Popular on Food52
11 Comments
Mark M.
July 24, 2017
Maybe in certain circumstances destination weddings are selfish (like the hypothetical tiny island with 3 plane trips and a boat ride to get to), but I don’t think they are necessarily so. These days when a couple is having a wedding, it’s highly likely at least 50% (but probably more) of the guests are going to have to travel to the wedding. Gone are the days that most people stayed close to their place of birth all their lives and married someone from their hometown. It’s not uncommon at all for, say, the groom to have grown up the Northeast, the bride to have grown up on the West Coast, and they met when they both ended up living in Texas for work. If they do the “traditional” thing and have the wedding at the bride’s hometown on the West Coast, then the man’s family is all going to have to travel all the way across the continent, and the couple’s good friends in Texas are going to have to travel halfway across the continent to be there. A flight to a destination wedding in, say, Jamaica, isn’t necessarily going to cost the groom’s parents any more than a flight to the West Coast would have. Ditto the hotel.
Heck, my wife and I did NOT have a destination wedding, we had a wedding in the beach town in Texas where my parents have had a vacation home since the early 80s, which is an hour to an hour and a half by car from the city I grew up in and where my wife and I lived and still live (and where my parents live). But plenty of people had to travel for our wedding. My wife’s mother and stepfather had to take an hour plane ride, rent a car, and take that hour and a half drive down. My good college friends who still live in our college city had to make that same trip. Since my parents moved to Texas after college, all my aunts and uncles and cousins had to travel from the West Coast, the Northeast, the Midwest. My wife’s father and stepmother had to come from Florida. My younger brother had to come from New York. I’ve had to travel all over the country for weddings, that’s just the nature of life in 21st Century America.
Heck, my wife and I did NOT have a destination wedding, we had a wedding in the beach town in Texas where my parents have had a vacation home since the early 80s, which is an hour to an hour and a half by car from the city I grew up in and where my wife and I lived and still live (and where my parents live). But plenty of people had to travel for our wedding. My wife’s mother and stepfather had to take an hour plane ride, rent a car, and take that hour and a half drive down. My good college friends who still live in our college city had to make that same trip. Since my parents moved to Texas after college, all my aunts and uncles and cousins had to travel from the West Coast, the Northeast, the Midwest. My wife’s father and stepmother had to come from Florida. My younger brother had to come from New York. I’ve had to travel all over the country for weddings, that’s just the nature of life in 21st Century America.
702551
August 22, 2017
The local newspaper has an interesting article about this topic based on data from Zillow (the real estate website & service).
http://www.sfgate.com/realestate/article/millennials-bachelor-parties-homes-zillow-11748731.php
The article specifically calls out Texas as a relatively inexpensive place for these types of activities.
http://www.sfgate.com/realestate/article/millennials-bachelor-parties-homes-zillow-11748731.php
The article specifically calls out Texas as a relatively inexpensive place for these types of activities.
702551
June 15, 2016
Actually, reflecting back on this, I would say that many people who are renting are doing so because they attend destination weddings rather than RSVP-ing "Sorry, trying to save up for a down payment on a house, let's catch up when you return. So happy for your special day."
For some, it's a choice between memories and equity.
I certainly will not be one to advise people here what the best choice is.
For some, it's a choice between memories and equity.
I certainly will not be one to advise people here what the best choice is.
Betsey
June 15, 2016
While I really enjoyed the wedding I attended in Cancun in January, $1500 for four days was a HUGE ask and it was very hard on my bank account. But how could I have missed it? It sucks.
AntoniaJames
June 14, 2016
Here's a crazy suggestion for having a wedding exactly the way you want it and where you want it, while minimizing stress: have a small wedding wherever, whenever, and with only close family and close friends. Then let each of the newlyweds' families throw their own parties for the couple, on their own, whenever, inviting whoever they want, wherever they want. The hosting family can invite as many friends and relatives as they want, choosing the menu, flowers and decorations, absolutely everything. It's the parents' party, so let them see to all the details - the newlyweds arrive as guests. As many members of the other newlywed's family who want to come can be invited. Special events can be planned (think rehearsal dinner equivalent) to get more members of the two families together. Everyone is happy. Trust me. All those relatives and friends who can't or don't want to fly to another city for the wedding will be thrilled to come to the "in honor of" party. (It's what T and I did, and I truly hope that my sons will consider doing it that way, too.) ;o)
AntoniaJames
June 15, 2016
For the record, our "destination" was Murray Hill (5 days after my corporate tax law exam - trust me, if you can manage corporate tax, pulling off a wedding 5 days later is a snap) and the rehearsal dinner was at one of those (do they still have them?) word of mouth only restaurants in Chinatown, downstairs with no sign on the door, always packed, outstanding food, seated around enormous tables with lazy Susans laden with about 12 dishes each. The dinner was arranged and "menu" items were chosen by the NYC-raised Chinese-American girlfriend, now wife, of a close friend. Such fun. Really "off road," and quite an experience, but an interesting and unforgettable one, especially for the family members from out of town. ;o)
Courtney C.
September 20, 2016
This is exactly what we are thinking of doing. We spoke to all of our family and close friends first to see if they would be open to it. I'm glad to hear yours was successful! It gives me hope! Thanks for the advice.
booglix
June 14, 2016
I think the most compelling criticism of destination weddings is that some people who would like to attend the wedding - for whom attending the wedding would be meaningful and fun - are not able to because of the cost (and, perhaps, timing). So even if you don't pressure them to come and they gracefully decline, they'll feel left out and sad to be unable to take part in this important event. If everyone you know is wealthy and has ample vacation time, that's a moot point of course - but I doubt many people are in that situation. Sure, some people have to travel to non-destination weddings, but "destination weddings" usually cost a lot more, for a lot more people. Plus, if you're close enough to the couple, it's very difficult to decline (because you want to support them and it would really suck not to be there and you can manage to pay for it), so you go, and probably have a great time, although you'd much rather have been able to attend a lovely celebration less far away and spend your hundreds or thousands of dollars on something else.
702551
June 14, 2016
I went to a fine destination wedding of a family member in a place very far away. What this essentially did was wipe out all the children attendees (plus weed out the people who couldn't afford international flights). It was basically an adult-only event.
I like the basic notion of Antonia James' idea, although it forces the couple + key people to travel to three events instead of just one.
Booglix is right. The financial strain on many younger wedding attendees is significant. If you are spending a couple grand on "destination wedding" travel, well, that's a couple grand that's not available as a down payment on a house.
One of my family members had a fabulous destination wedding, but ended up in a very acrimonious divorce a few years later. No one talks about that wedding. I think there's a CD of scanned photos and a DVD somewhere in a closet. I also have a few trinkets from that particular trip.
Yeah, yeah, feel free to call me a killjoy, but the divorce statistics for this country aren't something I make up.
If the Food52 editorial staff want to feed the Beast that is the Wedding Industry Machine, go right ahead.
(Disclaimer: I have never been married. I have no problems with the institution or concept of marriage, but I'm definitely not going to blog about it.)
But anyhow, go ahead and throw your destination wedding if you want.
I like the basic notion of Antonia James' idea, although it forces the couple + key people to travel to three events instead of just one.
Booglix is right. The financial strain on many younger wedding attendees is significant. If you are spending a couple grand on "destination wedding" travel, well, that's a couple grand that's not available as a down payment on a house.
One of my family members had a fabulous destination wedding, but ended up in a very acrimonious divorce a few years later. No one talks about that wedding. I think there's a CD of scanned photos and a DVD somewhere in a closet. I also have a few trinkets from that particular trip.
Yeah, yeah, feel free to call me a killjoy, but the divorce statistics for this country aren't something I make up.
If the Food52 editorial staff want to feed the Beast that is the Wedding Industry Machine, go right ahead.
(Disclaimer: I have never been married. I have no problems with the institution or concept of marriage, but I'm definitely not going to blog about it.)
But anyhow, go ahead and throw your destination wedding if you want.
See what other Food52 readers are saying.