On Black & Highly Flavored, co-hosts Derek Kirk and Tamara Celeste shine a light on the need-to-know movers and shakers of our food & beverage industry.
Listen NowPopular on Food52
7 Comments
Suzanne M.
November 18, 2015
I so agree with you all and Brenda, I made my comment because I too have an autoimmune disease and I try to watch for bad stuff in my food. We grow some. This is complicated by our age and health now I depend more and more on prepared foods from the grocery.
I do hope all you extremely articulated ladies go to the FDA page highlighted above and have a say as well.
I do hope all you extremely articulated ladies go to the FDA page highlighted above and have a say as well.
Brenda B.
November 21, 2015
I think we all need to form more groups or join existing groups who are going to go after Congress. The FDA won't move without them. Groups can possibly make change, but individuals usually can not. You have to fight the big business lobbyists on that area too. Money makes things happen and they have lots and lots of it. Other countries won't tolerate the things that we just accept. Suzanne Mann - knowing you have the auto-immune issues too, you realize just how important labeling is to those of us who suffer with them. This is my fourth. All of these processed and genetically modified foods are hurting our health. I really worry about my grandchildren even more.
Bec
November 18, 2015
I agree, Nancy-that the word 'natural' does not mean it is 'healthy'. Good point.
Nancy
November 18, 2015
"Natural" has received a halo effect when considered in opposition to man-made or commercial, as if those were negative things. But it has no inherent positive or healthful meaning. Remember, cyanide and arsenic are naturally occurring in food, plants, earth, water.
Bec
November 18, 2015
Natural is misleading I think. When there is a packet of lollies in front of me, the label of the packet should not read '...natural...'. Lollies don't grow naturally. They are man made. The packet could read 'use of natural colouring' for example. What do you think?
Brenda B.
November 18, 2015
I have a hard time with the labeling, and I have a real problem trusting. I will never forget a video I watched: committee meeting with a food company representative about "complete" labeling. The representative felt it was too much for the consumer to follow. The committee chair congressman agreed and said that people aren't smart enough to understand too much detail. Sigh!!! I have an auto-immune disorder that is escalated by eating the wrong things. I need to focus on non-GMO, organic, non-dairy, and low sugar, and gluten-free. It really limits me and hurts my budget, but what else can I do? I am questioning where natural really falls. I think labeling should be clearer. Natural just muddies the water. AND - who determines what it will really mean - I am having a hard time trusting big business. Greed is the name of their game. I would rather read a few more words: no preservatives, no dyes including no bugs, no fillers, no chemicals, no antibiotics, etc. I don't want to guess what they mean - one company might see it one way and another see it totally differently. I also want to know where it is grown or made - not just the distributor. That is another trick they use. ex. wild vs. farm-raised; farm-raised in China and then distributed in the US. It is so misleading and on top of that the product is - geez, I can only say nasty.
Suzanne M.
November 17, 2015
If organic means no added chemicals,in sprays, fertilizers, dips, or food that the animal/product we eat has been subjected to then why have natural at all uless it is used along side of organic to designate a non geneticly altered product? Or add non genetically in with the organic and leave the confusing natural off entirely. Who ever heard of anything natural that has five to seven ingredients? I have seen things labled this way!
See what other Food52 readers are saying.