._larkin_370

Mrs. Larkin is a trusted source on Baking.

added about 1 year ago

Ah, I thought that might be what you were asking. A lot of cooks have that same question, myself included. As far as I know, there has never been a clear answer. I wonder if the editors could shed some light on this subject?

Katerina6-
Culinary Flavors added about 1 year ago

Yes Mrs. Larkin, I was puzzled myself. In the recent contest there were over 100 submissions but only 20 were picked up and I was wondering on which criteria! Perhaps indeed the editors of this site can answer this question or anybody else who knows that.

Gator_cake

hardlikearmour is a trusted home cook.

added about 1 year ago

They did a video of the contest process about a year and a half ago. When the contest closes they divide up the recipes to read through. Then they chose the recipes that interest them, and everyone who's helping to chose recipes votes on them. They pick the ones that get the most votes, and put them up for testing. If you'd like to watch the video: http://food52.com/blog...

Katerina6-
Culinary Flavors added about 1 year ago

Thank you very much for your reply hardlikearmour. It seems to me that it is not a very community oriented procedure. I submitted a recipe in one contest, but if my recipe is not judged by the community from the very beginning to the end, I don't think I will ever participate again! Thanks again for clarifying it to me!

LLStone added about 1 year ago

Please keep submitting! I love perusing all the recipes, and try many of them. There are tons of gems that aren't winners or Community Picks, but I love having all the recipes 'at the ready' when I do a search.

Jampro
Bevi added about 1 year ago
Voted the Best Answer!

I think a more appropriate name for a Community Pick is "Editor's Pick", as they were called previously. "Community Pick" does seem to be a misnomer if those recipes nominated are indeed selected by the editors.

Zester_003

pierino is a trusted source on General Cooking and Tough Love.

added about 1 year ago

Please remember that this is an editorial process for a publication; a publication which won a Beard award last year. I give the editors credit for narrowing it down---it's impossible to test every single recipe each week. If you put up 120 recipes for testing at most 10 would actually tested. I think Communnity Pick is still valid before the finalists are selected by the commmunity as a whole.

Zester_003

pierino is a trusted source on General Cooking and Tough Love.

added about 1 year ago

Here's another thought on the editorial process; head notes matter. So before you go off and sulk consider that component to be as important as your recipe.

Massimo's_deck_reflection_10_27_13
lapadia added about 1 year ago

Dear Pierino, Please, watch your words, nobody is “sulking.” A valid question was originally asked, which in turn, opened up a valid and heartfelt conversation; a subject matter that has been asked and talked about by our fellow Food52 peers many times over…let’s give some respect for all opinions and thoughts. Thank you.

Zester_003

pierino is a trusted source on General Cooking and Tough Love.

added about 1 year ago

Excuse me lapadia, but I was offering sound advice on the editorial process. The person who posed the question did however say, but if my recipe is not judged by the community from the very beginning to the end, I don't think I will ever participate again" Sulk?

Massimo's_deck_reflection_10_27_13
lapadia added about 1 year ago

Hmmm, well Pierino, CF has only been a member of Food52 for a couple weeks so I totally read it as a cook who was adapting to the site. But anyway, I respect your thoughts and thanks for your time taken to answer back. Cheers!

Scan0004
susan g added about 1 year ago

And to confuse matters -- that is, confuse me -- there is another meaning to "Community Pick." Recipes from Amanda and Merrill, Genius recipes and other recipes from the editorial/article side are labelled 'community pick,' which seems to muddy the entire term. The short list for the contests are opened to 'community' (that's 'us') input, but the others are just titled by fiat. What's up?

Katerina6-
Culinary Flavors added about 1 year ago

Well, I couldn't agree more with all of you! Either it is a community contest or it is not. These intermediate things with recipes that are chosen without clear cut criteria and rules are so subjective. I am not suggesting that anyone has ulterior motives in choosing a particular recipe over another, but this procedure certainly leaves room to a lot of speculation! And most of all it is not just to all the contestants!

Zester_003

pierino is a trusted source on General Cooking and Tough Love.

added about 1 year ago

Back to editing. Unfortunately we are not an Athenian democracy where we all sit around all day reading every single recipe in the contests. Editorial is a necessary filter. I worked in the book publishing industry and it works the same way, tons of stuff is submitted but only a small percentage actually get published. In fact, the percentage of community picks at Food52 to total submissions is ten times greater than moves through publishing houses. I can't read every recipe. And in fact if I'm entered in a contest I won't read any. Because first, it's a jinx and second because I don't want to be influenced by what anyone else is doing. That said, you have to convey what makes your recipe different. To get noticed make the recipe more interesting than simply something of the same genre.

Dsc_0122.nef-1
Panfusine added about 1 year ago

Previously, they would put out a list of recipes selected as Editors pick candidates and there would be a mad rush to lay dibs on the recipes (they'd be all claimed within an hour of posting). Food52 would then test some more recipes from their end, and a week later, they wd add their picks along with 2 finalists, and the community tested picks wd also be listed. With the new system, it seems like a chunk of the recipes aren't even being claimed for community testing.

Dsc00859_2
creamtea added about 1 year ago

true, but now it's nice to have more than one tester. In the past a tester could claim a recipe but unexpected scheduling conflicts might interfere with that commitment.

Zester_003

pierino is a trusted source on General Cooking and Tough Love.

added about 1 year ago

All the more reason to make your recipe interesting to test, from the name through the headnotes. If you saw a recipe with the title "Doughnut" would you want to test it?

Dsc_0122.nef-1
Panfusine added about 1 year ago

thats true creamtea, but I think I preferred the part where Food52 picked their own set to test in addition, here they test some of the listed along with the community and one is always left with the question wondering if their decision over a recipe overrides the opinion of the tester.

Jampro
Bevi added about 1 year ago

There has been some controversy regarding the use of testers' reviews. This thread attempts to delve into the issue: http://food52.com/blog...

This issue is the actual use or non-use of a community member's favorable review to determine a CP (EP tested by a community member).

Scan0004
susan g added about 1 year ago

This may be relevant -- when Nora Ephron died, it was revealed that she was a secret contributor to food52. About a recipe of hers: was intensely annoyed that it wasn't named a finalist or even a community pick in the chili contest. It's tough love here at FOOD52.

Scan0004
susan g added about 1 year ago

(That is quoted from the 'features' article written about her.)

Jampro
Bevi added about 1 year ago

And I think one could extrapolate from this story that there are lots of great cooks whose recipes are overlooked.

Buddhacat
SKK added about 1 year ago

Susan I had forgotten about that, thanks for reminding us!

Buddhacat
SKK added about 1 year ago

Susan I had forgotten about that, thanks for reminding us!

Photo_squirrel
LE BEC FIN added about 1 year ago

My eyebrows are raised over the 'revealed that she was a secret contributor'. since most 52ers do not go by their real names, i would not use the rather romantic or alarmist term 'secret'. And/or maybe i'm sensitive to the hyperbole we all swim in when we encounter the media in our world (and it bothers me.)

Miglore

Kristen is the Senior Editor of Food52

added about 1 year ago

Hi all -- just wanted you to know we hear you. We think the current Community Pick system is one step closer to having more great, reliable, community-reviewed recipes highlighted on the site than the 1.0 version was, but we're taking all your feedback into account. The current system isn't likely to be our final community testing system -- we'll keep working to improve it.

Katerina6-
Culinary Flavors added about 1 year ago

I would like to thank you all for your valuable replies and thoughts on the matter. I appreciate your time and your considerations on the matter. To the dear fellow pierino I would like to say that of course you are not implementing Athenian democracy my dear, not even close, but since the editors are speaking about good old democracy, I think this should be served. I really don't understand the sarcasm and the hidden contempt to a civilization that has offered its light and discoveries to the modern world. I feel sorry if what I said bothered you in any way, but where I come from, I have learned to speak up my mind with respect and honesty. If those qualities annoy you, well, what can I say, since we live in a world where Athenian democracy is applied you have to respect my opinion just like I respect yours.

Dsc00859_2
creamtea added about 1 year ago

Yes, definitely stick around! It somehow works, and is a supportive group!

Zester_003

pierino is a trusted source on General Cooking and Tough Love.

added about 1 year ago

Actually to be technically correct we don't live in Athenian Democracy. We live in a Republic like Plato's idea. Think of the editors as your elected represenatives. As you are new to this site, what two weeks?, you might wish to spend some time learning the process. I have no contempt for Greek culture but it is a matter of fact that we don't in direct democracy with everybody in a town hall. What I've trying to do is give you advice on the why's and wherefore's of editing a publication---and this is a publication. It's simply unreasonable to expect that "the whole community" which numbers in thousands would come together every two weeks and suggest whose recipes go onto be tested.

Mrs._larkin_370

Mrs. Larkin is a trusted source on Baking.

added about 1 year ago

CF, I see you've met Pierino.

I hope you stick around. It's fun here!

Dsc_0122.nef-1
Panfusine added about 1 year ago

You took the words out my mouth Mrs Larkin..Yep CF's been acquainted with pierino!.. CF, thanks for initiating a wonderful discussion here & welcome to our Food52 world!

Jampro
Bevi added about 1 year ago

CF, Ditto from Mrs. Larkin. It is fun, and will be much more so for a greater number of cooks when the glitches regarding the EP process are resolved.

Jampro
Bevi added about 1 year ago

And Pierino, no one has suggested that thousands of food52 community members get together every 2 weeks to decide whose recipes are tested.

Zester_003

pierino is a trusted source on General Cooking and Tough Love.

added about 1 year ago

Well then Bevi, my confusion comes in here "I submitted a recipe in one contest, but if my recipe is not judged by the community from the very beginning to the end, I don't think I will ever participate again! " What else can that mean? The community comes in at three stages: writing recipes,testing recipes and voting on recipes. How much more participation is needed?

Massimo's_deck_reflection_10_27_13
lapadia added about 1 year ago

First off, welcome CF, here's to cooking and sharing! Second, hope you stay.

Massimo's_deck_reflection_10_27_13
lapadia added about 1 year ago

Dear Editors, A light bulb just turned on in my head, re: CP vs EP. The site has a feature called "views," aren't the view numbers generated by the community? If so then couldn't this feature (view) tie into what recipes the community is interested in? Couldn't that help to be a base for the CPlist of recipes to be tested & reviewed? I am sure programming could give some help with that? Just a thought. TGIF!

Zester_003

pierino is a trusted source on General Cooking and Tough Love.

added about 1 year ago

Lapadia, the problem with using "views" is that some of the recipes are a year or more old, so the view count will already be higher for them. About a month back I had an unexpected wildcard winner for a recipe I submitted three years ago and which one of the editors pulled out of the slush pile. All of the wildcards not necessarily pulled from the CP's. So using views would tip the scale toward older recipes.

Massimo's_deck_reflection_10_27_13
lapadia added about 1 year ago

Oh Pierino I thought of that, but...this is where the magic of computer programming comes in. IMO there could be endless opportunities for a programmer or two that have the time to devote. Would be a fun job for those who are in the "programming know."

Dsc00859_2
creamtea added about 1 year ago

(blushes) I look at mine a lot. I sometimes have to do a lot of edits ... I check for number Comments (don't get emails) and Views... so that effects the no. of views registered too

Zester_003

pierino is a trusted source on General Cooking and Tough Love.

added about 1 year ago

But even if you narrow the time frame to the contest window you still have a two week spread of "views". A recipe submitted just under deadline might have only one view.

Jampro
Bevi added about 1 year ago

creamtea, I have to laugh with you, not at you. I submitted a recipe today and had to edit it 6 times! I kept making a typo on the name of the main ingredient. Oh well....

ATG117 added about 1 year ago

I think some of us really appreciate that the editors, who are trusted experts, can give their seal of approval on certain recipes. While I love that recipes are pooled form the community and many great cooks and experts in their own right, its not possible to know where every recipe comes from. Cooking for most of us is an investment in time and money. Knowing someone you trust tested a recipe has great value in that respect. And as long as the community is involved, I have no problem with it being called a community pick, though I agree that editors pick may be a better title.

Zester_003

pierino is a trusted source on General Cooking and Tough Love.

added about 1 year ago

Well said, ATG117. I don't care what the nomenclature is. We all know what this is about. And none of us get paid to do it.

Dsc_0122.nef-1
Panfusine added about 1 year ago

My head still thinks of the recipes as EP's , even after 10 months of the term CP being used..

Buddhacat
SKK added about 1 year ago

One of the reasons I love Food52 -a question for clarity eliciting so many points of view and a lot of respectful dialogue. This site is definitely worth spending time on. Thank you, CF. Hope you stay around. I love Pierino's answers and his questions and have learned a lot from him in the past couple of years. And he does have a way of being a b...head at times and stirring the pot.

Dsc00859_2
creamtea added about 1 year ago

yes, "stirring the pot," very apropos :)

Dscn2212

Cynthia is a trusted source on Bread/Baking.

added about 1 year ago

Yes, he doesn't hesitate to stir pots, and there is abundant wisdom in his head.

Dscn2212

Cynthia is a trusted source on Bread/Baking.

added about 1 year ago

P.S. Thank your stars that you were lucky enough to encounter the great Pierino; not all are so fortunate.

Buddhacat
SKK added about 1 year ago

To be totally transparent I must say I am a Pierino groupie and proud of it.

Dsc00859_2
creamtea added about 1 year ago

P. does manage to ruffle a few feathers. Once you've been plucked and trussed by P., you've gained something.

Smokin_tokyo
BoulderGalinTokyo added about 1 year ago

Welcome CF. I noticed you posted another recipe so I hope you hang around. Food52 is definitely addicting!
But this is difficult. I am a prize and award winning recipe creator so I know my recipes are great. But I have yet to be selected for a CP or EP whatever. Thanks to Susan G reminding us that Nora was 'overlook' is why I've kept contributing. But at 35 recipes, my family has called a Stop Out.
At first I thought my recipes weren't chosen because I don't twitter, facebook, or have a homepage, which I started but since all the local ladies still wanted me to print the recipes out for them I didn't develop so much.
I have extreme respect for A and M, But since I've been probably been cooking longer than their mothers have, I have to decide if I want to keep donating recipes.
I had a bad period this summer when I saw a very original recipe of mine uploaded on someone else's homepage with no credit to me or food52. My photo too.
But I have learned so much from this site, and gained many new flavors and friends, that I can't quit.

Dsc_0122.nef-1
Panfusine added about 1 year ago

I hear you Bouldergalintokyo..I can't emphasize how valuable this site has been in terms of discovering new friends and learning from them, and some of the fabulous series like down & dirty that I don't seem to care too much about the contests that much any more..

Smokin_tokyo
BoulderGalinTokyo added about 1 year ago

And as for the P. He was raving and raving about Lucky Peach--I had no idea. So I ordered from Amazon 2 and 4 sight unseen, so hubby could bring back from a business trip. Say what? Culture shock! This is a cooking magazine?
≤((O⊽O))≥!!
Culture shock!

But reading through it I became a fan, this is fresh, new and stimulating! Hats off to Pierino. Educating us old dogs that still want to learn new tricks!

Photo_squirrel
LE BEC FIN added about 1 year ago

Most of the 52er friends who first introduced me to the recipe contests- have left 52 or stopped entering the contests. They all complained that the staff doing the bulk of the 'picking' were "20 somethings and/or cooking newbies w/o the necessary years of experience needed to make respectable judgements." They were also very disappointed in the seeming 52 staff aversion to the lesser known cuisines of the world.
I have been on both sides of the seesaw, but i am still contributing . I feel lucky for the inspiring ideas that i do see here (and hope that i have given some in return.)

Photo_squirrel
LE BEC FIN added about 1 year ago

p.s. more to the point, would it be so difficult for the name to be "Editor and Community Picks" until a revamping is actually in the works?

Img00019-20100929-0432_1_
sexyLAMBCHOPx added about 1 year ago

Curious about what "they" thought were the "lesser known cuisines of the world?"

Birthday_2012

Meg is a trusted home cook.

added about 1 year ago

Hi, haven't been entering contests or testing recently because of life events and hope to restart soon. Trying to think up a recipe is so interesting to me-- researching cookbooks and the internet, dreaming about something like radishes that I had never really thought about before... reading what other people come up with, testing a recipe, looking at comments. It's so unusual to me, as a pre computer person, to be able to contribute a recipe that other people look at and try without being a professional writer or cook. I DO like the "editor's pick" as more descriptive than community pick. And I have observed that there is some strategy around some people's entries, numbers of views, comments. It's hard to integrate all of that into selection. Finally, I luv reading Pierino's head notes, recipes, recipe titles and comments-- no lack of color there!! Hope you carry on, CF!

No need to email me as additional
answers are added to this question.