🔕 🔔

My Basket ()

All questions

Having trouble finding the right size pan for caramel

I have a sort of weird dilemma when I'm making caramel. When I use a pan large enough to accommodate all the bubbling, the actual caramel is too shallow to reach the sensor part of a candy thermometer (i've tried with a couple different designs), so I've never been able to get an accurate read from the thermometer. Had so-so luck using my eyes and my gut. Any solution to this?

asked by UhOhSarah about 6 years ago
4 answers 3483 views
766e7ce3 8394 4788 8337 bbd8a8d3a07e  5.15.11 coconut macaroons best sm
added about 6 years ago

I have this exact problem every time I make toffee. My solution? I learned how to judge it accurately without a thermometer. It just takes some practice and you'll find it's actually easier (I think). Candy cooks differently depending on all sorts of factors: moisture in the air, material of the pot, moisture in the sugar, etc. When you're judging it by consistency, color, and taste, you can be more accurate than just going by a temperature on the thermometer. At least, the times I've been able to use a thermometer to get an accurate reading for candy, I've always messed up the batch by relying too much on the numbers and not enough on my gut.

It helps a lot if you start plopping little samples into ice water and tasting them. You'll find the consistency and taste to be a great indicator. Remember, though: I'm speaking mainly from experience making toffee, not caramel.

Fff96a46 7810 4f5c a452 83604ac1e363  dsc03010
added about 6 years ago

I use thermometers to check the temp of egg whites for buttercream, to make sure my steak is on the rare side of medium (and to make sure the hillbilly's rib roast is dead and burnt), for deep frying and tempering chocolate.

Instead of a thermometer, I rely on my eyes and my gut like you do, along with a few shotglasses of cold water, like Syronai, when making candies. I use a stainless steel skillet (Tramontina, as good as All-Clad at 1/4 the price) for caramel because I can watch as the sugar begins to change color; it could be all in my head, but I think the skillet makes the caramelization process come about quicker. I can't see those changes when I use cast iron or non-stick saucepans. One day, I might splurge on a nice 2-quart All-Clad saucier. Until then, I'll make do with what I have, telling myself all the while that this is how Laura Ingalls Wilder did it.

84baef1b 1614 4c3d a895 e859c9d40bd1  chris in oslo

Chris is a trusted source on General Cooking

added about 6 years ago

I think you've exactly defined the problem! If you want to rely on a thermometer for making caramel, you have to use a less optimal pan. If caramel making is a skill you're going to use a lot, it's better to forget the thermometer and get to know the process better. It may mean a little investment in time and sugar, but I think it's the way to go. David Lebovitz has some suggestions that might be helpful: http://www.davidlebovitz... and http://www.davidlebovitz...

He doesn't recommend relying on a thermometer either.

F8c5465c 5952 47d4 9558 8116c099e439  dscn2212

Cynthia is a trusted source on Bread/Baking.

added about 6 years ago

You're right betteirene - the skillet does move things along more quickly. More surface area, shallower mass, water cooks off more rapidly. Too, with the nice shallow depth, you get a really good visual on the color.

Let's Keep in Touch!

Get the recipes and features that have us talking, plus first dibs on events and limited-batch products.

(Oh, and $10 off your order of $50 or more in the Food52 Shop, too.)

Please enter a valid email address.