Popular on Food52
7 Comments
Cynthia P.
November 12, 2018
I'm so happy to know about a restauratur who is thinking about this. As one who lives with someone who struggles with alcohol I know that creating alcohol-free environments is important for family members as well. Every employee should be able to participate in thier company's events without having to face their biggest demons. Yay for putting the focus on the people.
HalfPint
August 8, 2016
I see no problem with this policy. It's been implemented in a number of places other than the food and hospitality industry. If the law holds employers and hosts responsible for the actions of their drunk guests, then those hosts and employers have every right to not have alcohol at their sponsored functions.
702551
August 3, 2016
Great idea, perhaps more chefs should be considering this.
That said, I'm not certain that Food52 is the best place to stand on a soapbox and shout it out to the world. This is a highly consumer-focused site. Moreover, it's mostly about home cooking, not restaurant cuisine.
Maybe this type of post should be published elsewhere, on a site that focuses on the restaurant business. The best example I can think of is the Inside Scoop section of SFGate (San Francisco Chronicle).
Despite the URL, www.sfgate.com/food isn't about food in general, it's about restaurant reviews. The Chronicle has largely abandoned any original content about home cooking years ago and the guy in charge -- Michael Bauer -- is a restaurant reviewer who has zero cooking skills.
That said, I'm not certain that Food52 is the best place to stand on a soapbox and shout it out to the world. This is a highly consumer-focused site. Moreover, it's mostly about home cooking, not restaurant cuisine.
Maybe this type of post should be published elsewhere, on a site that focuses on the restaurant business. The best example I can think of is the Inside Scoop section of SFGate (San Francisco Chronicle).
Despite the URL, www.sfgate.com/food isn't about food in general, it's about restaurant reviews. The Chronicle has largely abandoned any original content about home cooking years ago and the guy in charge -- Michael Bauer -- is a restaurant reviewer who has zero cooking skills.
Alexandra V.
August 3, 2016
Understandable, but I feel that forcing others into abstinence, will drive them to rebel and that taking away free will is a little stifling (we are a creative bunch in this industry and I grew up in uber Mormon Ut, where I see that abstinence causes over-consumption) . To each chef their own, and hopefully a change for the better in the industry, that we can be taken seriously as professionals with unique skills and be valued as such. I just feel like if you trust me to work at your business, then you should trust me to make adult choices and have good boundaries(I would be lying if I said I never met out of control cooks, there are some for sure, but not the majority). Interesting read, none the less, I really enjoy reading about what folks in the industry are doing whether or not I hold the same opinion.
Sara
August 3, 2016
I work in another industry altogether and love this idea. My company hosts a weekend trip for staff and spouses, which is very generous. In the 15+ years I've been with the company, I have seen so many inappropriate behaviors and interactions related to the free alcohol provided. When you are embarrassed for your coworkers after a company event, something has gone wrong.
Alexandra V.
August 3, 2016
I grew up in a conservative place, so I see it as a bit uptight. I am also a life long industry person, and whether or not the company event has booze, if a person has a drinking problem they will go drink afterward. Sometimes drinking is "social lube" and can relax folks enough to get to know each other, but if you are passing around a handle of "old crow" you may have a problem on your hand. I think its a bit rigid, and my colleagues work regardless of hang overs, so if we have company parties twice a year, and folks want to have a few cocktails good on them. I think it is the nature of the industry that needs to change, company parties with booze isn't the problem, a work force with no work/life balance, many employees without access to health insurance and cash for healthy food, and constant stress without a release contribute to a unhealthy person, not allowing drinking at the company party seems like putting a band-aid on a bullet hole.
Julia B.
August 3, 2016
I hear you, Alex, thanks for sharing. In Button's mind, removing alcohol from work functions is one of the ways in which she cares for her staff, members of which *didn't* show up to work when hungover, unlike your colleagues. Offering paid time off, providing health insurance, and generally maintaining a high level of professionalism are other ways in which she aims to create a good work environment and a better work/life balance for those operating in that environment. (And of course, if someone has a drinking problem, she or he will find a way, but Button wants to control what goes on under her roof.)
See what other Food52 readers are saying.