The Piglet2016 / First Round, 2016

The Violet Bakery Cookbook vs. A Girl and Her Greens

The Violet Bakery Cookbook

Claire Ptak

Get the Book

A Girl and Her Greens

April Bloomfield and J.J. Goode

Get the Book

Judged by: Julie Klam

After interning for Late Night with David Letterman, Julie Klam went on to write for such publications as O, The Oprah Magazine, Rolling Stone, Harper's Bazaar, and The New York Times, and for the VH1 television show Pop-Up Video, where she earned an Emmy nomination. The author of four (almost five) books, Julie lives in New York City.

The Judgment

When I got the two cookbooks, A Girl And Her Greens by April Bloomfield and The Violet Bakery Cookbook by Claire Ptak, I noticed that Bloomfield was a Brit working in America, and Ptak was an American working in London. What this means for those of you at home is that you can speak in an English accent when you are cooking from either of these books. The other thing is that—and no offense to my friends across the pond—but English food isn’t really known for being that great; I mean, no one ever says they’re going to England for the food. So if you make something from one of these two cookbooks and it comes out crummy you can be all: “It’s supposed to be, it’s ENGLISH FOOD!”   

I always prepare people for any dishes I make to be unsatisfactory, because I’m a little bit of a nervous chef. But what I lack in skills I make up for with excuses. I have the smallest kitchen in New York City, and because of limited space, I’ve had to rid myself of many of the tools cooks can’t do without (like a Cuisinart, and an oven mitt, and a counter). Also, I’m a little bit poor, so I don’t like to buy spices that I’m only going to use once, though I did buy cardamom for one of Ms. Ptak’s recipes. The cashier at D’Agostino's thought the item was mismarked because $14.95 for a tiny jar of a spice that seems like it’s spelled wrong is excessive. I agreed with her, but explained to that I had to purchase it anyway, in the name of science. 

Back to the books: Although my sainted and beloved daughter is named Violet, I am much more of a salad person than a cookie person, so I was certain the Bloomfield book was going to be my winner.

Oh wait, I’m not done with my excuses! Also: I’m not a “foodie.” I love to eat good food, but I cook a little like the people of yore (i.e. my mother). My first clue that I was unlike the cookbook writers is that no one seems to use the big cylinder of Morton salt. The ‘special salts’ are very big with these culinarians; kosher salt, “a flaky sea salt like Maldon,” fleur de sel. Do you know how many of those special salts I had before I started doing this? Zero. (No one seems to require Jane’s Krazy Mixed-Up Seasonings, which I do have.) I want you to know this because if I complain about not knowing what something is, you can refer back to this part and not think I’m just a run of the mill dummy. I am a self-aware dummy.   

I decided to start with The Violet Bakery Cookbook because I recognized more of the recipes in there, and I was just more comfortable trying chocolate chip cookies. I know the standard Toll House recipe by heart, and here are the differences: Ptak's have a little more butter, more brown sugar than white, egg yolks only, and more salt (kosher, of course). I baked them; I loved them. They were big and buttery and crunchy. Then I adventurously moved on to the butterscotch blondies (I know, not a great leap from the chocolate chip cookies, but too bad). These made everyone in my house make the Homer Simpson donut noise. My only problem with them was that I didn’t have—and couldn’t find, in any store around me—the pan size she recommends (12- by 8-inch). I’m sure they’re on every street corner in London. I bought the closest thing I could find (about an inch smaller), and it made them extra gooey, but no complaints about that. They’re also covered in caramel shards, and I need to take a slight detour here to explain something (you might have to refer back to the dummy part now): My pet-peeve in recipes is when one of the ingredients has a page number next to it, thus directing you to ANOTHER RECIPE WITHIN THE RECIPE. For example: 

125g (4 1/2 ounces) milk chocolate, broken into small pieces 
75g (2 1/2 ounces) caramel shards (page 238)

Ptak’s blondie recipe had a recipe within a recipe, which caused me to faint dead away. Mostly when I see that, I just skip the thing entirely. Is it because I’m lazy? (Um, yeah, duh!) But in the case of the caramel shards, it was just putting water and sugar in a pan and then putting it on parchment paper (or as I like to call it, “aluminum foil”). So I was okay with that. But if it’s just that one little thing, why not leave it on the page I already have the book open to? What am I, made of bookmarks? 

After the blondies, I moved on to her Chewy Ginger Snaps, which happen to be my favorite kind of cookie. These had two optional ingredients: coriander and paprika. I optioned out, only because when I opened the coriander I had, it looked like it was in some kind of X-files larval stage and the paprika I had was kind of brownish. (Note to self: Spices go bad.) I would’ve probably bought them except this was the recipe that I had already bought the million-dollar cardamom for. They were really good, but my own recipe from my friend Rebecca’s Grandma Polly is a little better, in my opinion—I’ve actually tried dozens of ginger molasses cookie recipes over the years, so I feel confident about this. I moved on to her Banana Buttermilk Bread recipe; the only ingredient I didn’t have was rum, but I bought a tiny airplane bottle of it which did not break the bank. I have been making the James Beard classic recipe since I was 10, but I liked this one even better. I made a few extra loaves and gifted them in “parchment paper.” 

I have to say that moving to A Girl and Her Greens was welcome because I was finding it difficult to snap my jeans. Right off the bat, I was smitten with Bloomfield's prose. She has a very funny, authentic voice. She talks about being a “cranky knickers” boss, and waxes rhapsodic about vegetables in season—the latter took me right back to growing up in Katonah with our huge gardens full of perfect tomatoes (or in my Brit accent, tomahtoes). In the introduction, she talks about how much she likes her vegetables just “boiled in salty water and served with a glug of olive oil and a sprinkle of chile or a tender squeeze of lemon.” But that wouldn’t make much of a cookbook, she says, which is pretty honest and I tend to agree.

She talks a lot about finding the best vegetables and letting that determine what you are making; she recommends walking through the farmers market and selecting only what’s great. This turned out to be my biggest problem. Although I downloaded the Union Square Greenmarket app on my phone, I don't actually know how to find fabulous vegetables by sight, and it’s even more challenging in November in Manhattan. I mean if I see heirloom tomatoes (tomahtoes) in July at a farm stand in Vermont, I feel like they’re going to be good, but I cannot do that with anything else. This is why I have avocados in my kitchen that are either rocks or rotten. 

So I went to the market and bought what I thought was good— asparagus—even though I know from experience that my parent’s asparagus is done by July. So maybe what I bought wasn’t asparagus… Anyway, I made the very delicious Tagliatelle with Asparagus and Parmesan Fonduta. Bloomfield says to “salt the water until it tastes slightly less salty than the sea.” As well as tasting good, it was impressive looking even though I didn’t make the pasta myself (recipe on page 127).

After that, I spent a week trying to figure out what else to make. At the last minute I went for her Salad Sandwich, which is essentially Pullman bread with lots of veggies and salad cream. It was lovely, though my mouth had some difficulty opening wide enough to get around it and I didn’t like the click my jaw made. Next recipe: Roasted Treviso with Breadcrumbs and Gorgonzola. Except I made it without Treviso, which is apparently a type of Italian radicchio that I couldn’t find anywhere.  I just used radicchio. It was pretty nice even though the pine nuts required a mortar and pestle, which I don’t have because I’m not a turn-of-the-century-chemist. 

The final recipe I wanted to try was Vegetable Crisps with Red Za’atar. (Other than overusing “Za” in Words with Friends, I had no idea what it was.) The special equipment required for this read like a who’s who of things I don’t own: deep fryer, check; mandoline, check; deep-fry thermometer, check; splatter screen, check; and a spider, which I do have in my bathroom, but I have the feeling that isn’t what she meant. So instead I read the recipe a lot, but didn’t make it—but I wish someone else would and send me some.

If I’d been testing A Girl and Her Greens in the summer and I had a great big kitchen full of equipment—and a different kind of spider—I would’ve championed it. As a book to read, I loved it: She is adorable and a riot and I even overlooked her having a dead pig around her shoulders on her first book cover. But making the food was just not working for me. I, along with my small kitchen and my one kind of salt, take responsibility for this, but I just kept going back to Ptak's book and cooking more and more. The recipes were familiar, but still interesting—which is why I will declare the winner The Violet Bakery Cookbook

And the winner is…

The Violet Bakery Cookbook

The Violet Bakery Cookbook

Get the Book

Do you Agree?

107 Comments

Andrea March 9, 2016
I like this review. What people here seem to be forgetting is that things don't always turn out your way: Sometimes with recipes, sometimes with the chosen author of a piece. Food52 gets to pick their writers. The one thing I enjoyed most about this review is the writer's honesty. Not everyone has a big kitchen, all the salts, or knows where to get what ingredients. She says she isn't a foodie. Cookbooks are not purchased only by expert cooks - they are purchased by a lot of people with different life experiences. Cookbooks are inspiring and these days they are beautiful, that only snobbish kitchen know-alps get to have a say in what they like it used is silly. I think Food52 has done a great job of letting a new, unashamed, not fancy cook make a decision. It's insightful. Ya'll should stop your whining. (Also I have and love both of these cookbooks. Not a fan of the heading fonts in April's but that's just me).
 
Andrea March 9, 2016
*know-alls
 
Andrea March 9, 2016
*like and used
 
Dave W. March 8, 2016
I'm sorry. I don't know how my comment came out three times and I wish some one would remove two of them.
 
Dave W. March 8, 2016
So here are two people who wrote cookbooks and put themselves on the line. (Read Yotam Ottolenghi about that)

And here are some readers who enjoy food and things related to food. They enjoy all or some of these things: eating food, preparing food, reading about food, reading about the people who prepare it professionally and learning about where the unusual food comes from.

And these readers buy cookbooks, many more than they need. So many of them are reading the Piglet to see what's next for their enjoyment.

And you turned all this over to an airhead who:
1) thinks this is all a hoot, and
2) thinks it's a good opportunity to write about her wonderful self.

Whisky Tango Foxtrot
 
Dave W. March 8, 2016
So here are two people who wrote cookbooks and put themselves on the line. (Read Yotam Ottolenghi about that)

And here are some readers who enjoy food and things related to food. They enjoy all or some of these things: eating food, preparing food, reading about food, reading about the people who prepare it professionally and learning about where the unusual food comes from.

And these readers buy cookbooks, many more than they need. So many of them are reading the Piglet to see what's next for their enjoyment.

And you turned all this over to an airhead who:
1) thinks this is all a hoot, and
2) thinks it's a good opportunity to write about her wonderful self.

Whisky Tango Foxtrot
 
Dave W. March 8, 2016
So here are two people who wrote cookbooks and put themselves on the line. (Read Yotam Ottolenghi about that)

And here are some readers who enjoy food and things related to food. They enjoy all or some of these things: eating food, preparing food, reading about food, reading about the people who prepare it professionally and learning about where the unusual food comes from.

And these readers buy cookbooks, many more than they need. So many of them are reading the Piglet to see what's next for their enjoyment.

And you turned all this over to an airhead who:
1) thinks this is all a hoot, and
2) thinks it's a good opportunity to write about her wonderful self.

Whisky Tango Foxtrot
 
carol M. March 6, 2016
I agree with all the comments about a bad match and the author not understanding her audience. My response? I just bought April's book.
 
Morningside H. March 3, 2016
Julie Klam is an engaging writer, but I think she does not understand her audience here at Food52. Why pick a writer who doesn't know how to cook, doesn't even seem terribly interested in food, and seems annoyed/perplexed by the idea of a mortar and pestle, or coarse sea salt!? Can we have a rematch for Bloomfield's excellent book because I fear a pearl has been cast before swine here. Again, no offense intended toward Julie but I don't think she was the right person to write this review. And by the way, her notion of English food is out of date. I'm not sure if she's been to London lately but the food scene there is very vital (Ottolenghi, the Gastropub food movement, lots of very exciting things happening over there from a food standpoint)
 
mtrelaun March 2, 2016
Her comment about English food made me peevish.
 
kasia S. March 2, 2016
Another disappointing review, Julie has an impressive bio but she makes it seem like she's on borderline poverty with not much but a bowl and a spoon her house. And no slat, I mean really?
 
kasia S. March 2, 2016
*SALT

you guys need an edit button
 
RahChaChow March 2, 2016
This review was great fun and it started my day with a smile. The Piglet is an entertaining way to get exposed to new cookbooks, and I'm sure the cookbooks featured get an uptick in sales whether or not they move on in the competition. There's no way to scientifically compare two disparate cookbooks and if you did, reading about it would likely be boring as hell. I'm a fan of Piglet. Keep the entertaining reviews coming!
 
Sauertea March 1, 2016
Jarrad, I agree with your comment about the timing for revieiwing books which are heavily dependant on seasonal produce. Saving the Season, by Kevin West was hampered by the same problem, as many of the recipes were dependant on summer fruit. I love both of April Bloomfield's books.
 
JK March 1, 2016
Strongly disagree with the verdict, but Julie brings up a very relevant point.

Season of review might bias against certain seasonal books.
 
Sauertea February 29, 2016
I have thought a lot about this review before deciding to comment. Last year, I was somewhat disappointed by the final selection of Brooks Headley's Desserts over David Lebovitz's My Paris Kitchen. My reaction to the review otf these two books is similar. The review, as others have stated, seemed to focus more on the prelude to cooking and the search for the ingredients than on the actual recipes themselves. Additionally there seemed to be a number of throw away lines about not having the right ingredients or tools and as a result the reviewer chose to do something different. Baking, in particular, is more like a science and less forgiving. It seems to me that the reviewer should have prepared to test these books by having those implements to allow for thoughtful testing and evaluation. By contrast, the review by Brookes Headley did just that. His review of Seven Spoons and My Kitchen Year allowed for a well considered selection of My Kitchen Year. While nature of the Piglet probably ventures into the realm of the subjective and personal preference, it seems to me that a serious approach to the recipe testing is needed. That being said, these two first round reviews have made me want to revist Fancy Desserts and see if maybe I have underestimated Brookes Headley.
 
Threemoons February 29, 2016
More on this later, but just a quick note before I go off my lunch break: Do NOT whine about high spice prices at Manhattan chain supermarkets when there are two major resources nearby: One is called Queens, as in the entire boro. I can get a 6-oz bag of incredibly fresh (high turnover) ground cardamom--both the green and black varieties--for around a buck fifty at the Trade Fair near me in Astoria. The second is called the Internet. On the latter point, let me point you towards Penzys, already mentioned, and an even better pick in the form of World Spice Merchants. WSM is AMAZING, has many rare blends available both whole and ground to order, and best of all, you can get almost anything in amounts as small as 1 or 2 ounces. Anyone who goes into Kalyustan's for anything is going to get ripped off.
 
SNNYC February 29, 2016
Even Kalustyan's (and the store next door which imo has fresher spices) and Dual Spice would be cheaper than $15 though. And all in Manhattan. I believe Sahadi's in Brooklyn has decent prices, too. Completely agree on Queens, but hey, I'm used to people from Manhattan not stepping foot in my borough under any circumstance.
 
SNNYC February 29, 2016
Oh, and yes, I love WSM as well as The Spice House!
 
Madeline March 15, 2016
I live in Brooklyn, the outer edge of Bushwick, to be more precise. I would never blame someone to not venturing to another borough for spices. It may be a few dollars cheaper but you spent 5 dollars getting there and back AND lost and hour (minimum) of your life to the MTA. Either way those spices cost a pretty penny.
 
SNNYC March 15, 2016
But the point is she didn't have to venture out to another borough. As I mentioned both Kalustyan's (which is overpriced compared to other places), and the store next to it, and Dual have cardamom for less than what the reviewer paid. Not to mention there are other spice shops all throughout Manhattan.
 
beejay45 February 29, 2016
As many other commenters, I enjoyed the review, but once again it's apples and oranges. How can any reviewer, no matter how skilled a cook they might be, give a really unbiased comparison of two such disparate books.

I, too, was offended by the comment about British food. This was a common perception/joke in the post WWII years because of how the cuisine had been reduced to its lowest common denominator by food rationing during the war and in the post-war recovery years. This hasn't been true for a very long time, and I wish people would get over it.
 
Krysia February 29, 2016
A note to Julie about her aged spices: Replace them overtime, but not by buying them at those overpriced markets in New York. Bad and old spices will ruin your cooking and baking.

Order them at Penzeys. I am lucky enough to have a store within 5 miles of my house, and since they opened a few years ago, I have replaced all my spices with theirs. They are astonishingly potent and fresh, vastly cheaper as well as better than grocery store spices, and can be purchased in a number of sizes, including a small jar holding 1/4 cup. If you'd bought your ground cardamom at Penzeys, you'd have paid $8.55 for it. If you buy $30 worth of spices from them online, the shipping is free.

If you can manage to take a field trip to one of their stores, you will be able to smell each and every spice and herb they have. And they have everything you can think of, and plenty you've never heard of, except for ras el hanout. And your beloved, old-timey Jane's Mixed Up Seasonings, of course.
 
LRSZ February 29, 2016
I am sorry, Food52, but this review is entirely disappointing! The writing itself is entertaining, engaging, and well-crafted. The issue is that most readers of Food52, myself included, are enthusiastic and practiced home cooks. We know what cardamom is and it isn't a surprise to us that spices go bad. It isn't particularly helpful for me to read a review of a pair of cookbooks written by someone who not only doesn't know very much about cooking, but doesn't seem to enjoy it. What is the point of using reviewers who have such a low level of knowledge about food and cooking? It seems as though the reviewer sold A Girl and her Greens short, not because it is a bad cookbook, but because she wasn't a good enough cook to understand or enjoy it. Between this and the similar mis-handling of Mamushka, I'm really falling out of love with the Piglet this year. Food52: Please listen to these reviews and think wisely (and with your readers in mind) about whom you choose to write your reviews next year.
 
Selkie February 29, 2016
Any chance we could invite Bloomfield's book back for a first-ever Piglet Rematch Smackdown? While I, too, found this review entertaining in its way, it also made me cringe, and my contact embarrassment for the author is at about an 11. I would love to read a more in-depth, balanced opinion in this case, rather than trope after tired trope.
 
breakbread February 29, 2016
The Piglet is fun but each year seems to digress into a muddle of an attempt to match not only cookbooks but like-minded reviewers with books. What was the rationale for judging these two great, yet unlikely books together? And the reviewer can write but not cook? Unfair to both Food52 readers and the authors of the cookbooks. Silly review.
 
Erin A. February 28, 2016
Oh, this is sad. A Girl and Her Greens is a groundbreaking way to approach vegetables and savory cooking. The Stewed Squash (if you can get past the name) was a recipe that changed my life last summer, and has me dreaming of this coming year's glut of squash. There are so many wonderful cookie and cake books...this one didn't sound that different, but rather a novelty to a reviewer that hasn't read a lot of the others.
 
Mary February 28, 2016
The flaw is comparing two entirely different genres... Not a level playing field.
 
Lisa February 28, 2016
Yes. And assigning reviewers who don't know how to tell the difference between yet another chocolate chip cookie recipe and innovative, mind-blowing food.
 
SGSF February 28, 2016
I enjoyed the review as a piece of writing. The author was lively and funny. As a professional pastry person I appreciated seeing the cookbooks from a novice cook's eye. That said, it made it challenging for me to "use" the review for more than entertainment. I own the Ptak book and appreciate it's aesthetic very much. Are they the greatest recipes? No, but they are a good source of inspiration. I love Bloomfield and food and point of view. I think it does a disservice to both talented women to analyze their books together. Savory and sweet cooks are each a different breed, and to compare them is apples and oranges at best. Love your concept, and the writing, but stick to savory v. savory etc to make the column but engaging and useful.
 
Lisa February 28, 2016
I wanted to scream throughout this review. Yes the author is funny. Yes I understand that the purpose of the Piglet is to entertain. But this is a community of serious cooks, many of whom have too many cookbooks and honestly want to know how to judiciously pick the next must have. To assign these two terrific books to someone with old spices and no apparent idea how to buy new ones is just frustrating. Still love you Piglet. :)
 
Cindy A. February 27, 2016
This made me laugh out loud!
 
starving_artist February 27, 2016
Sorry Bloomfield all the way. Love the fennel salad.
 
Musinsgondinner February 27, 2016
I recently bought Ptak's book myself so eagerly read this review. I did like the writing, on the whole - its breeziness - but was surprised by the reductive and old-fashioned view on English food. I live in London (but am not British/English) and the range of restaurants is excellent, and home cooking - like home-cooking anywhere - varies from insipid and overcooked to inspired. I'm glad I didn't let the line put me off reading further but it did grate a little!
 
granjan February 27, 2016
I loved this review. I'll look for Julie's name, cuz I'd like to read more from her. But, I too, find the pairing of the 2 books a little odd. Lots of cooks never bake, and vegetables and pastries are not really comparable subjects. (I always root for the pastries!)
 
bookdwarf February 27, 2016
Great entry! I need to get Bloomfield's book for the summer.
 
MJAdams February 27, 2016
I skimmed thru Aprils book & ended up buying Vioket bakery. As a chef & baker for almost 30 years I found it unique and I lived the beginning of her stories at chez Panisse and each into to the chapters. I like that she uses heartier flours and the recipes work. I like that she has baked for awhile and wrote her book later in her career. It's my new favorite!
 
alygator February 27, 2016
I loved this review! Above all Piglet should be fun and this review certainly was. Clearly, her claiming to not like to cook was a joke as she had an impressive collection of recipes in her own recipe box. Not every bracket should be judged by successful chef. It's great to have a regular person without access to certain chef-y ingredients and tools attempt these recipes. I could so relate to her comments! There have been different Piglet reviews that have ranged from stupendous (read Nigella's!) to very disappointing (anyone who doesn't actually cook from the books they are reviewing). I thought this was honest and fun!
 
Wendy February 27, 2016
This article was a great piece of art in itself. Condensending, critical of self, funny, absolutely tongue in cheek honest. Like many of the general public who are partly addicted to getting more cookbooks, she doesn't have all the equipment, we make do (invent a splatter guard, fold paper from the printer if necessary). Regardless of the critiques above re-stating she doesn't like cooking. We know she loves cooking because she reminds us of favourite recipies she has cooked time and time again over the years. She has an opinion. She was asked for one and provided it, very entertainingly. I didn't agree with every point that was made about the Brits, I might already know a little more about British food than she does. It doesn't matter who writes the review or the nationality of the author of the cookbook, the cookbook content is in question. Whether we like the style of the cookbook, the layout and finally the food. Comparing a "baking, sweet style" cookbook against a "seasonal vegetable" cookbook was bound to illustrate critisisms at the get go. I love to bake but I start thinking of my meals at the Greengrocers as I am being more aware of health this year. The author does say how she loved the way April writes, and I'm all for being entertained whilst preparing my veg. ....and so Thank you for the fabulous review and all relevant comments above. Glad I joined Food52.
 
jakestavis February 27, 2016
i thought this was a very fair review and i appreciated the appeal to different perspectives.
my question though is how was the bracket drawn up? it seems like these two and hot bread kitchen are the only books that are focused on particular ingredients (baked goods, vegetables) rather than restaurant cookbooks or cuisines from particular cultures, but i'm wondering why these two were paired rather than hot bread and the violet bakery?
 
702551 February 26, 2016
The more I think about this, the more I'm convinced that Julie Klam would write a similarly entertaining piece about any review: auto repair, Wagnerian opera sopranos, orchid cultivation, whatever.

She transfers the focus from the book authors to her own writing and I'm not convinced that this is a good thing in this case. Michiko Kakutani's book NY Times reviews were often accused of doing the same thing: being more interesting than the book itself.

I've dealt with this situation with some of my friends. I might ask them about, say, a movie, and one might retort, "Save yourself ___ dollars and just read ____'s review, it's far more entertaining than the actual movie."

In this case, I think Klam's review devalues Ptak and Bloomfield's efforts by shifting the focus to her own words.

But that's just me...
 
blacksbread /. February 26, 2016
Testing bread recipes over the past year I would often ask those friends and colleagues who had never used yeast or had never fermented dough to follow my lead and make one of my breads. I didn't always get the result that I had hoped for, but often what I got was revelatory. The virgin eyes of non-bakers helped me understand components of a recipe and process I did not always see for myself. Long story short: I thought this review was refreshing and I would buy both books.
 
luvcookbooks February 26, 2016
Own both books. Like Em both. Review was fun!!!
 
mrslarkin February 26, 2016
BAKED GOODS FOR THE WIN! Thank you, Julie, for such a fun review. (Pop-Up Video was MY LIFE.) FYI, here are 199 other cardamom recipes you might want to try, what with your abundance of spice: https://food52.com/recipes/search?q=cardamom&cat=community-picks

I own The Violet Bakery Cookbook. It's lovely and inspiring. The molasses cookies are pretty great. I'll probably check out A Girl and Her Greens from the library. Psyched to try some veg recipes.

FYI, the only point of The Piglet contest is to have fun, and to spotlight some of the year's best cookbooks (they are ALL winners.) To everyone who didn't like this sarcastically funny review I say calm your cranky knickers down and chillax a little.
 
LLStone February 26, 2016
Hear, hear!
 
Can I. February 26, 2016
Thank you, Mrs. Larkin! Lighten up, people, for eff sake.
 
debra K. February 26, 2016
Agree! Love this review!
 
3jamigos February 28, 2016
Hmmm, "best cookbooks" therein lies the problem...if you tell me these cookbooks are entertaining and pretty ok, but "best" implies the recipes work and are reproducible. I have the Violet Bakery book while pretty there are quite a few inconsistencies in the measurements and directions. Look at the scone recipes (5 cups of flour = 12 scones wow) and cinnamon buns, grams and volumes are off. Perhaps if the review was given to one with more baking experience this might have been caught but I'm sure weighing ingredients did not even cross the reviewer's mind. I am not alone in mentioning the problems with this book, check out the reviews.
 
Gail H. February 26, 2016
I love cookbooks and always look forward to reading The Piglet each year, but today's article was such a disappointment. Why give the pen to someone who doesn't like to cook?
 
Jenali February 26, 2016
I always look forward to the reviews during the Piglet. I'm glad that Julie tried multiple recipes from each book (although it seems like she might have made more from the violet bakery cookbook). Her review makes me want to check out The Violet Bakery Cookbook.
 
Barbara M. February 26, 2016
I loved the article - great writing and funny. But I hate the review. The Piglet has lost all credibility in my book.
 
Louisa February 26, 2016
"it was just putting water and sugar in a pan and then putting it on parchment paper (or as I like to call it, “aluminum foil”)
Hilarious review. Thanks Julie Klam!
 
Burf February 26, 2016
This was Julie's opinion, and it was a well written review. My beef? I was hoping to hear more details on the recipes. Why was Grandma Polly's recipe better than Ptak's? Why was Bloomfield's Roasted Treviso (or radicchio) "pretty nice?"

At least she wasn't asked to review Faviken... Parchment paper is a heck of a lot easier to find than a burnt-out trunk of a spruce tree.
 
eatboutique February 26, 2016
love. love. love.
 
James F. February 26, 2016
Yeah, I agree. This was a weird one. Why get someone like this to review a cookbook? Jokes are funny. I was curious to see someone honestly measure the merits of the books. I haven't cooked from the Violet cookbook. Cooked a bunch of recipes from the Bloomfield book - the recipes are really well-tested and turned out great in my shoebox-sized kitchen. Sorry to see it dismissed like this.
 
Rachel February 26, 2016
"What am I? Made of bookmarks?!" Hilarious. This, too, is a huge pet peeve of mine. Loved this review!
 
Can I. February 26, 2016
This is going to be my new favorite retort.
 
Cindy A. February 27, 2016
Agree!
 
Talia February 26, 2016
With cookbook "judges" of Ms Klam's calibre the resulting judgment is as valuable as a coin toss.

Kudos to Brooks Headley for his thoughtful, meaningful judgement.
 
debra K. February 26, 2016
Love to cook and have a large, well-stocked kitchen. Still wasn't taken by the Bloomfield book. Really, really enjoyed this review and am going to check out the Ptak book ASAP.
 
Tippy C. February 26, 2016
This gal can write and I applaud her sense of humor, but she has moved the judging bar down to a new five-inches-from-the-floor limbo level. I generally appreciate the wide variety of Piglet judges, but most of them actually enjoy cooking to at least some degree (isn't this a cooking site?). This reviewer's assumptions—i.e. kosher salt, cardamom, and parchment paper are specialized ingredients, English food is universally disdained—are hard to swallow. I would certainly have given her a pass if she were living in a more isolated or rural part of America, but she is writing from New York City for crying out loud and that kind of provincialism just seems annoying.
 
Anabel February 26, 2016
This review is an extremely disappointing follow to Brooks Headley's excellent reviews in round 1. What is the point of making someone who doesn't seem to have much of an interest in cooking review COOKbooks? So the author can try to be cute (and not even that funny) about not having the right ingredients and/or equipment?

On a positive note, the rye brownies in the Violent Bakery Cookbook are very good and worth trying.
 
MRinSF February 26, 2016
I understand that the Piglet tries to present lots of perspectives and I appreciate the spirit of that approach, but this review really frustrated me, mostly because Julie seemed determined from the get-go to find both books too exotic, too fussy, and too much about actual cooking. I am glad that she actually made recipes out of both, but I can't help feeling her snide attitude did both books a disservice and diminished her credibility (even as an inexperienced cook -- not to mention the opening ignorant comment about British food -- YAWN). When all is said and done, I know way more about Julie than I do about either of these books, and that's frustrating.
 
SpringUp February 26, 2016
The reviewer doesn't even enjoy cooking so why would she be picked to be a judge? Just because you're a tv personality and an expert in some field doesn't mean it's a good choice for this contest. Review was too smirky for my taste.
 
IAmJ February 26, 2016
Enh. I own and love quite a few of this year's Piglet finalists, but do not have either of these two books (hello, slight but manageable cookbook addiction!). I was hoping to get a better feel for them after this review. Unfortunately, this was pretty much pointless, other than as a way for the author to try to score some laughs with lame jokes like "English food sucks" (London's food scene is HOT these days, btw), "check out how hilariously clueless I am about cooking" and "I'm so poor I don't even own an oven mitt/parchment paper/real salt". Too bad. I'm sure many of the other entries will be given a more fair and thorough review with more effort from a reviewer who is more competent in the kitchen (which doesn't mean the review can't still be fun and funny to read).
 
LJ S. February 26, 2016
I am, from now on, not going to get my KNICKERS IN A KNOT over the inability of the judges who've been chosen to decide the Piglet winner to cook and instead try to enjoy the articles.

I guess this was SUPPOSED TO BE funny. Sadly, a sense of humour is a matter of taste and this article was less than DELICIOUS to me. Maybe ask Aziz Ansari to be a judge next time… he's supposed to be funny and has an idea about food and cooking.

Also, I agree with the commenters who think that the 'joke' about British food (isn’t really known for being that great) is incorrect. Great and horrible food can be eaten in ANY COUNTRY.
 
GigiB February 26, 2016
I am looking forward to reading all these reviews. From a writing perspective they're just such a joy to read. It seems a bit strange that the piglet is generally misunderstood. I hesitate to say that because it's not as if I inherently get it my self. I can see how comparing a bakery cookbook to a greens cookbook makes sense in an odd way. It's a disparate pairing that a home cook would understand because we would use either book in a home setting and yeah, even compare them at home.
 
Pastraminator February 26, 2016
I agree, it seems that it's more about sharing writers perspectives and seeing through their eyes than it is a competition with parameters on what is attainable for home cooks. That said, I'm enjoying the perspectives, I'm not hung up on who is winning. Also a spider is pretty much just slotted spoon.
 
petitbleu February 26, 2016
Pro tip: for spices, go to Kalustyans--you would have saved yourself $10 or so and could have gotten a considerably larger quantity. When you live in what is one of the best cities for international grocery shopping in the world, there's no need to pay that much for cardamom.
 
willowp February 26, 2016
I enjoyed the writing very much, but I don't get how Girl and her Greens was was given to a non-foodie. Unfair!
 
navahfrost February 26, 2016
Can't resist a shout out to Bloomfield; I always find myself returning to her book. The "Salad Sandwich" that is referenced in the review is made using a really great recipe for Salad Cream, a cross between a dressing and a dip which I adore and have made many times, now a real go-to for all sorts of things. The book is worth buying just for that! There's also a bullet proof Zucchini recipe that can be made year round, even with it not being in season- too bad the reviewer didn't try it because it also doesn't call for any special tools.
 
rosalind5 February 26, 2016
Oy. A tired joke about English food. How many times have I heard this, an ex-pat living in the US for >25 years, from people who have never actually been to the UK? Not from anyone who have actually been to Britain in the last 20 years.
 
Pastraminator February 26, 2016
I live in NYC, so i understand lack of space. I buy all my cookbooks via ibooks now, It makes traveling to fire island during summer a lot easier and on space in apartment, it also has a handy embedded link to those troubling toggling issues. Also note taking is easier also on recipes (my hand writing is horrible)
I also have to respectfully disagree with choice. I find "A Girl and her Greens" easier to go back to and attainable, where as " The Violet Bakery" is a bigger commitment with ingredients and time. Baking usually is though however baking is Magic.
 
Victoria C. February 26, 2016
Glad to read your comment about iBooks. I too have started to get my cookbooks so I can load them onto my iPad. I can access the books without walking to a bookcase, they come with me when I travel, and if there's a recipe in a recipe, no problem - just a click away. It makes reading cookbooks in bed a no-brainer. Whatever you want is there. Although it seems like an intuitive move, you are the only other person I've heard that does this.
 
Maddie L. February 26, 2016
Good thing YOU don't work at a cookbook store :)
 
Pastraminator February 26, 2016
The only cookbook store i'm aware of in NYC is an out of print cookbook store, so i don't see the issue :). Shout out to Bonnie Slotnick! :).
 
witloof February 28, 2016
OH MY GOSH Pastraminator, have you NEVER BEEN TO KITCHEN ARTS AND LETTERS????

http://kitchenartsandletters.com/bookstore/
 
Victoria C. February 28, 2016
I agree; it's amazing. What a treat the first visit will be. The cookbook store aluded to in response to my comment is Read It & Eat in Chicago, another fine place. http://www.readitandeatstore.com
 
Pastraminator February 28, 2016
Victoria, I forgot about that one, I lost the upper east side in the split with my partner. It is a lovely spot. Also, they closed the place across the street that i used to get beautiful kippered salmon. The fat on the underside of skin of the salmon was sublime. So living in Brooklyn, the possibility of running into my ex and the bitterness of losing my kippered salmon connection has made Kitchen Arts forays limited. However, if i remember correctly they had the most amazing collection of cookbooks published from other countries that you could not find anywhere else.
 
Emily L. February 26, 2016
legitamately laughed out loud multiple times, which was not expected from a cookbook review. bravo! loved this.
 
Liz M. February 26, 2016
I really get tired of British food being rubbished by Americans. As a Brit now living here I do not understand where the sense of foody superiority comes from. I suspect it goes back to GIs experiencing war time rationing in the UK. Well guess what? The food scene in the UK is vibrant, innovative and full of amazing cooks like April Bloomfield and Meera Sodha. This review tried too hard to be funny at the expense of the cookbooks she was supposed to be reviewing. It ended up being more about her than the books she was supposed to be reviewing. I suggest you get someone else to review these books and preferably not pit them against each other as they are 2 completely different culinary disciplines.
 
Victoria C. February 26, 2016
I like your comment very much. What about Yotem Ottolenghi, Nigella Lawson, Nigel Slater, Simon Hopkinson, Delia Smith (why is she not popular here?; one of her recipes is an all-time fav in my top ten), Fergus Henderson, ELIZABETH DAVID, and on and on and on. You said it; it tried to be funny; it was not. I would go to England to eat in a red-hot minute.
 
queencake February 26, 2016
i felt the same about the British food comment- just think it is completely unnecessary to start off a review with a snarky comment like that.
 
petitbleu February 26, 2016
Totally agree. There are so many amazing representatives of British food culture that it's silly to make fun of it. And it's not like the majority of Americans eat gourmet food either (we are, after all, the culture that spawned the 24-hour Taco Bell).
 
zerosummer February 26, 2016
One thing I really like about the Piglet is that it's for everyone--those of us who have two kinds of spiders in our house and those who only have one (the scary kind). For me, recipe accessibility is an important part of evaluating a cookbook; even if I might be familiar with more unusual tools and ingredients, I don't always want to break them out for a weeknight meal. I'm glad the Food52ers have brought together so many people from different cooking backgrounds to share their various perspectives over the course of the contest, and I particularly loved this review! It's gotten me excited about both books.
 
Kenzi W. February 26, 2016
You nailed it; that is exactly what we try to do. This makes me happy!
 
Tracey T. February 26, 2016
Hear, hear! Not everyone is a fancy pants cook, but everybody eats. As the cookbook buyer for a large bookstore, I spend every working day judging cookbooks. The opinions of a beginner cook are just as important as trained chef when it comes to cookbook shopping. She was gloriously spot-on about the recipe withing a recipe thing. And while she may have been a bit clueless on the state of modern British cooking, England does have to take responsibility for the prevalence of mushy peas. PS, I own both of these cookbooks, and I would have chosen The Violet Bakery as well.
 
EmilyS1220 February 26, 2016
Shucks. I absolutely love A Girls and her Green and was convinced it was going to make it through a few rounds. I find the recipes to be really inspiring and feel a little defeated it was beat by cookies.
 
Katy B. February 26, 2016
Loved the review! Julie Klam is hilarious. Does that mean I agree with it? NOT AT ALL. Girl and Her Greens stole my heart, and I already have (too) many baking books. Can Julie be a regular contributor?
 
Susan February 26, 2016
Julie Klam is insanely hysterical!!!! Every word that comes out of her mouth is a gem!!!
 
booglix February 26, 2016
This was a lovely, funny review. I happen to have most of those needed items in my smallish kitchen (minus the deep fryer), and prefer delicious, interesting vegetable recipes over delicious, interesting cookie recipes. So I think I'd prefer April's book. But cookbook audiences include all kinds of people, not just experienced and well-equipped cooks, so fair enough!

One thing: cardamom should not cost anywhere near $15. Go to an Indian store or a place that sells spices in bulk!
 
ChefJune February 26, 2016
It's too bad no one told Julie about Kalustyan's on 27th and Lex where she could have gotten just the amount of cardamom she needed for the recipe. I was totally enchanted with her stories about cooking from the two books, and it's making me really want A"A Girl and Her Greens."
 
Linda E. February 26, 2016
It's a funny review, but .... I have about 20 baking books, and I bake something maybe once a month. I eat vegetables 2 or 3 times a day. I need to think much more about vegetable recipes, and learn from other people who are better/different in this field. But it's about 1 reviewer and her personal take on 2 books. Me, I will buy the Greenfield book, because the reviewer doesn't give the impression the Violet book would tell me anything new.
 
sianbum February 26, 2016
I'm not sure a vegetable based cookbook can do well if tested in the Northeast in November, but I very much appreciated that once again the recipes were actually tested. "What am I, made of bookmarks?" is going to be my new catchphrase.
 
Vittoria A. February 26, 2016
Mine too, I loved that line. But obviously Julie does not share my habit of using anything within reach as a bookmark. Kleenex, leaves, socks, stuffed animals....
 
Zoe R. February 26, 2016
Sad to see a vegetable driven book knocked out by baked goods!
 
Victoria C. February 26, 2016
I don't know if I agree since I only have A Girl and Her Greens and have been debating whether or not to get The Violet Bakery Cookbook. It doesn't sound like she cooks a lot (I could be wrong), but she actually cooked from both books - bravo to her for that - and it sounds like she really likes one, which now moves ahead. By the way, there's a great Food52 article written by Alice Medrich about what to do if you are using a different size pan from the pan specified in the recipe; I keep it in my cooking loose-leaf book, and I used it to turn my brownie recipe into a cake, which was not as intuitive as it seems. Also, Amazon has 8 x 12 x 2-inch-pans and 8 x 12 x 3-inch pans available so I wouldn't let that deter me from getting The Violet Bakery Cookbook.
 
Greenstuff February 26, 2016
Here's the article you mentioned https://food52.com/blog/13239-how-to-make-your-baking-recipe-fit-your-pan-size
 
amelia February 26, 2016
I agree. She doesn't sound qualified to write a food article. Shouldn't a cook have fresh spices and have a clue about za'atar?
 
THEToughCookie February 26, 2016
Julie is a writer who likes to eat and does prepare food for her family. Other than being a writer, Julie Klam is every person who tries to find their way around the kitchen. I think it's refreshing not to have a professional or even an experienced cook writing a review.
 
702551 February 26, 2016
I have mixed feeling about this review despite the fact that I don't own any of these books.

Each book is written in mind for an audience, some of them very narrow, some wide. I am not convinced that Julie Klam fits that target audience for either book plus I have a strong feeling that she is trying to upstage the focus -- the books -- with her own writing.

It's almost like having a concert violinist judge a surfing competition.

Having multiple viewpoints including people without the proficiency with the matter at hand works better in a panel of judges (where the high and low scores can be thrown out to reduce bias).

Here, both Ptak and Greenfield get short shrift compared to other authors who may have their books reviewed by someone more familiar with food.

In the end, it's really what the Food52 editorial staff wishes to accomplish with The Piglet. Do they want a fair cookbook review competition that results in a meaningful winner or do they just want pageviews and entertain the readership?
 
Valhalla February 26, 2016
Amusing, but I take this a bit more seriously than I should I guess.
 
Victoria C. February 26, 2016
I didn't find it even amusing, but I didn't want to rant about that in my comment, which I was starting to do, so I stopped. Judging from the first two comments, people don't agree with me.
 
queencake February 26, 2016
I didn`t find it amusing either- and I agree with some other comments, that she should at least have an idea what she`s doing. as it is, the review seems rather unfair.
 
Peony February 27, 2016
I didn't find the review either entertaining or informative but I'm just chalking it up to the reality that you can't please everyone.
 
Marcia S. February 26, 2016
I don't know about the recipes, but this is the funniest review I have ever read!
 
THEToughCookie February 26, 2016
I nominate Julie Klam to write all cookbook reviews for the rest of time. The tears are rolling down my checks from laughing (alone)!!!!!!