Bake
Gooey Butter Cake
Popular on Food52
13 Reviews
Ceramic
February 5, 2024
Finally got this recipe right after a few fails-- a couple times bc I'm not used to yeast, and a couple more because of overbaking. Glad I tried again because it's very tasty and decadent seeming, fun when you cut into it with the gooey/molten center. When you take it out of the oven it's not just the very center that's liquid-- it's the inner 2/3 of the cake. As in runny, not just wobbly. It firms up a lot, but not all the way, as it cools. I used a little less sugar than the recipe calls for. For the bottom half I used some whole wheat flour mixed in with the regular and wished I hadn't as that part was a bit drier than I would have liked. For the top part I used a little almond flour mixed into the regular, and that part came out great.
Megan
December 28, 2018
The BEST cake so far I have made in years...I cooked it a bit too long, but it’s still delicious. This is a definite make again
Cassie W.
January 7, 2018
I baked this in a 10"x10" white ceramic baking dish for exactly 35 minutes. Waited 3 hours for it to cool completely to room temperature before serving. It's amazingly gooey and rich! An absolute hit with everyone!
Cassie W.
January 7, 2018
In hindsight, I think I will make this exactly the same way but bake 3-5 minutes longer to set the filling just a touch more.
Aileen V.
March 27, 2017
I made everything step by step, but my cake did not rise. Measured everything correctly but confused on what went wrong. I made this late afternoon, home was room temperature so I had no warm spots to place it to rise. Could it be that?
asbrink
October 31, 2016
Here is Deb's recipe, BTW:
https://smittenkitchen.com/2010/03/st-louis-gooey-butter-cake/
https://smittenkitchen.com/2010/03/st-louis-gooey-butter-cake/
asbrink
October 31, 2016
So I baked this cake and I actually found that it wasn't sweet ENOUGH. Don't get me wrong--it was very sweet--but authentic St. Louis gooey butter cake is TOOTHACHINGLY sweet and meant to be so. I've made Melissa Clark's NYTimes recipe as adapted by Deb Perelman of Smitten Kitchen many times and eaten gooey butter cake with my husband's family in St. Louis, and Clark's version is absolutely perfect.
Bittman's recipe has the same amount of sugar in the gooey layer, but in superfine instead of granulated, which makes it far less sweet, and far less gooey, I theorize, because that quantity of granulated sugar in Clark's recipe very much lends to the structure of the cake.
I tried this recipe to switch it up from my usual and was super disappointed.
Bittman's recipe has the same amount of sugar in the gooey layer, but in superfine instead of granulated, which makes it far less sweet, and far less gooey, I theorize, because that quantity of granulated sugar in Clark's recipe very much lends to the structure of the cake.
I tried this recipe to switch it up from my usual and was super disappointed.
KF O.
October 25, 2016
Recently baked this cake and it was very good. The mix of textures and the not overly sweet taste was enjoyable. While this is not a cake you can whip up quickly the result was worth the time and resources to make.
Pamela_in_Tokyo
October 19, 2016
I've never had this cake, but there is just way too much sugar in it. I'd like to reduce the topping at least by 1/2 a cup..... many older recipes seem to have way too much sugar.... to my way of thinking.
KellyDC
October 6, 2016
I wish this recipe had a photo of the full cake after baking, because the surface of a true butter cake has a distinct look to it.
See what other Food52ers are saying.