Popular on Food52
27 Comments
A.E.
October 16, 2018
Excited to see these! I agree with the Pintrest photos. Some of those had unglazed rims. My mother & grandmother had those bowls and used the rims to sharpen knives! Love that! I am always vhecking bowls I find, they're always smoothed from sharpening. But maybe your new bowls will allow me to sharpen my knives?!
Stephanie
June 11, 2018
wow, well i think mixing bowls for one are so much more specific to each task. When making cupcake or cake batter it needs to be somewhat lightweight to account for holding the bowl up to scrape out contents. A pour spout seems useless without a handle and that seems to specific. My preference would be a beautiful, modern interpretation of the stoneware with glossy glaze, just go ahead and let it be heavy and be that bowl that sits out on the counter. Please not too much of a "foot" on the bottom, if I'm saying that right, because that's where dry pockets of flour or mix get trapped. might be nice to fit them with silicon tops for overnight batters, raised waffle batter, or for serving something like a marinated tomato salad that you mix the night before. : )
Steven W.
June 10, 2018
Honestly, the bowl I use 90 % of the time is the 8 cup batter bowl from those house ware parties. They recently changes their design and it's not as good. It's big, heavy glass, has a handle and a spout and while It may not serve for a double bach of bread, it works for a hundred other things.
Suellen N.
June 10, 2018
No spout, pale color, semi-gloss to gloss , shaped like cream vintage stoneware bowls with deep sides, wide rim, 10x5 in size.
PMJ
June 9, 2018
Should be ceramic or stoneware and 4 qts in size. White, not yellow or brown, etc. A handle would be nice like the old batter bars used to have. I actually use my 8 cup measuring cup as a batter mixing vessel.
Debbie S.
June 10, 2018
Love a nice rim to grip. Prefer deep sides for bread rising but shallower sides for cakes and cookies. Found a more oval bowl 🍲 n a thrift shop once and it was excellent for things that needed whisking. Like a matte finish. Colors???? Nothing bright....
Smaug
June 8, 2018
Not strictly relevant maybe, but I've always liked the way the Kitchenaid bowl works- a sturdy stainless steel bowl which attaches very easily to a heavy base- and wished I had something like it that didn't have a mixer head in the way. Stainless steel is so convenient and easy to store- a nesting set could be made to go with one base.
BerryBaby
June 9, 2018
I agree completely! I have a stainless nesting set that I acquired in 1978 and they look as good today as when I first got them.
Ceramic is beating to look at, but way too heavy for me to use. I have a few decorative pieces.
Ceramic is beating to look at, but way too heavy for me to use. I have a few decorative pieces.
BerryBaby
June 9, 2018
Ceramic is BEAUTIFUL to look at...auto correct changes my words when I don’t want it to.
Tracy W.
June 8, 2018
Found my favorite - Green's gripstand - 10 1/4 diameter, made in England. I used to have three of these, down to two now. It has a beveled cut on the bottom so you can sit it flat on an angle. Wide bowl, easy to mix. Dishwasher safe. This one's over 30 years old and still hanging in, but I desperately need one or two more!
702551
June 8, 2018
For better aesthetics, look to the East, specifically Japan.
Something like a traditional suribachi (but without the grooves) would be a great candidate.
Like this:
https://www.nipponboutique.com/en/2761-japanese-suribachi-bowl-911-5-75.html
but with a smooth interior.
The Japanese have a long tradition of making attractive stoneware bowls.
Of course, the sky's the limit in terms of colors, patterns, designs, etc.
I'd take a Japanese bowl over any of the items pictured above. No contest.
Something like a traditional suribachi (but without the grooves) would be a great candidate.
Like this:
https://www.nipponboutique.com/en/2761-japanese-suribachi-bowl-911-5-75.html
but with a smooth interior.
The Japanese have a long tradition of making attractive stoneware bowls.
Of course, the sky's the limit in terms of colors, patterns, designs, etc.
I'd take a Japanese bowl over any of the items pictured above. No contest.
Smaug
June 11, 2018
My knowledge of pottery verges on nonexistent, but what I've seen of Japanese bowls have tended to considerably more delicacy of line than these show.
Sam
June 8, 2018
Four years ago Cook's Illustrated published a test showing side to side whisking was best for everything, while stirring (circular) was ineffectual at everything. So a straight-sided Cambro like square container would be the best design. But you're looking to design something that looks pretty, not one that is the most functional. *smh*
Smaug
June 8, 2018
I wouldn't put too much faith in a Cooks Illustrated test anyway, but anyway you stir in a square bowl the corners are going to be a problem.
Sam
June 8, 2018
It's better than a circle. And while CI is not infallible, in this test they are correct.
Smaug
June 9, 2018
The advantage back to back stirring would have over circular is that it involves changing direction; I have never seen or heard of anyone simply stirring in a circle, which would indeed involve pushing stuff around the edge of the bowl. It is a motion generally used as part of a pattern to clear the sides of the bowl, which of course side to side will never do. I don't see any particular reason why side to side would work better in a square bowl anyway. There is also a great deal of difference between stirring with different implements- whisks, spoons, scrapers, chopsticks, all have quite different properties.
Sam
June 9, 2018
If you've never seen a seen or heard of a person "simply stirring in a circle," you have now. I managed over 60 restaurants in my career & I had to retrain dozens of prep people who stirred in only one way. Using a whink properly was one of the first things we taught.
Smaug
June 9, 2018
Well, you're probably right, I've taught people in various activities over the years and they do find extraordinary ways to do things badly. If you want to stir something, you need to change directions and motions frequently and above all, pay attention to the results of whatever you're doing. But I don't think you could get much done by simply stirring back and forth in a square bowl- for starters, a wavy line would be more efficient than a straight line, leading to some really strange bowls. But the real question is, WHEN is Food52 going to come up with an edit function?
Sam
June 9, 2018
A lot of sites could use edit functions! I mentioned Cambros in my first post & they are a staple in the foodservice industry. Whether by luck or design, all of our products mixed in Cambros were well stirred. lol
Join The Conversation