Lists

5 Recipe-Writing Quirks That Bug a Professional (& Maybe You, Too?)

February 21, 2017

Great recipes come in all shapes and sizes. They can be brief and to-the-point, like the emergency exit instructions printed on the windows of a bus (“Lift latch to open. Push out at bottom.”) or they can be as vague and flexible as a horoscope, leaving space for the reader to take what she will and apply it to her own life (and her own kitchen). Or, they can be meandering and intricately detailed.

Each approach to recipe writing has real potential to be successful and I believe there’s room in our lives for them all. In fact, our lives are immeasurably richer when we are surrounded by a diversity of voices and styles. The more, the merrier.

Within those many approaches, are there any commonly-accepted phrases we could do without? I am certainly guilty of falling into the trap of familiar wording, even when I know the writing is problematic or confusing.

Here are a few recipe writing norms I’ve been reconsidering lately:


1. The passive voice
Every English teacher admonishes students to avoid writing in passive voice and instead use active voice, wherein the subject of a sentence is doing the action. I notice passive voice in recipes all the time, however, and even though I try to eradicate it from my own writing, it creeps up on me. (“Bake until the potatoes can be pierced easily with a fork” instead of “Bake the potatoes until you can easily pierce them with a fork,” for example—or “Cook the risotto until all of the broth has been absorbed” as opposed to “Cook the risotto until you’ve added all the broth.”)

Shop the Story

2. “Combine”
Judith Jones famously despises the use of this verb in a recipe. Instead of “combine the ingredients in a bowl,” she’d prefer more precise language, such as “whisk together the flour, sugar, and salt” or “stir the wet ingredients into the dry.” I have written many sentences beginning with the word “combine,” and I’m going to make an effort to stop, because if Judith Jones teaches it, I listen.

To write a good recipe, and I feel this very strongly, you have to express exactly what you do. You have to be able to explain well.
Legendary Editor Judith Jones

3. “Set aside”
If I had one pet peeve about recipe writing, the direction “set aside” would be it. It's never necessary; you can simply go on with the recipe. (And if the next step isn’t clear, then there’s some other issue with the instructions.) For those moments when a component must actually be physically set aside, better to choose a descriptive verb: chill in the refrigerator; freeze until solid; cover and place in a warm spot to rise.

4. “Season to taste”
I don’t mind using this phrase, although I realize it’s a controversial one. Telling a cook to season a dish to taste is absolutely bouncing the ball into his or her court. It can be helpful in some instances to give a guideline or a starting point, perhaps by writing, “Stir in 1 teaspoon of salt, and then taste and adjust the seasoning, adding more salt if needed.” It’s also crucial to clarify what you should taste for, because “season” doesn’t always mean with salt. A recipe should specify whether more lemon juice or vinegar might be necessary, or if another pinch of a ground spice used earlier in the recipe could be added.

5. “Preheat the oven”
Recently, I fell down a rabbit hole of existential thought about this common phrase, and I’m not sure I’ve emerged. Do we preheat an oven or simply heat an oven? When a recipe instructs a cook to bring a pot of oil to 350° F for frying, the line is usually: “Heat the oil to 350° F.” Why should an oven be any different?

How about you? Are there certain phrases that bug you when you’re writing a recipe or following one? I’d love to know.

See what other Food52 readers are saying.

  • DylanTonic
    DylanTonic
  • Brooke
    Brooke
  • SweetiePetitti
    SweetiePetitti
  • Bascula
    Bascula
  • Marsha Mc
    Marsha Mc
Maria Zizka is a cookbook writer and recipe developer who has collaborated with leading chefs, including Elisabeth Prueitt, Jessica Koslow, and Suzanne Goin. She has co-authored numerous award-winning cookbooks, most recently Tartine All Day, Everything I Want to Eat, and This Is Camino. Her first solo cookbook, THE NEWLYWED TABLE, will be published on April 2, 2019.

104 Comments

DylanTonic September 3, 2018
RE Preheat; I'm OK with this. I think it's a nice subtle way to remind less experienced (or forgetful) cooks that ovens take time to come to temperature.
 
Brooke March 14, 2018
When ingredients aren't listed in the order in which you use them.
 
SweetiePetitti March 11, 2018
When the recipe ingredient list says 1/2 cup water but buried in the recipe it says add 1/4 cup and reserve the remaining water to be used later. Dang it. I’ve probably already dumped it all in.....
 
Bascula March 10, 2018
“Marinate overnight”, when you not going to cook it in the morning- it should say ‘marinate for x hours’ instead. Too many recipes tell me to chill or marinate or let sit ‘overnight ‘.
 
Marsha M. March 10, 2018
A HUGE one for me: pourover. "when you are done whisking the eggs, pourover the flour and stir in" (ingredients completely random and off the top of my head). First, pourover isn't a word. next, are we to pour the eggs over the flour, or the flour over the eggs? In many cases, it matters.
 
Anne-Marie April 13, 2017
Preheat hearkens back to the days when stoves were either wood or the scary kind of gas (you risked life and limb to light). As for passive voice - there is a useless you added when it's implied already. Change the verb tense to create a more dynamic flow (Boil potatoes until easily pierced with a fork; boil potatoes until a fork pierces easily) - the you is implied, and the active verb is actually boil). The season to taste makes me crazy, personally; my husband LOVES salty, while I prefer the delicate tang of salt to enhance my meal, so "to taste" happens after the meal is plated (because seriously, his plates are gritty afterwards and that's just gross - ha, ha).
 
Alison T. February 26, 2017
Just out of curiousity, why wouldn't you consider pepper to be a seasoning? I might describe seasoning as an element that while has an impact on the finished flavour of a dish, actually performs no function in a dish, as might salt, sugar or an acid. I'm NOT trying to get up your nose but to clarify. If, for example, we're talking baking, well, then salt and sugar (and maybe an acid) actually perform a function. In savoury cooking, one might argue that both acid and sugar perform a function. And we all know that it's impossible to add salt to pasta after it has been boiled. Pepper? Frankly, I think you're on thin ice there but I'm more than willing to hear your side. Convince me!
 
Jeremy B. February 26, 2017
I too, unfortunately am a pedant. I have enough chutzpah to not have to measure and weigh with implements, but "season" tickles my pickle. Pepper is NOT a seasoning. Salt and sugar and an acid of your preference (vinegar or citrus) ARE. Learn your basics .
 
Alison T. February 26, 2017
Ok, I'm going to go crazy when I can't edit my own comments...
1. Mass OR volumetric not both
2. Don't start the oven
 
Alison T. February 26, 2017
Generally, I think we're all in agreement:
1. Mass or weight or volumetric works better (’an apple' - which apple?)
2. Read the recipe and if you're going to be chilling for 12+hrs, don't start the just yet
3. Passive voice? Meh, we're divided.
4. Listing ingredients should be in the order they are used in the description. AND, if using the same ingredient several times, should be noted as 'separated'. This way ALL the butter doesn't end up in the fry pan AND if something is missing in the instructions you stand a chance of seeing it and putting it in in the right place. Even the very best writers make the odd mistake...
 
arielcooks February 26, 2017
This should go without saying, but the ingredients should be listed in the order in which you use them in the directions. It's crazy-making to follow instructions when they cite the ingredients out of order!

Also, volumetric measurements are fine, but for some recipes equivalent weights are most helpful.

Good possibilities for the word 'combine' are 'distribute' and 'homogenize', especially when you want everything that you "combine" to produce a consistent combination throughout.
 
Katileigh February 26, 2017
Stephanie... interesting perspective on the use of "your." I think that when we write, we are sometimes listening to the language we would say if we were speaking, but sometimes that colloquial usage doesn't hold up in print. Ms. Mahoney... I'm with you. I love recipes that use language to summon the senses... and make me want to make that food!
 
Ms. M. February 26, 2017
If I can head in a slightly different direction: I love recipes -- reading and executing -- that invite the reader in, marrying experience and technique with the steps. Even though I'm not a huge oatmeal fan, I love making it because of Cook's Illustrated description of toasting raw oatmeal in butter "until golden and fragrant with butterscotch-like aroma." Which also makes for perfect results every time!
 
Stephanie R. February 26, 2017
"Preheat the oven" doesn't bother me, but "Preheat your oven" sends me through the roof. "Add your garlic", "chop your onions", "stir your dry ingredients"... Why do recipes these days strive so hard to flatter the cook rather than what's being cooked?
 
Beth M. February 26, 2017
Please, please break your recipe into simple steps. A tomato sauce with 14 ingredients and 2 steps is an invitation to disaster. It is far too easy to miss what gets added when.
I find it interesting the number of comments mentioning rewriting a recipe. I do it all the time and thought I was just too persnickety wanting everything spelled out logically.
 
marc510 February 26, 2017
Thanks for the your thoughts about recipe writing style. I'll certainly consider them in my next recipe writing projects.

For all of our complaints about recipe writing and cookbooks, it used to be far, far worse. Take, for example, the recipe below from page 9 of the 1818 "The Universal Receipt Book" by Priscilla Homespun (full text at Google Books.). Ingredients are buried in the text and often in vague quantities. (note the call-out for "mushroom catsup" -- in 1818, catsup wasn't always tomato, but made in many varieties, including oyster, walnut, fruit.)

-----
An excellent French Fricasee of Beans so as to resemble the taste of Meat

Take Lima or frost beans and after boiling them sufficiently to eat, brown some butter, taking care to season it well with salt, in an iron bake pan or spider, previously warmed or heated. Put into it your beans, after letting them drain a few moments, and fry them till they begin to turn brown then mix with them a few onions finely chopped or shredded, and continue the frying for a short time longer, adding some parsley. When the beans appear to be nearly cooked, put to them a very little water, and sprinkle them over well with flour from a dredging box, some salt, and a little black pepper, and let them stew for a few minutes. When done stir into them the yolk of an egg beat up with a spoonful of water, to which add a like quantity of vinegar. (A spoonful of mushroom catsup will likewise be found to improve their taste greatly but it should be added when the flour is put to them.)
 
Katileigh February 26, 2017
Hmm. I was an English teacher, but now work in the corporate world. I agree in part with the comments about the use of the "passive voice" in instructions. However, just removing the passive voice doesn't ensure that you are conveying the meaning that you intend. Specifically: Cook the risotto until all of the broth has been absorbed” is different than “Cook the risotto until you’ve added all the broth.” It's more important to clearly describe the desired outcome (absorbed broth) than to describe an action in the active voice that may or may not result in perfectly creamy risotto.
 
Nancy V. February 26, 2017
You must have been a very fine English teacher!
 
mela February 26, 2017
Agreed!
 
Sue F. February 26, 2017
My pet peeve is "do not overmix". Is under-mixing equally as ominous? So unclear.
 
liz S. February 26, 2017
I read and try recipes to learn new ways to cook. If the ingredients are awkwardly listed or instructions seem either too wordy or confusing, I re-write them using my preferred way to list or shorthand. That way, I already have the game-plan in my head.
 
Wandee February 26, 2017
A stalk of celery? No, A RIB of celery is one section of the entire stalk. Maybe twice I've seen the correct term used. RIB! Be precise.
 
Joseph B. February 26, 2017
I think you are confused. A stalk and a rib are the same thing. The whole thing is called a head of celery like a head of cabbage or a head of lettuce.
 
Andrew C. February 25, 2017
My peeve is with a LOT of your recipes on this site. Don't get me wrong, plenty of great recipes, but I'm from Australia, and we don't see Kosher salt in shops here. I know that it's light and flaky and thus 1 teaspoon doesn't equal a teaspoon of cooking salt. I'm pretty sure that in most recipes, salt is salt, and measurements in grams, ounces or whatever mass you care to use makes it easier to 'season to taste' down under.
 
Robin J. February 24, 2017
Another term to avoid is "Reserve", as in "reserve the cooking liquid". The first time my husband cooked something that had this phrase, he treated "reserve" as if it meant "discard". leading to some obvious problems. Some years later, he and a friend were making beer and the recipe said something like "reserve 1/2 cup of the sugar for later" and then "add the reserved sugar just before bottling". The friend used all the sugar in the first step (reserving none) and added more sugar just before bottling, which, if you know about beer making, made for some very foamy beer. I'm not sure why, but apparently 'reserve' is not in many people's vocabulary (or at least not with the right meaning)
 
Lorraine F. February 24, 2017
Some of us have more experience in cooking and baking and don't need all the extra instructions. I think it helps to explain first how to PREP the recipe ready for cooking. Many recipes involve a lot of rinsing, chopping and cutting. I like to explain in my recipes how to prep the recipe first in order of ingredients. I also advise to READ the recipe through a few times to understand how the recipe will be put together and in what order the ingredients will be used. Long explanations are good if the recipe is complicated. Too many words are not necessary if the recipe is simple and easy to put together. I love the way Ina describes food. Good olive oil or vanilla means don't use cheap or artificial ingredients. The taste of the recipe relies on good quality ingredients. I get it loud and clear.
 
HawaiiShine February 24, 2017
As a recipe tester for Leite's Culinaria, I'm taking notes. We strive to provide both weight and volume measure for the reasons people have discussed (for carrots, onions and garlic for example). I better understand why now so thank you for this.
 
Elizabeth T. February 23, 2017
I believe that recipes are written in the imperative mood in the form of "Do this." It looks like the main issue given in the article with the passive voice is in the prepositional phrase starting with "until." This is beyond my grammar knowledge of moods, but I vote for the least amount of words as possible. We are trying to read recipes while cooking or baking after all.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imperative_mood
http://www.linguisticsgirl.com/esl-recipe-lesson-plan-practice-imperative-mood/
https://www.englishpractice.com/improve/changing-imperative-sentence-passive/
 
Elizabeth T. February 23, 2017
Edit: (I don't see how to edit my comment above) After further online grammar review, I'm not sure that the phrase starting with "until" is a prepositional phrase - maybe it is just a phrase. It has been a while since I learned those definitions.
 
Catherine M. February 22, 2017
You hit mine with "season to taste" especially the comment that not all seasonings are salt!
 
Stephanie February 22, 2017
I think it all comes down to precision of language. Sometimes that will mean that passive voice is, well, passable. Sometimes you do simply 'set aside' a component of the recipe. Sometimes, 'add lemon juice and more white pepper, to taste' is more appropriate than 'season'. I'm not asking a recipe writer to assume I'm incompetent, just to assume that I'm not a mind reader. Say what you mean and mean what you say!
 
Chris February 22, 2017
"Preheat the oven" doesn't generally bother me...unless a recipe tells me to do that first and then the recipe proceeds to take far, far longer than the amount of time it takes an oven to heat up. The most extreme cases are when a recipe needs to be chilled in the fridge for a significant amount of time ("at least two hours or overnight,"...but I was still told to preheat at the very beginning -- those really leave me scratching my head!
 
Sandra M. February 26, 2017
Hear hear! That makes me nuts... I do always read through a number of times before starting a new recipe, but it would make far more sense to instruct turning on the oven (Heat? Preheat? Doesn't both me one way or the other) after the time stopping instruction has been completed.
 
JMarie February 22, 2017
Recipes that do not give weight or volume specifics are a pet peeve for me. The size of an onion or apple can vary greatly, dependent on the variety and season. One cup of chopped onion versus one onion, chopped, could be two entirely different quantities.
 
ErinM724 February 23, 2017
Yes, agreed!
 
Valhalla February 22, 2017
I can deal, or ignore, any of these quirks. What I cannot tolerate (but seemingly have to, as a 40 plus human with a bank account large enough to buy, and a preference for, print cookbooks) is light and overly small print. even with reading glasses, I have to use a magnifier to read recipes. FIX IT, editors!
 
Lynn D. February 22, 2017
It drives me crazy than The New York Times does not list water in the list of ingredients. An example is Martha Rose Schulman's Provencal Greens soup. It is true that in a soup recipe you'll likely notice it needs water, but if a recipe calls for a half cup or so, it's easy to overlook it.
 
Maria Z. February 23, 2017
Such a great point, Lynn! I, too, appreciate when water appears in the ingredients list.
 
Nancy February 22, 2017
Agree with you on the inane "preheat the oven." When I write or adapt a recipe it always becomes "heat the oven."
Hadn't thought about them, but agree with your advice and resolve on "combine" and "set aside."
 
Nancy February 22, 2017
And then there's "reserve."
It's like set aside...could do with some specific directions instead of the "one size fits all" instruction.
 
creamtea February 22, 2017
The passive voice in recipe writing has its uses. "Simmer until you have cooked the pasta" vs "simmer until the pasta is tender"; "roast the chicken until you have cooked the chicken." vs. roast the chicken until it is cooked through."
"Legendary Editor Judith Jones" may have had her preferences, and her reasons, but that doesn't mean that I cannot have mine.
 
Angie A. February 24, 2017
+1 was just coming here to express something similar. "Cook until you've added all the liquid" actually means something totally different than "cook until all the liquid has been absorbed." In the first, a novice cook may consider the dish done once they've added the liquid, even if not absorbed. Passive voice is necessary when the subject of the sentence which must behave in a certain way happens to be the food and not the cook.
 
Beth S. February 25, 2017
You could write, "add liquid as the rice absorbs it."
 
JulieBoulangerie February 22, 2017
Not exactly a writing quirk, but in a cookbook, I want it edited so that ingredients and all of the instructions are on the two open pages- left and right. Don't make me flip a page back and forth!
 
Sue W. February 22, 2017
Totally agree
 
Deri February 22, 2017
Good cookbook editors strive for having the full recipe on one spread, but sometimes it's just not possible. Especially if there is a picture for every recipe (which is also something cookbook buyers clamor for).
Deri Reed, food editor
 
Mary R. February 26, 2017
Totally agree as well..Side by side writing of the ingredients and the instructions allows you to refer to the ingredients and it's use in the method without having to scroll up and down electronically ( especially when using a tablet or phone) or search up and down (or flip pages) when your recipe is paperbased. I usually prep all my ingredients but with a new recipe this can still be frustrating.
 
Jennifer February 21, 2017
"Every English teacher admonishes students to avoid writing in passive voice": No. Not true. The passive voice can be well or poorly used (and you may judge whether I have just used it well or poorly). This is true for recipes as for any genres.
 
ErinM724 February 21, 2017
I like to see not only the number of servings, but the amount of food per serving, to make it easier to portion food for a meal and then leftovers.
 
Maria Z. February 23, 2017
Thank you, Erin! Yes, this is another one I've been giving a lot of thought to lately.
 
Darlene February 21, 2017
There's a recipe on this site that I love (and so do many others), but it is so wordy, it takes up two entire pages, with text stretching margin to margin, for a fairly simple recipe. There are many unnecessary instructions like "lift lid and stir" (i.e., "stir") and variables for every step (If it's too salty, add more water. If it's not salty enough, add more salt). I re-wrote it down to a single page with mostly single sentence steps as it's easier to work from that way. My personal preference is for recipes to show all the prep steps first so if a recipe isn't arranged that way, I just re-arrange it. That said, I do like conversational recipes, especially if the writer is a good story teller. One minor pet peeve, recipes that tell you to "use a nice bread" or "use a good olive oil" - sometimes there's legitimate reason for that, other times it comes off as snooty.
 
Stephanie February 22, 2017
I completely agree on the vague quality descriptors. The merit of her recipes aside, Ina Garten is among the worst offenders. Working at a gourmet food store, people would often come in and ask for "good vanilla" (we knew that meant an Ina recipe). Of course, I'm fairly certain that what she means is that you should use pure (not imitation) vanilla and trust your source - but the novice home cook doesn't always know that. I guess I'm advocating specificity... "use a freshly baked sourdough (instead of 'nice') bread" or "use pure olive oil, you should find the taste of the oil on its own pleasant" or "pure vanilla extract (instead of 'good').
 
DocLsk15 February 21, 2017
Some great food for thought! But as a blogger, I find myself respecting others citing their recipe sources (even when they tweak them) and being disappointed in those who should but don't.
 
Susan B. February 21, 2017
I tend to not overthink stuff like this. My motto ; Don't sweat the petty stuff.
 
ingefaer February 22, 2017
I totally agree - I find this piece a bit nitpick.
 
Kate K. February 21, 2017
Specifying "freshly ground black pepper". I know already, and everyone else who owns a pepper mill or mortar and pestle knows too.
 
Nancy February 22, 2017
Ah, but Kate, that one is a reflection of historical practice (people using dead dull black pepper sold already ground from a jar that was maybe years old) and educational necessity (teaching people that there was a good difference in using a peppermill).
Granted, without context it now sounds obvious & maybe condescending.
 
enbe February 21, 2017
As to "preheat the oven" - this step is always first, even at the beginning of a long-prep recipe. As always, I read to the end of the recipe, figure out how much time it'll take, and then preheat when appropriate, and I understand that it's a convention to put it first, but not particularly environmentally conscious for those sticking to the recipe as written. How about: you'll need an oven heated to 350degrees starting at step 3
 
Deri February 22, 2017
Nope, it's not a convention to put preheating first. In well-edited recipes, the heating (preheating?) instructions go 10 to 15 minutes before the oven is needed. Recipes that include oven heating long before it's needed have not been edited well.
Deri Reed, food editor
 
Heidi R. February 22, 2017
Not all ovens are created equal. Some come to temperature faster or slower than others...just my observations.
 
Kathleen February 21, 2017
Recipes that just jump right into the instructions without a separate ingredient list. I don't want to have to read through the recipe 15 times to make sure I've gotten all the ingredients because whoever wrote it was too lazy to give me a list.
 
Joseph B. February 21, 2017
I agree with the pet peeve about ingredients that are in the list but not the recipe. My pet peeve is the opposite, ingredients that show up in the recipe but not in the list. You look at a recipe with five ingredients, but suddenly they are adding water, and salt & pepper, and butter, and oil. If you are going to have me use it, list it.
 
AntoniaJames February 21, 2017
So many great ideas, and perspectives. Nice to see some intelligent discussion about the Jones pet-peeves that seem to be embraced by many just because they were uttered by Jones. Please. Life is too short.
My pet peeve? Well, I have a number of them, but most are preferences that are increasingly out of the mainstream, i.e., from their prevalence in the cookbooks being published these days, apparently seem to be not just acceptable, but even required by editors (photos of beautiful people at staged parties with unconvincing smiles, photos of cookbook authors having absolutely nothing to do with any recipe, photos of the author's dog, etc.). i see that as filler that's taking up valuable real estate that should be used for recipes or tips / technique. Obviously, don't get me started on the trends I wish weren't happening . . .
Biggest pet peeve: when cookbook authors presume that I care what *they* think about the way I cook. Yes, that sounds bizarre, but it comes up in the somewhat offensive, "[If you want to do it this other, easier/lazier way], don't worry, I won't judge." No. Please, just no. Needless to say, any other self-centered / self-absorbed comments or "voice" are also deal killers. ;o)
 
creamtea February 21, 2017
"Bake off" bugs the hell out of me. The verb is "bake." Period. Preposition unnecessary. Unless you're entering the Pillsbury competition.
 
AntoniaJames February 21, 2017
Yes! Thank you, creamtea!
 
Jenn K. February 23, 2017
Yes!! I hate "bake off"!!!
 
Anne J. February 21, 2017
Actually I kind of like "set aside". It's sort of shorthand for ok done with this for the moment, can do the next thing.
 
Markella B. February 21, 2017
I hate when recipes say one cup butter, or half a cup, or 1/4 cup, etc. without giving you the weight equivalent. How the heck am I supposed to measure a block of cold butter in a cup?
 
ErinM724 February 21, 2017
Agreed. I'd love to see that for all ingredients, especially as I try to learn how much a serving size of something is.
 
Elizabeth T. February 22, 2017
In the US at least, regular butter sticks have the cup and tablespoon measurements printed on the paper. Just cut the butter stick where the appropriate line is. You can do this through the paper if your knife is sharp enough. Being a baker, I do appreciate weight equivalents, but this is why butter is listed in this way in US recipes.
 
Markella B. February 22, 2017
Unfortunately, I don't live in the US. I live in Greece and here butter comes in 250 gram blocks. The increments on the paper are also in grams. I used to live in the US and I appreciated the cup and tablespoon indications on the sticks. On the up side, here in Europe, butter tastes better because of the higher fat content.
 
Elizabeth T. February 22, 2017
I thought that you might not be in the US, which is why I explained why the butter measurements are that way in US recipes. I have a lot of experience of trying to follow recipes from other countries, so I realize how tricky it can be. A converter (there are many online if this one isn't good enough): http://www.traditionaloven.com/conversions_of_measures/butter_converter.html Enjoy your yummy butter.
 
Markella B. February 23, 2017
Thank you Elizabeth for your advise! Happy cooking!
 
mela February 26, 2017
Markella, they taught us how to do this in school. Put water in a measuring cup, note the amount, then add butter chunks and submerge them until your liquid reaches the desired level. It's Archimedes' Principle.
This is insanely tedious though. And for many recipes, and all baking, often inaccurate.
I now use weights. I live in North America, and immediately convert recipes I'll be making again. The Europeans have got it right.
 
mela February 26, 2017
Elizabeth, do North American recipes describe butter in cups and tablespoons because that's how the packages are marked, or are the packages marked that way because that's how the recipes are written? I'm inclined to the second choice because it's not only butter....
 
Annada R. February 21, 2017
Just remembered my pet peeve with recipes. I see recipes that have a particular ingredient, which is not mentioned at all in the recipe. Drives me insane! Then I go back and forth between ingredients and instructions, thinking that I'm not understanding something or it is something so basic that the writer did not care to mention it in the instructions.
 
Annada R. February 21, 2017
Awesome article! Just one of the many F52 does. Something so obvious but never thought about it until it was on F52.
 
Maria Z. February 23, 2017
Thanks, Annada! So happy to hear it!
 
Deri February 21, 2017
Hmmm. As a cookbook editor for 20-plus years, I have a few comments.
Passive voice: I don't have a problem with it, especially if you want to avoid so many "you"s throughout the steps. Also, the second pair of instructions you give are not the same: "Cook the risotto until all of the broth has been absorbed” as opposed to “Cook the risotto until you’ve added all the broth.” All the broth being absorbed is NOT the same as having added all the broth. More correct for the second (non-passive) version would be "Cook the risotto until the rice has absorbed all the broth."
Combine doesn't bother me, Goddess Judith notwithstanding. She has a point that you should be more precise (with "whisk" etc.), but when I'm editing a recipe, I don't usually know the author's choice, and indeed she may not have one. And "In a bowl, combine the..." is a helluva lot better than "In a bowl, add the ...."
Set aside: Again I don't mind, as long as it is not used right away (ie, the next step). It can be helpful to the cook, to let her know that you aren't using it right away.
Preheat: Oh, so many opinions and angst! I worked for a publisher once who insisted on "Heat the oven" because they once got a letter from someone saying that they didn't have a "preheat" button on their oven, so what should they do? At this point, "preheat" is just convention, but you're right: It doesn't make much sense!

—Deri Reed, food editor
 
Elizabeth T. February 22, 2017
Thank you! The risotto example and all of the "you"s were bugging me. I rewrite all of the recipes that I use with the least amount of words as possible. I don't have time to deal with reading long sentences while cooking.
 
wisekaren February 21, 2017
I'm a cookbook editor, and I find "Combine" to be very useful at certain times. Granted, it's better to use more precise language (such as "whisk together") when you can, but sometimes all you're doing is combining, as in "Combine all the ingredients in a blender," which I don't think is any worse than "Put all the ingredients in a blender." I also find "set aside" to be useful at times—e.g., you whisk together the stir-fry sauce and set it aside while you start stir-frying the veggies. The thing that irks me much more is "adding" something to an empty vessel, as in "Add the oil to a large skillet." Better to say "Heat the oil in a large skillet" or "Pour the oil into a large skillet" or whatever. And lately I'm seeing a lot of "adding in" and "adding back" (e.g., "Add in the almonds" or "Add the chicken back to the pan"), which make me wince.
 
Maria Z. February 23, 2017
Great point, Karen! Thank you!
 
Melissa O. February 21, 2017
Salt to taste, for raw, stuffed chicken breasts. I'm not going to taste the raw chicken to find out how much salt to add. A suggested amount of salt would be nice.
 
Clara C. February 21, 2017
When an ingredient is used more than once in a recipe, I want the exact quantity/measurement of that ingredient listed each time it's used IN the "step" or "direction". This seems like a no brainer, but unfortunately it's a common issue I have found in recipes I try.
 
copywolf February 22, 2017
Yes! Exactly what I was going to say! How many times have I dumped a cup of sugar into batter only to find that I was supposed to save a quarter cup for later.
 
J February 21, 2017
None of the listed quirks bother me: I can figure it out. I never rely on unknown internet recipes, including most bloggers (with some notable exceptions such as Wizenberg whom I have come to trust) unless the author is a known, trusted source (for example, Lebovitz, Greenspan, Ruhlman, Bullock-Prado and many more) because, all too often, the recipes aren't tested and they're full of errors. Likewise, some celebrity chef recipes make me crazy: the best example I can think of is cooking dried beans from scratch. Recipe will say, "simmer the beans for about an hour." Well, Celebrity Chef, YOU buy your beans from Rancho Gordo, they were harvested last summer, and they probably will cook in an hour. However, my beans came from a bag in the supermarket and will probably take me 3 hours -- or more -- to cook. I've actually had some lovely email conversations with respected chefs/authors about errors in their recipes: for example, one reversed the ratio of polenta to water in her book and I was thinking "what am I missing?" But we talked via email and she was floored that no one had ever pointed out this obvious error to her. Finally, in one of her earlier (of many) cookbooks, a very famous cook/cookbook author/TV personality had a recipe for a dish that had to be baked. Her recipe never said, "put the dish in the oven and bake it." I've read at least 1,000 cookbooks (I take them out from my public library), and I guess I'm sort of a collector of recipe bloopers.
 
cateler February 21, 2017
Not including "divided" in the ingredient list if you'll be using part of the ingredient in one use and then the rest later in a second use. Cannot say how many times I've dumped all of the oil into a bowl when only half of it was intended to be used. Yes, I should read more carefully, but love the caution sign that "divided" provides. And kudos to Fitzie on the onion!
 
JulieBoulangerie February 22, 2017
Yes! and... tell me in the ingredient list how it should be divided! Otherwise, I'm prone to error.
 
Patty February 22, 2017
YES!!!!! Divided into what portions? I was hoping someone would post this ;)
 
copywolf February 22, 2017
The worst!
 
PhillipBrandon February 21, 2017
None of these really bother me (and I think I'm more offput by the second person in an instruction than the passive voice), but I really don't like combining too many actions into one "Step." If it's a recipe I come back to, I'll find myself re-writing things line-by-line so I don't forget to do something.
 
Juliet F. February 21, 2017
All I want is the picture of the finished product and the recipe at the top of the page. I don't want to read about how your sister came to visit on a snowy day and took your shaggy dog for a walk. I don't need an artistic photograph of sesame oil being poured into a bowl. I don't want to scroll and scroll and scroll and wait for an ad to load, and then dismiss a pop-up about getting added to your newsletter before I can click here for the recipe.
 
bellw67 February 23, 2017
That drives me bonkers as well. I don't want to read miles of how you spent your day, or each step photographed, just give me the recipe. And those pop ups, that is so annoying.
 
Maria Z. February 23, 2017
Haha! :) Agreed!
 
Donata February 21, 2017
Amen to this! Nicely done.
 
fitzie February 21, 2017
Recipes that call for one onion diced instead of 1/2 cup diced onion. Onions come in all sizes Give me more clear quantities. This does't just apply to onions.
 
HalfPint February 21, 2017
Amen to this. I avoid these types of recipes like the plague, no matter how tempting they might be. If you can't tell me approximately how much diced onion (or tomatoes, onions, celery, etc), I'm not going to attempt your recipe. I once asked, on Food52, for an approximation. The reply back was "just eyeball it". Really? Eyeball an ingredient for a recipe that I've never heard of and don't have a description or a picture to check that I'm close? No thanks.
 
caninechef February 22, 2017
This formerly bothered me but I have now decided I like the "one onion" idea because it reflects how people actually cook. If I am making something I am familiar with I am just going to select the onion that seems right for the job to me and use the whole thing. Because frankly when I chopped one up and it was a bit more or a bit less than the one cup or whatever was specified I am going to use the whole onion and make do, be it a bit more or a bit less. Same idea for cloves of garlic, I have a pretty good idea where I fall on the garlic intake scale and feel comfortable with using my own judgment on what constitutes a reasonable amount. I do find many recipes in the effort to be foolproof get rather tedious but I usually enjoy the first read and then edit ruthlessly so the whole thing is one page.
 
HalfPint February 22, 2017
@caninechef, if it's a dish/food that you have seen before, then you have some idea about that "one onion". When it's new and never before encountered, it's becomes vital to know how much, even if it's a rough estimate. I want to make a recipe and have it be a success (i.e. the final product was as intended by the recipe writer). I don't want to go my final product to be disappointing or flat out wrong because the "one onion" that I used was twice the amount as the onion in the recipe or not enough.
 
Heather |. February 21, 2017
the "set aside" feels unnecessary to me. also don't like it when the recipe seems to use extraneous bowls for the heck of it.
 
Rebecca B. February 21, 2017
What drives me bonkers is when a recipe instructs you to chop, dice, grate, mince or cube an ingredient just to have you throw it into a food processor or blend it. I LOVE recipes that make it as easy as possible; they usually use phrases like "crumble" and "tear."
 
Sandra M. February 26, 2017
I'm with you here...when did a food processor become a kitchen necessity? I wish that recipes would present instructions with the most low tech kitchen in mind...I don't have nor do I have any intention of buying a food processor I do not have the money, or space, and I don't have the fortitude to clean it every time... I make carrot cake frequently and pull our my flat grater each time. Anid I'm still here to tell the happily satisfied tale!
 
Sarah O. February 21, 2017
Not putting the list of ingredients in the order in which you use them.
 
Tiberia February 22, 2017
This!!!!!!