Kitchen Design
The Best Lighting Ideas For Maximum Kitchen Visibility
Plus, ideas for keeping the mood warm and inviting.
Popular on Food52
16 Comments
Jimmy111
January 19, 2022
Hello, my name is Jimmy.. I'm a Seo Friendly writer and Seo Expert. If you need any help for your site Please feel free to contact me ... [email protected]
anniemardel23
July 6, 2021
Hello, thanks for sharing this blog . this is very usefull for me. if you want any help regarding Laptop Repair Near in Miami Lakes
then contact with - https://techycompany.com/miami-lakes-fl
then contact with - https://techycompany.com/miami-lakes-fl
anniemardel23
May 28, 2021
Hello,thanks for sharing this blog , this is very usefull for me , if you want any help regarding iPhone repair in cooper city then contact at DrPhoneFix Cooper City. more- https://techycompany.com/cooper-city-fl
anniemardel23
May 27, 2021
Hello, thanks for sharing this blog , this is very helpful for me , if you want any help regarding computer repair in plantation then contact with Techy - By DrPhoneFix Plantation. more- https://techycompany.com/plantation-fl
john A.
March 18, 2021
Would you discuss under cabinet lighting. I think a lot of kitchens need these type of lights.
mnc50515
March 14, 2021
Color temperature does not correspond to how well one can see. Color fidelity and brightness are far more important. A 2700k light source with a CRI of 90+ is better than a 5000k source with a CRI of 70+ At the same brightness.
The best way to improve one’s kitchen lighting would be to add task lighting, such as under cabinet lights. The DoE has a report on high performance residential lighting by room: https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy12osti/53467.pdf#page46
The best way to improve one’s kitchen lighting would be to add task lighting, such as under cabinet lights. The DoE has a report on high performance residential lighting by room: https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy12osti/53467.pdf#page46
Peter
May 21, 2016
I think you mean Edison style, not Einstein style. Feel free to delete my comment after you edit the article. :-)
Vicki
March 14, 2021
Peter, I had worked as an editor, and I, too, send in comments occasionally two websites. Seeing those typos and errors is a curse, but I’m glad to know that I am not the only one who is fighting the good fight!
Vicki
March 14, 2021
Ugh!! I was dictating my comment, and I didn’t proofread! Of course, it should have been “TO“ not “TWO!”
Smaug
May 19, 2016
When I was doing some electrical work in NorCal a few years back (ok, not that few) kitchens were required to have at least one fluorescent light, though the requirement was often met by simply putting a CFL in an ordinary fixture. Sunken lighting was all the thing then; I hope THAT has passed. Halogen lights are actually incandescent; the addition of halogen gases in the bulbs cause the evaporated tungsten to condense on the filament rather than the inside of the bulb (the black you get in old standard incandescents), so that the bulb can operate at a much higher temperature. That's why the bulbs are made of quartz; glass can't take the heat. They are, I believe, a bit more efficient as far as light to temperature ratio, but no big bargain, and of course they have safety concerns. This use of "Kelvin" as a measure of light is unfamiliar to me- the only Kelvin scale I know of is the temperature scale (based on absolute zero) used in most sciences.
Personally, I've grown quite fond of CFLs- I find the modern ones quite efficient and pleasant to use, and they can often be had at very good prices- so far I've kept LEDs to a few flashlights due to the price, but it is improving.
Personally, I've grown quite fond of CFLs- I find the modern ones quite efficient and pleasant to use, and they can often be had at very good prices- so far I've kept LEDs to a few flashlights due to the price, but it is improving.
702551
May 19, 2016
The use of Kelvin to describe color temperature has been around for decades and well known to photographers. It has to do with matching a blackbody radiator with that of the light source that is being measured.
In fact, it was commonplace to use tungsten-balanced film for environments that had that sort of light or daylight-balanced film for those environments. If you used the wrong film in the wrong setting, you'd get weird results, but there were various color correction filters/films to get the image to what the photographer envisioned.
The lighting industry uses CRI (color rendering index), but fluorescent lights don't have the same spectrum output as incandescents. Fluorescent lights pump out huge amounts of light in the green wavelength which is why old color film photographs taken in fluorescent lit scenes had a noticeable sickly greenish cast. Fluorescent bulbs also pump out a bunch of UV.
From a color output perspective, CFLs are still terrible compared to the alternatives.
In fact, it was commonplace to use tungsten-balanced film for environments that had that sort of light or daylight-balanced film for those environments. If you used the wrong film in the wrong setting, you'd get weird results, but there were various color correction filters/films to get the image to what the photographer envisioned.
The lighting industry uses CRI (color rendering index), but fluorescent lights don't have the same spectrum output as incandescents. Fluorescent lights pump out huge amounts of light in the green wavelength which is why old color film photographs taken in fluorescent lit scenes had a noticeable sickly greenish cast. Fluorescent bulbs also pump out a bunch of UV.
From a color output perspective, CFLs are still terrible compared to the alternatives.
702551
May 19, 2016
I hated CFLs for the few years when I had them for a variety of reasons and when LED bulbs became affordable I banished CFLs from my home.
In my mind, CFLs are a total sham. The earliest ones only came in cool white so every room looked like a coroner's walk-in refrigerator. Years later, bulbs with better color temperatures arrived, but that didn't fix any of the other shortcomings with CFLs.
The longevity numbers for CFLs are a joke. They are based on how long the bulb would last if it is never turned off. Turns out that in real world usage (lots of switching on and off), the electronic ballasts are usually the parts that fail, not the lighting elements.
Next problem, CFLs buzz. I could hear them. Fine for a noisy shop/industrial environment when they are twenty or thirty feet up, not so pleasant in a standard home with eight foot ceilings.
Worse, the light output of CFLs steadily drops over time. Over the course of a CFL bulb's predicted lifetime, at the end it will emit about half of the light that it put out brand new. Yup, that 100W equivalent CFL might be feebly putting out about 60W equivalent in three years.
CFLs are also poor performers, taking several minutes to reach peak light output and perform poorly in colder environments. They can be used in outdoor fixtures in warmer climates (like California, Hawaii, etc.), but aren't good for many other places.
When LEDs arrived, I removed all the CFL bulbs, stuck most of them in a bag by the recycling bin with a sign that said "Working bulbs. Free!" and they were gone in an hour. I kept 2-3 CFLs which I've been using in my outdoor patio light.
Based on my personal experience, CFLs are complete garbage as home lighting technology.
In my mind, CFLs are a total sham. The earliest ones only came in cool white so every room looked like a coroner's walk-in refrigerator. Years later, bulbs with better color temperatures arrived, but that didn't fix any of the other shortcomings with CFLs.
The longevity numbers for CFLs are a joke. They are based on how long the bulb would last if it is never turned off. Turns out that in real world usage (lots of switching on and off), the electronic ballasts are usually the parts that fail, not the lighting elements.
Next problem, CFLs buzz. I could hear them. Fine for a noisy shop/industrial environment when they are twenty or thirty feet up, not so pleasant in a standard home with eight foot ceilings.
Worse, the light output of CFLs steadily drops over time. Over the course of a CFL bulb's predicted lifetime, at the end it will emit about half of the light that it put out brand new. Yup, that 100W equivalent CFL might be feebly putting out about 60W equivalent in three years.
CFLs are also poor performers, taking several minutes to reach peak light output and perform poorly in colder environments. They can be used in outdoor fixtures in warmer climates (like California, Hawaii, etc.), but aren't good for many other places.
When LEDs arrived, I removed all the CFL bulbs, stuck most of them in a bag by the recycling bin with a sign that said "Working bulbs. Free!" and they were gone in an hour. I kept 2-3 CFLs which I've been using in my outdoor patio light.
Based on my personal experience, CFLs are complete garbage as home lighting technology.
702551
May 19, 2016
Oh yes, another shortcoming with CFLs: most are not dimmable.
Even many of the ones labeled as dimmable have poor dimming performance. Trust me, I tried several of these dimmable bulbs and they all ultimately ended up in non-dimming light fixtures after weeks/months of frustrating poor dimming performance.
Maybe some of the new CFLs are better, but the technology was brought to the consumer marketplace before manufacturers were capable of putting out a decent product and with the widespread emergence of good LED lighting options, CFL's ship has sailed.
For sure, LED isn't perfect (pricing is still high and there's still the fact that the way light manufacturers measure longevity isn't the way people use light bulbs), but LED is miles better than CFL.
Even many of the ones labeled as dimmable have poor dimming performance. Trust me, I tried several of these dimmable bulbs and they all ultimately ended up in non-dimming light fixtures after weeks/months of frustrating poor dimming performance.
Maybe some of the new CFLs are better, but the technology was brought to the consumer marketplace before manufacturers were capable of putting out a decent product and with the widespread emergence of good LED lighting options, CFL's ship has sailed.
For sure, LED isn't perfect (pricing is still high and there's still the fact that the way light manufacturers measure longevity isn't the way people use light bulbs), but LED is miles better than CFL.
AntoniaJames
May 19, 2016
The material / color of the globe and shade also make a big difference. I have onyx pendants over my sink, one on each side. The effect is soft to someone standing halfway across my tiny kitchen, but the halogen light coming down is perfect for dishwashing and prep on the postage stamp sized counter adjacent to it.
Just a reminder too that anyone upgrading lighting in their kitchen should check with your city or town's office that handles permits for residential electrical work. In CA there are strict laws on energy efficiency that will probably affect your choices - though with more high efficiency options these days, meeting the requirements should be easier now than it used to be. (And yes, get a permit and signed inspection. When you sell your house, you may be required to disclose any non-permitted work done.) ;o)
Just a reminder too that anyone upgrading lighting in their kitchen should check with your city or town's office that handles permits for residential electrical work. In CA there are strict laws on energy efficiency that will probably affect your choices - though with more high efficiency options these days, meeting the requirements should be easier now than it used to be. (And yes, get a permit and signed inspection. When you sell your house, you may be required to disclose any non-permitted work done.) ;o)
Vicki
March 14, 2021
I would absolutely love to see pictures of your onyx pendants… Is there anyway that you could post it? Thanks so much!
See what other Food52 readers are saying.