Is Growing Lettuce Like Marijuana the Future of Farming?

April 13, 2016

For years, the only produce that thrived indoors—and made money doing so—was cannabis. The leafy, THC-producing plant grew happily in fraternity basements and the back rooms of Colorado shops under harsh, inexpensive halogen bulbs. Under the same lamps, more heat-sensitive leafy greens, like lettuces and sprouts, withered.

Edenworks's indoor farm in Brooklyn, New York

But they flourished under energy-efficient, cooler LED lights. The only problem was that the high cost of these lamps prohibited farmers from using them on a large enough scale. Instead, they turned to sun-soaked greenhouses like the season-extending structures common on California farms, holding "fields" of lettuce and tomato plants. But without the ability to stack the plants into vertical farms—which would block out sun for the lower levels—this solution limits the amount of produce farmers are able to grow.

Within the past five years, due to innovations in technology, the cost of LEDs dropped by 85%—making the lights accessible and profitable to indoor farms for the first time. Jason Green, CEO and co-founder of Edenworks, a vertical indoor aquaponic farm in Brooklyn, New York, crunched the numbers: In a 9,000-square foot facility with roughly 20-foot high ceilings, they could produce 120,000 pounds of produce annually, or the equivalent of roughly 10 to 15 acres.

Shop the Story

Edenworks is one of several indoor farms who have jumped on the favorable price of LEDs, but unlike most vertical indoor farms, which use carefully curated formulas to provide nutrients to their plants, their fertilizer of choice comes from an adjoining tank of Tilapia.

LED lights over several of Edenworks's crops, including micro-basil in the foreground

Hyrdoponics vs. Aquaponics

There are three primary types of soil-free indoor vertical farms: hydroponic, aeroponic, and aquaponic. While hydroponic (the most common of the three) and aeroponic both use man-made recipes of fertilizer solutions (often from from both organic and synthetic chemicals), plants in an aquaponic system derive their nutrients from fish waste. Aeroponics differs from hydroponics in that the roots dangle free, out of water, and are rehydrated by mist.

Jason likened hydroponic farmers' manmade mixtures to Soylent:. "Sure, all the basic components are there," he said, "but is it as rich as real, whole foods? We would argue no." According to Jason, the greens produced by most hydroponic facilities lack the depth and flavor that aquaponic farms are able to produce from natural fertilizer.

Is one really better than the other?

Viraj Puri, co-founder and CEO of Gotham Greens, a hydroponics facility founded in Brooklyn, argued that using a formula actually yields the healthiest, best product possible. His own company uses a precise mixture of about 80% organic fertilizer to 20% synthetically-derived nutrients, which are necessary for water solubility. "By using fish waste, you don't have that same level of control over the nutrition," he said, "so you can't drill down to the parts-per-million of nitrogen in the water. You see a much greater variability in the crop quality and taste."

"The big benefit of hydroponics," expert and indoor farming consultant David Goldstein told me, "is that I can take one water sample that goes to 1,000 plants and know exactly what those 1,000 plants are receiving and adjust accordingly." But at the same time, he admitted, blanket statements about farming methods versus other farming methods are never completely accurate: "There are certain crops that work better in hydroponics, and others that work better in soil—even between plant stages, plants' preferences changes."

When it comes down to it, Yemi Amu, who describes her facility, Oko Farms, as using a hybrid of hydroponics and aquaponics, said, "Farming is farming. It isn't soil versus hydroponics versus aquaponics—we need to expand our approach to growing food and embrace sustainable practices however they're achieved."

Left: Baby basil; Right: Yello chard

At Edenworks, the fish, kept in a large tank at the end of the greenhouse, are fed a pelletized mixture of non-GMO plants and fish meal. Their excrement then flows through a waste filtration system where it's broken down. The raw excrement is funneled into a "200-gallon container of bubbling poop" where it's constantly blasted with oxygen to maintain a healthy pile of compost, while the healthy bacteria and nutrients are sent toward the plants.

The plants are suspended in floating, styrofoam containers over the fertilizer- and nutrient-rich water.

The plants themselves are suspended in floating, styrofoam containers under LED lights, in individual pods that contain milled coconut husks (coir) and a small amount of vermiculate, pearlite, and seaweed meal for added potassium and phosphate. But even these additives may someday become unnecessary—Jason and his team plan to someday create a fish food pellet that would eliminate the need for them.

The tank of Tilapia (left) and filtration system (right)

If this sounds easy, it's anything but. The micro-ecosystem here, and those created in other indoor farms, are still fragile. During the hour I was in the Edenworks greenhouse, a computer that monitors the entire system displayed a graph that continuously dipped, then climbed. Debi Zvi, Edenworks' head of nutrition, explained that the carbon dioxide I produced was enough to throw the system into flux, which sent a signal to the automatically connected fans to kick in and add oxygen back into the system. Without precise data monitors, the entire system could fail.

At the same time, many risks that haunt traditional farms are much less important in indoor farms. There are fewer issues from bugs (because indoor farming has shorter crop cycles, bugs like aphids don't have time to settle in and lay eggs) and far fewer food safety concerns (in aquaponic farming, the fertilizer is coming from a cold-blooded animal rather than from a mammal, like cows, so there's no risk of ecoli). There's also a minimized risk of contamination from handling, since it's possible to automize the seeding, harvesting, washing, and drying—fewer hands touch it.

Once the crops are harvested, they're also able to make it to the consumer faster. While lettuces travel cross-country from California to New York in the winter, which can take as many as six days, indoor farms like Edenworks can get their products onto shelves within 24 hours of harvest. For those who prioritize eating locally—a market that's growing twice as fast as organic foods—this can be considered an enormous advantage.

Would you be more or less likely to buy produce from indoor farms? Does it make a difference to you? Tell us in the comments below!

See what other Food52 readers are saying.

  • Sebastian Myers
    Sebastian Myers
  • Mary Pat Horn
    Mary Pat Horn
  • Smaug
I eat everything.


Sebastian M. May 3, 2016
farming is one of the best way to invest money or efforts. there are lots of firms or companies that offers to farmers such as earning money by investing in farming & agriculture. one of them is
Mary P. April 13, 2016
I read you float the plants in styrofoam, any chance of the plant absorbing shedded plastic from the styrofoam in this process??
Smaug April 14, 2016
Smaug April 13, 2016
The parallel with marijuana is a bit forced- MJ is generally grown indoors under artificial light to keep it from being stolen or confiscated; I don't think anyone grows it in stacks as the plants tend to be a bit taller than lettuce. Given the mediocre quality of greenhouse produce in general, one can but hope for the best from produce grown under such completely artificial conditions.