Popular on Food52
5 Comments
Matt
June 23, 2017
"Luckily, it’s his brother and sister-in-law that will have to deal with all the pomp and circumstance of ruling the country"
The author of this piece doesn't understand how the government of the United Kingdom works do they?
The author of this piece doesn't understand how the government of the United Kingdom works do they?
702551
June 23, 2017
To clarify, the United Kingdom government is run by a parliament and its leader, the prime minister (typically a member of the dominant party of the House of Commons). While the UK is a constitutional monarchy, the royal family does not dictate public policy nor does it have any say in the election of public officials.
Queen Elizabeth II does not "run the country" [sic].
Note that Prince Henry of Wales is fifth in the line of succession to take over for Queen Elizabeth II. He is preceded by his father, Charles, Prince of Wales, his older brother, Prince William, Duke of Cambridge, and his brother's two children, George and Charlotte.
It is unlikely that Prince Harry will ascend to the throne unless all four die and there are no viable issues from George nor Charlotte. If William has more children or if George has his own at some point, Harry will fall even further down the line of succession.
Queen Elizabeth II does not "run the country" [sic].
Note that Prince Henry of Wales is fifth in the line of succession to take over for Queen Elizabeth II. He is preceded by his father, Charles, Prince of Wales, his older brother, Prince William, Duke of Cambridge, and his brother's two children, George and Charlotte.
It is unlikely that Prince Harry will ascend to the throne unless all four die and there are no viable issues from George nor Charlotte. If William has more children or if George has his own at some point, Harry will fall even further down the line of succession.
judy
June 26, 2017
But Not impossible. His Grandmother Elizabeth was, I believe, maybe 5th or 6ht in line and was not brought up to think that she was even close to teh possibility of being Queen. NOt so easy to rule out....
702551
June 27, 2017
The Queen Mother was never realistically in line for the throne. She was the Queen Consort and when her husband George VI died, her daughter Elizabeth II ascended to the throne, not her. Let's remember that it was her brother Edward VIII who gave up the throne by abdicating to marry American Wallis Simpson. I'm not convinced that the same set of rules apply today.
Again, an astounding set of circumstances would have had to occurred for the Queen Mother to become a queen regnant, including the death of her own daughter (Elizabeth II) before her own passing. In the nineteenth century with lower life expectancy, war, and unrest, these scenarios were slightly more plausible, but not in the current era.
Again, an astounding set of circumstances would have had to occurred for the Queen Mother to become a queen regnant, including the death of her own daughter (Elizabeth II) before her own passing. In the nineteenth century with lower life expectancy, war, and unrest, these scenarios were slightly more plausible, but not in the current era.
ErinM724
July 23, 2017
No...Edward was George's brother. So, originally, she could have been 5th or 6th in line (or something) as judy says because Edward probably would have had to marry and produce heirs who would have gotten to the throne before she would, as I'm guessing it would have been Edward's kids and then their kids if it went that long, then George, then her.
See what other Food52 readers are saying.