Fry
Oeufs en Cocotte
Popular on Food52
9 Reviews
cookinalong
December 14, 2010
OK. Don't want to be a pest, but if the recipe really calls for 12 eggs and you should break one into each of 6 ramekins, that's now six eggs unaccounted for. Is this recipe meant to serve 12? Thus there should be 12 ramekins? Only being persistent because this sounds do good and I'm going to have overnight guests New Year's Eve. This sounds the perfect morning after comfort food breakfast before the resolutions kick in!
Kayb
December 14, 2010
Lord. I don't know where my mind was when I was posting this! I have done these with both one egg and two. For the ramekin above, which holds about 2 cups, I used two. You can also use more, or less, bacon, to your taste, or you can substitute ham. If you are using smaller ramekins, use just one. You can really modify these any way you choose, adding mushrooms or a different meat or whatever else strikes your fancy, but don't be tempted to cook them longer than 15 minutes, if you want a runny yolk! It won't look like it's cooked to the "over-easy" stage in 15 minutes, but it is....
cookinalong
December 13, 2010
Have I misunderstood something? The recipe calls for 2 lg. eggs, but directs you to break an egg into each of 6 ramekins.
Kayb
December 13, 2010
Gulp. Should've been 12 large eggs. I lost a 1 there somewhere. Either that, or I was thinking about the proportions for one!
See what other Food52ers are saying.