New & NowFood NewsFood Policy

The Truth About Who Really Eats Fast Food

3 Save

If you like it, save it!

Save and organize all of the stuff you love in one place.

Got it!

If you like something…

Click the heart, it's called favoriting. Favorite the stuff you like.

Got it!

Earlier this month, researchers at the Ohio State University’s Center for Human Resource Research released the results of a study they’d been conducting since 2008 to determine who, exactly, eats fast food. The very term “fast food,” as it’s deployed in an American context, is loaded; beyond being cheap, easy, and nutrient-parched, it’s inextricable from imaginings about class in this country. The study’s most compelling takeaway? Among American baby boomers, there's little variance in fast food consumption habits across socioeconomic strata.

Food in the Time of Obama: The Last 8 Years + How We Ate
+
Food in the Time of Obama: The Last 8 Years + How We Ate

Researchers surveyed 8,000 people from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth, a cohort of baby boomers who'd been studied regularly since 1979, asking them how much fast food—McDonald’s, KFC, Taco Bell, or Burger King, specifically—they ate over the course of a week at three separate time periods: 2008, 2010, and 2012. All respondents were in their 40s or 50s at the time of the survey. Researchers segmented respondents into 10 groups by income. The findings:

Advertisement
  • 79% of respondents, across all income brackets, consumed fast food at least once in those weeks. 23% ate three or more fast food meals in that time period.
  • 80% in the lowest income bracket ate fast food at least once during the study period, compared to 85% of people in the middle income bracket and 75% in the highest.
  • Respondents in the lowest income bracket ate 3.6 fast food meals on average over that period, compared to 4.2 in the middle group and 3.0 in the highest.

Some of the respondents traveled between income groups over the years, but the study found that their consumption habits regarding fast food remained relatively static. What drew respondents to fast food was, more often than not, a lack of leisure time that led to quick and hasty decisions around food.

Read the Work of Pulitzer Finalist Food Critic Laura Reiley
+
Read the Work of Pulitzer Finalist Food Critic Laura Reiley

There are obvious constraints to this study, acknowledged by those who conducted it. For one, the study didn’t go as far to ask what, precisely, respondents consumed when they went to these eateries, especially as some have adopted a nominally health-conscious approach to what they put on their menus. At the very least, the head researcher, Jay Zagorsky, is hopeful that findings like these will help shape policy regarding how to curb obesity in this country more rigorously.

In other words, the work to broaden and enrich how we talk about fast food, and how policy gets shaped around it, doesn’t end with this study. It’s not exactly news that fast food, and the way it's so often framed in this country, is classed: a gravitation towards fast food is associated with the poor and destitute, of economic hardship that gives way to desperation. Consider this myth challenged.

Advertisement

Read the full study, “The association between socioeconomic status and adult fast-food consumption in the U.S.,” here.

Tags: fast food