Popular on Food52
171 Comments
Alma D.
July 5, 2017
I love this site and you guys for putting it together! The politics of food is undeniable! I'm so happy that you present all the views! Thanks, I love learning!
Derek F.
February 15, 2017
I applaud your perspective that food is political. Much more so if you live in a community where you are an outsider without access to the things you know how to cook and eat cost effectively. As an Asian American, when I moved to the central coast of California to an 85% white town, I was surrounded by excellent food, wine, and farm country, but I was also extremely disconnected from the foods and ingredients I knew and grew up with. In communities like that, East Asian food, except for Japanese, are considered cheap, weird, or takeout and that kind of mentality really limits earnest appreciation or discussion about whole food cultures. I ended up teaching myself French cooking techniques as a result, which was great, but I also know nothing about Chinese or Singaporean cooking techniques as a result even though I'm ethnically Chinese myself. That's where the internet has provided so much opportunity to learn diverse cooking techniques and I hope Food52 embraces this more.
I loved the idea about sharing recipes from all religious holiday's as a step towards a more inclusive and diverse food culture at Food52. Being located in New York is also great, there are so many immigrant communities that Food52 could reach out to and learn from. Personally I'd like to see more articles where you're going to somebody's house that isn't a famous food blogger but is no less respected as a home cook in their own community and learning how they prepare meals for their families and communities.
I loved the idea about sharing recipes from all religious holiday's as a step towards a more inclusive and diverse food culture at Food52. Being located in New York is also great, there are so many immigrant communities that Food52 could reach out to and learn from. Personally I'd like to see more articles where you're going to somebody's house that isn't a famous food blogger but is no less respected as a home cook in their own community and learning how they prepare meals for their families and communities.
Stockton,NJ
February 15, 2017
As I understand it, your intentions of this thread was to start a conversation about how you could use your platform to encourage people to listen to each other. I agree with you that there is a clear division in our country that is unmistakably politically charged. By making a statement about how "we think food is inescapably political" the conversation thread led to differences in political beliefs and opinions and not too many ideas on getting people to listen to each other with respect to agree to disagree.
I feel this is what happens when people are disconnected from one another and why it is easy to be drawn into combative conversations where no one is listening. Framing your discussion questions in a way that promotes positive discussion may help. Also, when you give your thoughts and opinions before the discussions take place, there seems to be an awful lot of discussion that is defending you and criticizing each other.
Food can also be about connection. Information about where our food comes from and how it is raised is very informative, we appreciate that, but food goes further than that..it is also eaten and shared. Sometimes, we just have to check our opinions at the door. That doesn't mean we oaren't entitled to them, it just me that there is a time and place. Being a great cook can mean more about bringing people together and how you host, than the story behind the mushrooms being served. Being connected to the food you are eating can be important, but so is being connected to the people you are sharing it with. I guess, of course, that you do have the ability to only invite people that agree with you. But was that your intention? Maybe not, but by taking opinions out of this thread, ask yourself if your original intention of getting people to listen to each other was achieved. Not everyone loves a good argument, besides it can be bad for digestion, lol!
I feel this is what happens when people are disconnected from one another and why it is easy to be drawn into combative conversations where no one is listening. Framing your discussion questions in a way that promotes positive discussion may help. Also, when you give your thoughts and opinions before the discussions take place, there seems to be an awful lot of discussion that is defending you and criticizing each other.
Food can also be about connection. Information about where our food comes from and how it is raised is very informative, we appreciate that, but food goes further than that..it is also eaten and shared. Sometimes, we just have to check our opinions at the door. That doesn't mean we oaren't entitled to them, it just me that there is a time and place. Being a great cook can mean more about bringing people together and how you host, than the story behind the mushrooms being served. Being connected to the food you are eating can be important, but so is being connected to the people you are sharing it with. I guess, of course, that you do have the ability to only invite people that agree with you. But was that your intention? Maybe not, but by taking opinions out of this thread, ask yourself if your original intention of getting people to listen to each other was achieved. Not everyone loves a good argument, besides it can be bad for digestion, lol!
Smaug
February 8, 2017
As this discussion continues to rage on long after the article appeared, I feel I should point out once again that there has been virtually nothing on this site that could be called a political discussion, only a discussion of whether politics would be appropriate, and some discussion of how implementation of some government programs might affect consumers as individuals.
Susan
February 8, 2017
Go you! If not impossible to be apolitical at this particular moment, it's at the very least irresponsible. Public policy affects each and every one of us in so many parts of our daily lives (health, education, food) that we can't afford to ignore it, or pretend it doesn't matter. Civilized discourse and intelligent critical thought is as vital to the strength of our citizenry as ever. Keep it up.
Dana R.
February 8, 2017
Trying to delete my account but can not find the option to do it on my account profile or account settings please advise.
Meredith R.
February 7, 2017
Until we Americans get involved in the politics of food there will always be an underclass, hungry, homelessness, sexism, enviormental harm homophobia, we just don't pay the correct price for the food we eat.
Dione H.
February 6, 2017
Thank for remaining true to what you believe, without the divisiveness of what is happening in the US.
Sean R.
February 4, 2017
PLEASE, Amanda and Merrill, PLEASE moderate the comments section!!
If you don't have commenting guidelines, the poison of anonymity washes everywhere. I think this is a great example of a popular, respectful comments section with guidelines like, Stay on Topic, Be Respectful of Other Commenters, Don't Feed the Trolls, and more. http://tomandlorenzo.com/tom-lorenzo-community-guidelines/
PLEASE consider removing inappropriate comments and banning hateful accounts. It'll make visiting Food52 so much more positive!
If you don't have commenting guidelines, the poison of anonymity washes everywhere. I think this is a great example of a popular, respectful comments section with guidelines like, Stay on Topic, Be Respectful of Other Commenters, Don't Feed the Trolls, and more. http://tomandlorenzo.com/tom-lorenzo-community-guidelines/
PLEASE consider removing inappropriate comments and banning hateful accounts. It'll make visiting Food52 so much more positive!
Dana R.
February 2, 2017
Safe starting point or not....after reading posts below I must emphatically say No Politics. They are not a good appetizer .. in fact I am to stressed out to read cook or eat.
Dana R.
February 2, 2017
If you choose, you can relate politics to every topic in the world. If you choose, you can just as easily avoid to make that correlation. Finally if you choose to make a political statement those who come hear for peace, enjoyment or just damn good recipes can choose to unsubscribe. Thank you
Sheila D.
February 2, 2017
If you wish to unsubscribe, do so. Life includes both food and fear, created by those who should be protecting us. We need to support each other.
Saffron3
February 2, 2017
I come here daily, read and get ideas. Great food. I looked for this thread because I want to hear attitudes that are different from mine. Too much of this current national discourse is they said, they said, anger bubbling up, salt on wounds. It is difficult to find civilized opinionated discussion today, right now. I appreciate the effort for that. If you cannot discuss the social and political sidebars around food, don't get upset, just go read about great soups and breads. This site has hundreds of great topics. I don't understand why a few discussions closed away from all those other topics are offensive to some folks. Thanks.
amanda S.
February 2, 2017
So tired that politics has to permeate ever part of life. Everyday I am forced fed a diet of opinion many of which border on crazy and hysterical. While the same peope refuse to consider any level of decent or diversity of views. Total intolerence. So I will no longer shop on Food52. I hate to be like this but I don't need a lecture with my shopping. I am sure others will feel differently as is their right
mary M.
February 2, 2017
Well, I do agree, politics and food are inextricably intertwined. However, there are two sides to every story and this site continues to only present one side. What about the people (and wow, yes there are many!) that are indeed happy that Mexican imported produce may now fall under tariff restrictions and they might be able to regain their footholds as American farmers and growers? What about the sugar and rice farmers that are pleased that their factories may reopen? What about the shrimpers and crawfish farmers who have been struggling for years to battle against the Chinese imports? Not one story on the plight of the "deplorables" in the South or Midwest and how they may actually boost the economy by providing more jobs at home and increase their productions within our great country.
This was only one story in the past few months that I had to read and "hold my nose"-- the puerile stink of slanted "journalism" at its finest. Yes, there are many other stories out there in food and politics that are vastly underreported here.
I think if you want to insist that politics has a place here at F52, please make sure that you show all sides of it. Trust me, there's a whole lot more to this country's food story than Michelle's garden.
This was only one story in the past few months that I had to read and "hold my nose"-- the puerile stink of slanted "journalism" at its finest. Yes, there are many other stories out there in food and politics that are vastly underreported here.
I think if you want to insist that politics has a place here at F52, please make sure that you show all sides of it. Trust me, there's a whole lot more to this country's food story than Michelle's garden.
Panfusine
February 2, 2017
I'm with you, those ARE issues that should be highlighted. I believe Perennial Plate had a series a couple of years ago traveling to rural America and spending time with residents there.
Saffron3
February 2, 2017
Maybe you can write an article. I agree I'd like to know more about the corporate agro business and how smaller farmers are being held back.
duckfat
February 2, 2017
And where will the farm workers come from? How can American farmers reclaim their foothold without workers? BTW, Corporate "farms" are what have been hurting small farmers.
mary M.
February 3, 2017
Actually, the industries I referenced are doing fine worker-wise. Sugar cane is harvested (and planted) entirely by machinery these days, fyi. Many other crops are also done this same way. Crawfishers and shrimpers have plenty of local Louisiana laborers, without needing to depend on an sort of immigrant labor. I know plenty of people that run boats "on the side" and we all have friends willing to spend a few hours fishing. There is no scarcity of laborers around here, contrary to popular opinion. Sugar cane is not harmed by corporate farms, only by the current lack of processors/refineries. Domino Sugar closed their Louisiana factory about 2 years ago due to the mass importation of (cheaper) sugar from Colombia and other parts of South America. I have quite a few friends that were working their own land and selling directly to the processors, but when the processors close up shop, they are unable to do this. They have had to move to other crops, in order to continue to work their land. There are many other industries facing the same challenges- sweet potatoes, rice, etc. If our country continues to allow other countries to dump our markets with cheap imports, our local producers will not stand a chance. We need to stand with our countrymen. And yes, I am aware that I cannot speak for every agricultural industry. I know soybeans (among others) are indeed affected by large "corporate" farming practices and that certain products do need migrant laborers. But there are MANY others that aren't affected by those issues and that are DEFINITELY hurting for other reasons.
Saffron3
February 3, 2017
I appreciate your response. I went and read some small amount on sugar cane in Louisiana; second largest business in the state it said. I certainly have no ideas new to the very difficult business of small farms; I have had a few such folks as family friends, most in years past, but hard hard work each day.
And in Maine, again living by the sea, folks work hard days, everyone trying to provide for families and towns. We as a country do need to find ways to help the small land owners survive and prosper. The alternative would be imported foods from countries without any regulations. But, don't we also have to export corn, soy, wheat, etc? Seems to me that exports belong to big agro, and more local farmer markets should be greatly expanded for medium range food businesses. Then we learn to eat seasonally. Teach folks food skills, and well, how do we keep all that freedom of choice when we cannot import products and pickers.
I'd love to learn more, and talk more. There is a middle road for food growth etc. So many facets for a large country. Take care.
And in Maine, again living by the sea, folks work hard days, everyone trying to provide for families and towns. We as a country do need to find ways to help the small land owners survive and prosper. The alternative would be imported foods from countries without any regulations. But, don't we also have to export corn, soy, wheat, etc? Seems to me that exports belong to big agro, and more local farmer markets should be greatly expanded for medium range food businesses. Then we learn to eat seasonally. Teach folks food skills, and well, how do we keep all that freedom of choice when we cannot import products and pickers.
I'd love to learn more, and talk more. There is a middle road for food growth etc. So many facets for a large country. Take care.
Alan S.
February 2, 2017
I'm tired to death of politics, mostly because no one discusses them, they scream, yell, and throw tantrums. This applies to both sides of the aisle. Calm is dead in this country, quite possibly this world. I say a pox on all politicians. Now lets cook.
SarahInMinneapolis
February 2, 2017
Thank you so much, Amanda and Merrill, for writing this post which I hope sets the tone for Food 52. Agreed: "food is inescapably political, inescapably part of a wider world."
Or as "Throwcly," who runs a 4H Club in KY wrote in the comments below, "Politics are unavoidable, but having a safe starting point is fundamental."
"A safe starting point" is brilliant. What's not safe? Again, pulling from the comments below, your managing editor Kenzi Wilbur, writing that Food52 editors thought about referencing the "Muslim ban" in a post about Iraqi funnel cakes. That's not "safe," because there is no Muslim ban. 85 percent of the Muslims in the world are not affected by the ban of people from seven countries. A list Obama created, not Trump.
In my view, greatly hindering your ability to create safe starting points is that your writers and editors suffer from "Brooklyn Bubble" Syndrome. [For those who don't know what I'm talking about, the Brooklyn Bubble is a sketch on Saturday Night Live in which narrow-minded people in Brooklyn live isolated from any facts or opinions that disrupt their world view.]
Two other points. One, thank you for allowing unedited comments from readers. I do think it really helps people "understand" the other side's thinking -- or lack thereof.
Two. Much of the "divisiveness" in our country right now is caused by a certain segment of people who refuse to accept the results of the election. Trump was legitimately elected under our Electoral College procedure in our Constitution. [Others can rant about the popular vote, but that's not the system we have.] And, as Obama -- rightly -- said, "Elections have consequences."
In sum, if I ran Food 52, I'd put two phrases in big bold letters on the chalkboard in the conference room: "Safe Starting Point" and "Brooklyn Bubble."
On a lighter note and for those who have been following this discussion, I think I'll make a big vat of Pimento Cheese this weekend. But I won't be using Cabot Cheese from VT; I'll opt for the more locally-sourced and truly tasty two-year aged cheddar from Widmer's in WI.
In sum, if I ran Food 52, I'd put two phrases in big bold letters on the chalkboard in the conference room: "Safe Starting Point" and "Brooklyn Bubble."
On a lighter note and for those who have been following this discussion, I think I'll make a big vat of Pimento Cheese this weekend. But I won't be using Cabot Cheese from VT; I'll opt for the more locally-sourced and truly tasty two-year aged cheddar from Widmer's in WI.
Or as "Throwcly," who runs a 4H Club in KY wrote in the comments below, "Politics are unavoidable, but having a safe starting point is fundamental."
"A safe starting point" is brilliant. What's not safe? Again, pulling from the comments below, your managing editor Kenzi Wilbur, writing that Food52 editors thought about referencing the "Muslim ban" in a post about Iraqi funnel cakes. That's not "safe," because there is no Muslim ban. 85 percent of the Muslims in the world are not affected by the ban of people from seven countries. A list Obama created, not Trump.
In my view, greatly hindering your ability to create safe starting points is that your writers and editors suffer from "Brooklyn Bubble" Syndrome. [For those who don't know what I'm talking about, the Brooklyn Bubble is a sketch on Saturday Night Live in which narrow-minded people in Brooklyn live isolated from any facts or opinions that disrupt their world view.]
Two other points. One, thank you for allowing unedited comments from readers. I do think it really helps people "understand" the other side's thinking -- or lack thereof.
Two. Much of the "divisiveness" in our country right now is caused by a certain segment of people who refuse to accept the results of the election. Trump was legitimately elected under our Electoral College procedure in our Constitution. [Others can rant about the popular vote, but that's not the system we have.] And, as Obama -- rightly -- said, "Elections have consequences."
In sum, if I ran Food 52, I'd put two phrases in big bold letters on the chalkboard in the conference room: "Safe Starting Point" and "Brooklyn Bubble."
On a lighter note and for those who have been following this discussion, I think I'll make a big vat of Pimento Cheese this weekend. But I won't be using Cabot Cheese from VT; I'll opt for the more locally-sourced and truly tasty two-year aged cheddar from Widmer's in WI.
In sum, if I ran Food 52, I'd put two phrases in big bold letters on the chalkboard in the conference room: "Safe Starting Point" and "Brooklyn Bubble."
On a lighter note and for those who have been following this discussion, I think I'll make a big vat of Pimento Cheese this weekend. But I won't be using Cabot Cheese from VT; I'll opt for the more locally-sourced and truly tasty two-year aged cheddar from Widmer's in WI.
SarahInMinneapolis
February 2, 2017
Sorry the post is a mess at the end. Got screwed up in my cutting and pasting. Can anyone delete thos last two repetitive grafs? Thanks.
Bevi
February 2, 2017
I cannot detect anything in your post above, SiM, that offers a safe starting point for discussion. And as a granddaughter of one of the founding members of the Cabot Cooperative Creamery, I am happy to see you buy your cheese elsewhere.
SarahInMinneapolis
February 2, 2017
I was not offering a safe starting point. I am commenter with an opinion.
I am betting most farmers currently in the Cabot Coop don't care about the politics of their buyers -- as long as they stay buyers. If I'm wrong, Cabot goes on the same list as Penzey's.
I am betting most farmers currently in the Cabot Coop don't care about the politics of their buyers -- as long as they stay buyers. If I'm wrong, Cabot goes on the same list as Penzey's.
Betsey
February 2, 2017
I wish you would change your handle. You are giving the Food52 readers an impression of Minneapolis as a non-welcoming, bigoted and frankly rude place. Maybe you should actually move to Wisconsin? Your politics and attitude seem to match that state much better. Minneapolis and Minnesota will continue to remain a safe and welcoming place for refugees and immigrants from all over.
Panfusine
February 2, 2017
SarahinMinneapolis, - from your profile, it appears like you've contributed ZILCH/zero to this collective site that many of us Americans from around the world rally around with pride. That definitely puts you in the category of an entitled 'taker' ( even Freeloader perhaps). Thank you for giving us a glimpse into what 'your' political bubble clearly is.
SarahInMinneapolis
February 2, 2017
Now we're at the oh-so-predictable stage where you shoot the messenger instead of responding to the merits of the message. So far: "Bigoted," "non-welcoming," "rude," "taker," "freeloader." Nonsensical name-calling.
Alex W.
February 2, 2017
SarahInMinneapolis,
1. Seems like you like to snoop around a bit and then pass judgement on the editors of Food52. I wonder what you think you know about ME based on what you read on the internet. I wonder if you can determine anything about my childhood, my parents, my family, and my experiences. And then based on what you think you know about me, do you think it's okay for you to tell me what I'm allowed to think about, how I should spend my free time, or what I should do for work? This isn't a rhetorical exercise—I would actually like for you to tell me what you think you know about me and what "bubble" I fit into based on your thorough online research.
2. It seems based on your comment that you don't think Food52 is a "safe space" for you to express yourself. I've seen quite a few comments in this thread that offer insightful ideas about how to cover politics and food. It seems like there are many people of differing opinions and backgrounds on F52 and they feel safe enough to share their thoughts without personally attacking and discounting the words of others. To me, you are the only one making this space unsafe and that's a shame. Please grow up and join the conversation in a constructive way.
3. Finally—and this is a response to a political statement that you made so anyone not looking for politics should stop reading now—but if you really believe that people are protesting the results of the election then perhaps you are much worse at internet research than I previously thought. People are not protesting the outcome of the election for President; they are protesting the actions of our elected President. And after seeing the alarming and xenophobic actions of our President, the question shouldn't be, "why are we concerned," but, "why aren't you?”
Best regards,
Alex
1. Seems like you like to snoop around a bit and then pass judgement on the editors of Food52. I wonder what you think you know about ME based on what you read on the internet. I wonder if you can determine anything about my childhood, my parents, my family, and my experiences. And then based on what you think you know about me, do you think it's okay for you to tell me what I'm allowed to think about, how I should spend my free time, or what I should do for work? This isn't a rhetorical exercise—I would actually like for you to tell me what you think you know about me and what "bubble" I fit into based on your thorough online research.
2. It seems based on your comment that you don't think Food52 is a "safe space" for you to express yourself. I've seen quite a few comments in this thread that offer insightful ideas about how to cover politics and food. It seems like there are many people of differing opinions and backgrounds on F52 and they feel safe enough to share their thoughts without personally attacking and discounting the words of others. To me, you are the only one making this space unsafe and that's a shame. Please grow up and join the conversation in a constructive way.
3. Finally—and this is a response to a political statement that you made so anyone not looking for politics should stop reading now—but if you really believe that people are protesting the results of the election then perhaps you are much worse at internet research than I previously thought. People are not protesting the outcome of the election for President; they are protesting the actions of our elected President. And after seeing the alarming and xenophobic actions of our President, the question shouldn't be, "why are we concerned," but, "why aren't you?”
Best regards,
Alex
Jeffrey B.
February 2, 2017
1. All political comment results in judgement. Like the “20% tax on imported avocados” avocados is a heart health oil but we should eat regional seasonal. Which view is best? Now we have a judgement to make.
2. You are judging this person by saying “you are the only one”. So is it not a “shame” that you are judging others?
3. Finally by attracting Trump you have just for lack of a better word attached the 50% of Americans which voted for Trump based on the idea that he would follow through with his campaign promises. Also not this is a web page directed at the “Americas” so do politics of England matter to the readers. And one must ask does “Best regards” mean you English for it is much more common ending from and Englishmen then an American. So should English accept negative comments about the English Leaders? Let’s keep all polices comments out of food or the food will be lost .
2. You are judging this person by saying “you are the only one”. So is it not a “shame” that you are judging others?
3. Finally by attracting Trump you have just for lack of a better word attached the 50% of Americans which voted for Trump based on the idea that he would follow through with his campaign promises. Also not this is a web page directed at the “Americas” so do politics of England matter to the readers. And one must ask does “Best regards” mean you English for it is much more common ending from and Englishmen then an American. So should English accept negative comments about the English Leaders? Let’s keep all polices comments out of food or the food will be lost .
Mike S.
February 2, 2017
Amen, Alex!
I love that SarahInMinneapolis is just following the typical Trump supporter trope of calling people who don't agree with her ignorant or that they live in a bubble. You've already outed yourself as a bigot, and indeed you have given a bad name to Minneapolis. You live in a sad bubble, Sarah, that is indeed filled with racists and bigots. Your idea of a Brooklyn bubble is from SNL? Good thing you're watching that show. I wonder how many people of color, Muslims, immigrants you know. You probably don't. Your accusation of liberal bubbles is so old and tired that it's just funny. YOU live in a bubble of white racism and privilege.
It is also obvious that you just came on here to pick a fight and then quickly discovered you didn't have the knowledge to back it up. In reality, as on this thread, you are outnumbered by good people who are open to each other, to experiences, and to the world.
I love that SarahInMinneapolis is just following the typical Trump supporter trope of calling people who don't agree with her ignorant or that they live in a bubble. You've already outed yourself as a bigot, and indeed you have given a bad name to Minneapolis. You live in a sad bubble, Sarah, that is indeed filled with racists and bigots. Your idea of a Brooklyn bubble is from SNL? Good thing you're watching that show. I wonder how many people of color, Muslims, immigrants you know. You probably don't. Your accusation of liberal bubbles is so old and tired that it's just funny. YOU live in a bubble of white racism and privilege.
It is also obvious that you just came on here to pick a fight and then quickly discovered you didn't have the knowledge to back it up. In reality, as on this thread, you are outnumbered by good people who are open to each other, to experiences, and to the world.
Jeffrey B.
February 2, 2017
Michael you are yet another example of why politics should not be on this site. It turns to name calling and endless arguing. Next someone will pull up the fact that 95% of all terrorist attack are done in the name of Islam and anther will rightly say you cannot judge a person on their color or faith. ETC. ETC. ETC.
SarahInMinneapolis
February 2, 2017
Michael.Sidman.5: Are you a writer for The Onion parodying The Left?
Mike S.
February 2, 2017
Huh?
I think we're all still waiting to see if you have anything of substance to say. You've been asked a whole bunch of questions to see why you would spew the things you say, but instead you turn to juvenile tactics to avoid it. So either say something of substance, or leave.
I think we're all still waiting to see if you have anything of substance to say. You've been asked a whole bunch of questions to see why you would spew the things you say, but instead you turn to juvenile tactics to avoid it. So either say something of substance, or leave.
Doris
February 2, 2017
What ever we think of the current administration, we all need to eat. Nowadays when we go to the grocery store whether it is a fancy high-end shop where people are concerned about exactLy what is in that product, or we are at the food pantry trying to feed the family for a week, food and the production of it does have a political aspect.
Marale G.
February 2, 2017
Politics is all around us. It is history. I live in Washington, DC and have a huge dose of it on a daily basis, so much now that my mind simply wants to take a break and think about other things. Let us celebrate food, its roots and how it brings us together. I was forced to leave my country twice but food was always a constant. No matter where I was, food brought us closer together. It was about old friends, meeting new people, and loved ones coming together to talk, laugh, cry, and eat. In celebrating, let us focus less on the media and the 'she said' 'he said' and remember those suffering in the meantime. Refugees from war torn countries, people who have lost their homes, relatives and loved ones, and those who find themselves not able to return home and be reunited with the people they love. We are fortunate and can voice our opinions. Many others sit in silence.
healthierkitchen
February 6, 2017
Marale - we all would probably like a break, but what's so sad is when sharing stories like yours and other who have been forced to leave their countries seems political to some people. I wish that wasn't so, and wish it to be true that we can all come together around food. But we're learning that not everyone in this country (or even in this community) actually believes in a diverse and free America and not everyone welcomes refugees here. To the extent that this site is helping to share stories of food from around the world and from different cultures within our country in hopes of bringing people together, I for one would not like food52 to pander to the few who find that unpalateable. We are a proud country of immigrants and migrants and refugees. For anyone who feels that is political, my vote would be for that person to quietly log off. They have that right.
ViennaResident
February 2, 2017
So very disappointing to tune in this morning and read the overtly political statements having nothing to do with food. This was a nice conversation, the short while it lasted; now it is just another outside-the-scope topic to add to my "unfollow" list. :(
Saffron3
February 2, 2017
I find food calming, to cook, to give to others, to eat. I think when I eat, I know others who pick, and some who wolf it down. I have enough to eat, others have too much, and too many are hungry. I'm a political beast, I don't understand being conservative. I'm like ChefJune; been around the voting booth. I like to read opinions, I like an atmosphere where we can disagree, but maybe talk about soup together, so I join in thanking you for being extant in the web of life.
Susanna O.
February 1, 2017
I wanted to respond to the email after Election Day. It made me cry. I think that you are totally correct that food, if you are thoughtful about it, is completely political. Second, I think it is absolutely your right to just say "This is our corner of the internet; we get to say what happens here." At any rate, BRAVA! on both counts. Keep up the righteous fight.
duckfat
February 1, 2017
Cooking is not a robotic act even though some procedures might seem that way. Stirring risotto, slowly caramelizing onions, etc. At those times the mind becomes engaged in thoughts not related to the task at hand. Since 11/08 my thoughts constantly turn to the debacle we saw coming and now are living with. Yes, it's political and the planet's future is at stake. That isn't hyperbole. Just look at trumps statement today, alone, and it's only 2 weeks into his administration. Thank you for having the intellectual guts to broach this subject. Most of us (according to popularity ratings of Trump) share 4 cups of inner turmoil mixed with equal amounts of anxiety, shame for our leaders' betrayal of what makes America great....it's one of those recipes each cook can add or subtract to.
MoreFoodPlease
February 1, 2017
Still, I think you ought to run a contest for best recipes our families brought with them from the "old country." Just to demonstrate the degree to which what we eat every day is shaped by the traditions and flavors we share with the homes of our ancestors.
Annie S.
February 1, 2017
Food has been political since biblical times. Salt is one of the most political food component. Then came spices and tea; nutmeg coveted like a jewel. Slaves taken from their homes and forced to pick tea. We may argue about fossil fuel but that really doesn't affect the entire world. Food touches everyone.
I was on a guest worker visa in South Asia and traveled around quite a bit for three years. It was impossible for me to share language with all of the people I met. I made it a point to understand the most basic of their foods. I have eaten more forms of bread that I ever knew existed; but showing respect and knowledge of their daily life led these people to call me "chechi", sister.
I had never been out of the US before those experiences. Honoring them by respecting their food traditions taught me about universal kinship.
I was on a guest worker visa in South Asia and traveled around quite a bit for three years. It was impossible for me to share language with all of the people I met. I made it a point to understand the most basic of their foods. I have eaten more forms of bread that I ever knew existed; but showing respect and knowledge of their daily life led these people to call me "chechi", sister.
I had never been out of the US before those experiences. Honoring them by respecting their food traditions taught me about universal kinship.
PHIL
February 1, 2017
This country has always had division, It is an unfortunate byproduct of our diversity but a small price to pay for the benefits of diversity. Keep doing what you are doing , your success is proof that you are on the right track. Food brings us together so we can argue at the dinner table. Have a meal with someone you disagree with ,it may be more enjoyable than you might think.
creamtea
February 1, 2017
True! Early on my parents were on opposite ends of the political spectrum. Each found the other's point of view on various topics to be "food for thought." Although they aligned later on, they always hosted friends with starkly opposing views and there were plenty of heated discussions (as there are now at my table with my guests). At the end of Thanksgiving (or any other shared meal) they all "shook hands" metaphorically speaking, grinned, and said "till next time!"
mrslarkin
February 1, 2017
Thank you! I look forward to hearing from food52 and all of its users on food topics that are relevant to my daily life.
Weird, I feel a sudden urge to eat loads of Cabot Pimento Cheese...
Weird, I feel a sudden urge to eat loads of Cabot Pimento Cheese...
Connor B.
February 1, 2017
As someone who ate approximately 5 out of the 12 pimento cheeseballs we made in the office, I promise you they're delicious.
Panfusine
February 1, 2017
I'm polishing of slices of Cabots Pepper Jack cheese (its an omnipresent staple at home)
TinaSMay
February 1, 2017
Very upsetting that Amanda chooses to be any part of the Trump administration.
freshparsley
February 1, 2017
The White House Fellows were founded during LBJ's term and I hope they will continue flourish as they provide opportunities for individuals not currently serving in federal government to learn first hand how things work. And the cabinet secretary who are lucky enough to get a fellow, gets a fresh perspective to add to the important work they are doing. I hope that by transitioning from the Obama team to the Trump team, Amanda will bring her important views to a new audience and thereby do good for hard-working federal workers, a new class of fellows and Americans. Thanks!
Kayleigh
February 1, 2017
The best way to create change is from the inside. If everyone who had opposing views jumped ship when power changed hands, any administration would end up just being an echo chamber and could bulldoze everything and everyone in their path. I'm glad Amanda has chosen to transition over to the Trump administration. She can be a positive influence.
Brandon
February 1, 2017
I follow some technical blogs that often have a separate discussion area for political talk. The posts will have some notice that says something like, "Due to the political nature of this post, please take your political comments over here:" I think it is a good balance. You are free to participate or not in the discussion and at the same time if you only are interested in the more specific topic of the blog, you can choose to stay out of the political threads.
Cami G.
February 1, 2017
I DO support a tax on mexican avocados! We should be eating/ buying US produce. The US grows avocados- a lot of them. Both Florida and California. A large issue with the "healthfulness" of the foods that we as Americans currently eat is that so much of it is grown in countries that have far less stringent control over their "product." We should all eat "local" and seasonal.
ChefJune
February 1, 2017
More Mexican avocadoes have been imported of late because there has been a SHORTAGE of Hass avocadoes here in US. For those of us who really love avocadoes, this has been a blessing. As well, much Mexican produce is grown more sustainably than our factory-farmed produce.
sydney
February 1, 2017
The political world is polarized everywhere at the moment (I'm not American), which is dangerous. But I'm an independent in every way, and unthinking partisanship repels me. This line (among much Food52 writing lately) is the cue: "...if international cuisines are being misrepresented or misappropriated...". Yuk! Behind it sits the unthinking dogma of SJW identity politics. X cuisine must be done this way; Y cuisine that way. That's identity politics groupthink in food.
No, I like the fact that the Japanese incorporated Western mayo and cake weirdly into their food, and that Chinese food does interesting things with yeast bread and they're moving into fine wine; and that Western cuisine is a mishmash of lots of things. That's the real world, just like how language changes through its use. I recently read a tweet how people must stop using cumin culturally improperly. Really? Hello, Soviet Gulag gruel! Hello, Chairman Mao's re-education camp cafeteria!
As I said previously in a comment about identity politics in food, I prefer my bitterness in rapini and my whine without the H. The regressive-left is all about resentment.
I would have given Food52's new foray into politics more room if it had ever written about plastics in food, or the politics of organics, or the politics of corporate farming, or GMOs, or the dangers of silicone, or the role of processed food in the explosion of autoimmunity. But no: it's just a regressive-left reaction to your election. Fairweather politicization. Sad, and a disservice to readers.
Bye-bye, Food52, it's been great. Have fun on the regressive-left. I've been there and done that.
Hello, Serious Eats http://www.seriouseats.com/. I look forward to your recipes and writers, whatever their cultures and cuisines. But don't tell me how I'm supposed to eat and think about food; I'll decide that, thanks.
No, I like the fact that the Japanese incorporated Western mayo and cake weirdly into their food, and that Chinese food does interesting things with yeast bread and they're moving into fine wine; and that Western cuisine is a mishmash of lots of things. That's the real world, just like how language changes through its use. I recently read a tweet how people must stop using cumin culturally improperly. Really? Hello, Soviet Gulag gruel! Hello, Chairman Mao's re-education camp cafeteria!
As I said previously in a comment about identity politics in food, I prefer my bitterness in rapini and my whine without the H. The regressive-left is all about resentment.
I would have given Food52's new foray into politics more room if it had ever written about plastics in food, or the politics of organics, or the politics of corporate farming, or GMOs, or the dangers of silicone, or the role of processed food in the explosion of autoimmunity. But no: it's just a regressive-left reaction to your election. Fairweather politicization. Sad, and a disservice to readers.
Bye-bye, Food52, it's been great. Have fun on the regressive-left. I've been there and done that.
Hello, Serious Eats http://www.seriouseats.com/. I look forward to your recipes and writers, whatever their cultures and cuisines. But don't tell me how I'm supposed to eat and think about food; I'll decide that, thanks.
Mike S.
February 1, 2017
Then you're not an independent. And to all your other false claims, you apparently didn't read the above note:
"We’ve covered the Farm Bill, G.M.O. labeling, food access, and the environment. Amanda wrote an Op-Ed in the New York Times that critiqued Michelle Obama’s stance on cooking. "
Goodbye to you both!
"We’ve covered the Farm Bill, G.M.O. labeling, food access, and the environment. Amanda wrote an Op-Ed in the New York Times that critiqued Michelle Obama’s stance on cooking. "
Goodbye to you both!
Nancy
February 1, 2017
Sydney - Amen.
P.S. Not to mention the amalgan of French/Vietnamese cooking, most American restaurant cooking calling itself Chinese or Italian or Indian (all of which serve/served restricted, adapted and invented dishes), cooking of south Asian migrants in east & central Africa, Chinese/Malaysian amalgam, etc etc.
P.S. Not to mention the amalgan of French/Vietnamese cooking, most American restaurant cooking calling itself Chinese or Italian or Indian (all of which serve/served restricted, adapted and invented dishes), cooking of south Asian migrants in east & central Africa, Chinese/Malaysian amalgam, etc etc.
Liane
February 1, 2017
Enough, Michael!!! This is not about political affiliations. I'm sorry but you come across as such an angry and bitter person. I don't read ALL the articles on Food52 but I do enjoy the site very much, it was just the one article that I didn't feel was necessary at that particular time. Let's shake hands and move on. I wish nothing but the best for you. :)
E
February 1, 2017
Sidney, sorry to tell you that if you read the articles over at Serious Eats, there's political commentary leaning towards the left as well :)
Sheila D.
February 1, 2017
Facts tend to have a liberal bias. That is just life, which has been progressing.
Alan
February 1, 2017
Nancy, it's more than a bit ironic that you mention French/Vietnamese, "invented" and "adapted" Chinese, Italian, and Indian dishes, Asian food in Africa, and Chinese/Malaysian food while supporting an anti-political stance. Are you not aware that every single one of those culinary mashups you mention exists purely because of politics?
PHIL
February 1, 2017
fact
fakt/Submit
noun
a thing that is indisputably the case.
by definition a fact cannot have a liberal or conservative bias,
fakt/Submit
noun
a thing that is indisputably the case.
by definition a fact cannot have a liberal or conservative bias,
Nancy
February 1, 2017
Alan, must be confusing me with someone else. Not anti-politics. Yes, in favor of getting on with life.
amber
February 1, 2017
Good luck reading Serious Eats, sydney. Do you realize that Kenji's twitter bio describes him as a feminist, atheist, and "unapologetically progressive?" He's got plenty of tweets like these-- https://twitter.com/TheFoodLab/status/825819023325552640 https://twitter.com/TheFoodLab/status/825568060002103297 And when people tell him to stay out of politics, he says, "I think human decency and civil rights should transcend politics."
Keep on doing good work, Food52. Thanks for the coverage.
Keep on doing good work, Food52. Thanks for the coverage.
Saffron3
February 2, 2017
If facts have a liberal bias, does that mean fiction has a conservative bias? Do I need to eat more donuts?
Moshee
February 1, 2017
I have to admit to being drawn away from my fun Food52 reading to more serious subjects since the results of the election, but I'm proud that you all didn't ignore this and instead are discussing it. Brava & how brave of you! I would expect nothing less, as I have been an avid reader and fan of Amanda's since I can remember. Happy to hear that you're staying on at the WH. Thanks for your tolerance and for hosting this place for us to fight it out - civilly of course. :)
Mike S.
February 1, 2017
It's wonderful that Food52 did what it does best -- using food to open our eyes to people, places and cultures. If some people are offended by food from Arab cultures, then it is their problem. The rest of us will continue to support this incredible website.
Liane
February 1, 2017
I agree, Food52 is wonderful. I just feel there is a big difference between cultures and politics. Why would you even say anything about being offended by food from Arab cultures??? That has absolutely nothing to do with anything, so don't go there. You know nothing about me or my culture, where I come from or where I've been.
Mike S.
February 1, 2017
Well you're the one who seems so shocked by all of this. Asking people to come together around food is a beautiful statement for a time when most Americans are terrified for their futures and for the futures of the people around them. If that is an upsetting fact, then so be it.
Sheila D.
February 1, 2017
Well said, Michael. When we celebrate each other's food, especially with stories about the origins and the culture we learn to appreciate each other. We cannot separate a certain amount of politics when it will affect our ability to share our cultures with other cultures.
Liane
February 1, 2017
I guess I'm alone in that I felt uncomfortable as soon as politics were mentioned only after Election Day. Luckily I can choose what to read here.
charmor
February 1, 2017
As noted above, food policy was covered well before the election. The fact that you only perceive these topics as negatively "political" after election day is perhaps motivated by something other than the coverage itself.
charmor
February 1, 2017
This is true. I can only respond to what you write. And what you wrote is "politics were mentioned only after Election Day." I don't think it is unreasonable to assume that you only perceived Food 52 as discussing "politics" only after Election Day based on this.
Then again, I've recently been told by so-called public figures not to judge one's beliefs or intentions by what they say, so maybe it was unreasonable to read in any meaning.
Then again, I've recently been told by so-called public figures not to judge one's beliefs or intentions by what they say, so maybe it was unreasonable to read in any meaning.
Liane
February 1, 2017
Never assume anything about anyone. Let's just eat, drink, and be merry for now!
charmor
February 1, 2017
Right on. Per your instructions, I will assume there is no meaning attached to the words you write here!
Nancy
February 1, 2017
Yes, food is political.
But/and I wonder about possible selective timing.
You posted a note worrying about divisiveness the day after the Nov 2016 election.
Did you post a similar note and evince similar concern the day after the Nov 2012 election?
On the other hand, isn't representative democracy about carrying on, first with the government that was elected, and second, if your favorite candidate or party lost, figuring out how to come back and win next time?
But/and I wonder about possible selective timing.
You posted a note worrying about divisiveness the day after the Nov 2016 election.
Did you post a similar note and evince similar concern the day after the Nov 2012 election?
On the other hand, isn't representative democracy about carrying on, first with the government that was elected, and second, if your favorite candidate or party lost, figuring out how to come back and win next time?
Erin
February 1, 2017
It's interesting - and I honestly mean that in a positive way - the different ways people take communication, especially written. My interpretation of the "divisiveness" word-choice was that the citizens of this country, and the world at large, seem more divided now than in the past. This election cycle has highlighted that divide more than any other in recent memory. There are people on both sides and in the middle feeling abandoned, ignored and misunderstood. I read the post after the election and felt it was in large part a request to those people who feel their views are being overlooked to contact Food52 directly so that they can do their part to better bring us all together. A major talking point throughout the election (and in recent days) has been the failure of the media to accurately report on the news of the day. Given that, I would hope more members of the media would do the same and ask how they can improve in reporting/representing many viewpoints, in as constructive a dialogue as possible. The more we all communicate with one another, the better.
And I can understand why you and others may have bristled at the idea that the day after this election was treated differently as the day after the election in 2012.
And I can understand why you and others may have bristled at the idea that the day after this election was treated differently as the day after the election in 2012.
ChefJune
February 1, 2017
Nancy, iirc, there was no candidate in the 2012 election fomenting hate as there was this past November. I'm very sure I'm old enough to be at least your mother and I can tell you for sure there has never been an election in my lifetime as divisive as this past one (I first voted in 1964.)
Alan
February 1, 2017
Nancy, after 8 years of "not my President" and willful obstruction of the last President, you'll have to excuse me if calls from the new President's supporters to unite and give him a chance ring a little hollow. Obama won both the popular vote and the electoral college by larger margins than Trump did -- and he did it twice -- and was never given the respect that Republicans claimed were due the office under Bush and are now claiming again under Trump. So in short, no, I refuse to respect any government I didn't vote for until your side does the same. I tried the high road for two decades and it didn't work. I'm finished.
Yes, I'm making assumptions about your political views and about which side you support, but I'm doing so based on your own statements. If you disagree, let's just call my representation of you an alternative fact. We'll all be dealing with a lot of those over the next four years, so we may as well start getting used to it.
Yes, I'm making assumptions about your political views and about which side you support, but I'm doing so based on your own statements. If you disagree, let's just call my representation of you an alternative fact. We'll all be dealing with a lot of those over the next four years, so we may as well start getting used to it.
throwcly
February 1, 2017
I lead a county level 4-H club for teens in Kentucky. It is a fantastic gathering and it is as much about letting them talk as it is about experiencing new foods and combinations. Politics are unavoidable, but having a safe starting point is fundamental. Taking them on a journey to understand why a culture uses a different method or spice mix or utensil to cook something they also eat- priceless. And prepares them for harder questions. I think your note with all the cookbooks from the regions under so much scrutiny is exactly the type of thing I need access to for my group. Thank You.
Gina
February 1, 2017
Thank you, thank you! Food is the great crossroads, the nexus of politics, ecology, art, culture, everything essentially human. You guys do a great job of bringing up political topics and keeping the discussion thoughtful and even-keeled.
Sheri N.
February 1, 2017
Thank you for this. I used to hide from politics. Many of us did. And look where that got us. Please continue to put forward information that affects us as a food community. I am very awake now. I need to know what I need to know - and you guys are a big part of that. Keep it up! Thanks!
SweetArlene
February 1, 2017
Well said. I'm proud to subscribe to Food52 and thank you for opening our world to include foods from other countries. Keep up the good work!
amysarah
February 1, 2017
Sadly, the term "political" (whether strictly or loosely applied) has taken on an unfortunate connotation, easily used to shut down discussion. I'd doubt many here would say food and cooking aren’t aspects of culture, or that food availability/cost, food insecurity, food-related health or environmental concerns, etc. only exist as topics in a ‘political’ context. But once that label is applied, an allergic reaction ensues. I find this frustrating and confounding – these subjects aren’t apart from my cooking/dining life, they’re baked into it (literally and figuratively.)
Of course that doesn’t mean they're mandatory topics around the dinner table. That’s just silly reductionism. (At meals with my friends and family, when those topics come up, as they often do, it happens organically.) Similarly, F52 clearly isn't suggesting that every article should have that focus.
With limited time, I don’t read everything here – I gravitate towards topics that interest me, as I’m sure most here do. If these sorts of topics are simply not what you want to read here – skip them and move on. If their very existence here bothers you, there are other good food sites that focus solely on cooking/recipes.
Of course that doesn’t mean they're mandatory topics around the dinner table. That’s just silly reductionism. (At meals with my friends and family, when those topics come up, as they often do, it happens organically.) Similarly, F52 clearly isn't suggesting that every article should have that focus.
With limited time, I don’t read everything here – I gravitate towards topics that interest me, as I’m sure most here do. If these sorts of topics are simply not what you want to read here – skip them and move on. If their very existence here bothers you, there are other good food sites that focus solely on cooking/recipes.
Allison C.
February 1, 2017
Rock on! The world is an interconnected place; let's not ignore that. Thank you for this great website!
Allison
February 1, 2017
Thank you for this. The violent and authoritarian political climate has me wondering (often): how are food and lifestyle blogs to act in the Age of Tr***?" This was clarifying.
Along these lines, I noticed a piece about Iraqi funnel cake posted yesterday (https://food52.com/blog/18955-an-iraqi-funnel-cake-better-than-anything-you-d-get-on-a-boardwalk). It was a lovely piece. However it seemed a bit tone deaf considering it didn't mention the Muslim ban, and that all Iraqis are now banned from this country. I wonder if the omission was intentional or simply not considered.
To be honest, I don't know how it should or should not be incorporated. It's tricky. An idea: denounce the ban, collect all recipes from the countries banned, and then celebrate and embrace each country's rich culture of food.
Along these lines, I noticed a piece about Iraqi funnel cake posted yesterday (https://food52.com/blog/18955-an-iraqi-funnel-cake-better-than-anything-you-d-get-on-a-boardwalk). It was a lovely piece. However it seemed a bit tone deaf considering it didn't mention the Muslim ban, and that all Iraqis are now banned from this country. I wonder if the omission was intentional or simply not considered.
To be honest, I don't know how it should or should not be incorporated. It's tricky. An idea: denounce the ban, collect all recipes from the countries banned, and then celebrate and embrace each country's rich culture of food.
Kenzi W.
February 1, 2017
Hey Allison. Thanks for commenting. We talked about referencing the ban specifically when we were thinking about that article. We decided against it, because we feel like—now more than ever—is a time to raise these sorts of things to the surface simply because they're great and we feel compelled to say so. We don't want to suggest that it's the chief reason we care to write articles like that, because the funnel cake itself is the reason (and, deeper, the idea of learning and teaching about cultures that are not our own). We chose to address the ban specifically here: https://food52.com/blog/18942-to-learn-about-the-foods-of-the-banned-countries-open-these-books, but expect to see much more from us along the lines of the former in the coming months. Hope to see you around!
Bevi
February 1, 2017
The vibrancy of a culture depends on spotlighting it for reasons other than being a so-called breeding ground for terrorism. It's eye opening and important for a culture to be celebrated for its art, architecture, food, customs, family life, etc.
Tom R.
February 1, 2017
This is great. I love your food coverage, recipes and features. And I agree politics is a part of it. But please, no coverage of knitting.
Bevi
February 1, 2017
Thank you. Your posts have been reasonable and informative. For instance, in this upcoming age of deregulation, we will find it increasingly important to seek out sites that will help us sort through issues like food safety, reliability of ingredient sourcing, etc. Deregulation of the food industry is a huge politically driven undoing of checks and balances that have been put in place to protect consumers. You don't need the approbation of the entire readership when your aim is to keep us informed on issues that affect our health and our pocketbooks.
Mark T.
February 1, 2017
See Patton Oswalts post on FB, where yiou went wrong was with an uplifting message, unfortunately there are many people out there whose souls have been crushed into little turds, and any ray of sunshine infuriates their dark hearts so much they respond with venom.
Andrea S.
February 1, 2017
Thanks for talking about these important issues. I love this website, and i find it get's to the heart of my interests, political or otherwise. Bravi!
ChefJune
February 1, 2017
If I had more thumbs, I'd be sending you multiple thumbs up. Keep on keeping on!
Molli B.
February 1, 2017
Should you wish to provide answers as to "why" food prices are predicted to rise---please investigate the "water issues" facing California farmers.
JMarie
February 1, 2017
'Stick to your knitting' is a divisive put down akin to 'shut up and stay in the kitchen.' You are in a unique position to interpret the consequences of political change and this reader is happy to consider what you have to say. Well done!
Kate
February 1, 2017
I've been enjoying Food52 for years but this is the first time I've felt compelled to add my voice to the comments. Thank you for recognizing that food is woven into every part of our lives, including issues of politics, justice, and rights. This perspective is what keeps me coming back to Food52 - keep up the great work!
Barbara S.
February 1, 2017
Keep up the good work, be true to your mission. Food is not an island unto itself. Everything one does in life has political aspects to it, without even realizing it. I prefer to be informed.
ViennaResident
February 1, 2017
There is political, and then there is political. And so far, you guys are the appropriate kind of political, at least for me. As an American living abroad, I especially like to keep up on your interpretations of international cuisine, though I haven't seen much on Austria (where I live). Perhaps a feature on Slovenian cuisine, that of the First Lady, as well?
Kate D.
February 1, 2017
I've been really appreciating your politically-leaning posts! As you said so eloquently, our political history and the history of food are intertwined, which to me just makes cooking and sharing meals all the more powerful and comforting in times like these. I really value how you've addressed issues from a perspective of cultural understanding and empathy, and I hope you continue to do that. Thank you!
Lynn
February 1, 2017
I registered just to tell you that I LOVE your timely focus on the possibility of pricier produce and how immigrant dishes have help shaped America's palate. It's just perfect. Food is personal and political. I appreciate your perspective.
Emily
February 1, 2017
While agree that food is certainly political, I would qualify that statement and add another caveat. Food is political in the sense that food is always influenced by culture, deeply rooted worldviews, economic statuses, race, region and the like. Food is always tied to the people making it, and those people come to the cutting board with a particular way of thinking that influences the way they cook. In this sense you cannot separate food from politics. Food, then, need not necessarily be overtly political nor should it attempt to cut itself off from politics as this is certainly almost impossible. Food cannot stand on its own as some objective thing uninfluenced by mindsets and political perspectives. However, because food is already influenced by the people making it, it need not be overtly political. Food can speak for itself. Let the food be the medium through which the other person comes to know and experience your love of culture, your political stance, your openness to people of other races, your concern for injustice, your love for the poor, your concern for ecology, etc.
Food is probably one of the few things remaining that can bring a polarized country together. I believe food is political, and it has the power to break down barriers and unify people whom otherwise would remain divided. But, sometimes words are not always necessary. Sometimes all that is needed is a common experience of something delicious.
All that I have read of Food52 to this point is evidently open to people of all races and cultures, ecologically mindful, and concerned for the health and well-being of all people.
I think you just keep doing what you've been doing. Don't fix what isn't broken.
Emily
Food is probably one of the few things remaining that can bring a polarized country together. I believe food is political, and it has the power to break down barriers and unify people whom otherwise would remain divided. But, sometimes words are not always necessary. Sometimes all that is needed is a common experience of something delicious.
All that I have read of Food52 to this point is evidently open to people of all races and cultures, ecologically mindful, and concerned for the health and well-being of all people.
I think you just keep doing what you've been doing. Don't fix what isn't broken.
Emily
Alexis A.
February 1, 2017
you go, girls! While I have my own very specific political views, I love getting perspective not just on other view points, but hearing them channeled through the food industry. I think food has a way of "humanizing" politics in that its something everyone can relate to. I don't presume to understand all the political jargon that's used in regular news articles, but food, I get ;-). Keep up the good work!
Marale G.
February 1, 2017
Being a foreigner and soon to be American citizen I do not have a problem either way. I love food and try to learn about different cuisines. I welcome opinions, thoughts, and feelings into my life as we all have a voice. I visit this site regularly and post recipes. People have a choice and yes, they can voice their opinion and if they are not happy about something they can always stop visiting the site.
Panfusine
February 1, 2017
Bravo, well said!
nancy N.
February 1, 2017
Well said in a measured well meaning way. Let's discuss this topic and the world at large and locally.. . Many departments of government, treaties with neighbors, Allies and adversaries are in a stated of flux. This body politic all of it, will greatly influence food, water, amounts delivery et al. This is the perfect forum to discuss this.
MalibuBrooklyn
February 1, 2017
You're doing a great job. The fact that you are smart and well informed is part of the charm of this site! Bravo
Smaug
February 1, 2017
Most of the discussion I've seen has been either speculation on the potential repercussions of government policies or questions about how people choose to participate in political discussions, neither of which is properly speaking politics.
Valine T.
February 1, 2017
You're the Meryl Streep of food site. Thank you for being honest and fearless.
Pescetarianpleasures.com
February 1, 2017
I missed the first post but it only seems natural to be influenced by what is going on in the world. Otherwise these beautiful, mouthwatering recipes don´t reflect the context of reality
charmor
February 1, 2017
Your recent posts are the only reason I've made a point to start visiting this site with regularity. Look forward to continued thoughtful coverage.
healthierkitchen
February 1, 2017
Yes, agreed, food is political. And you all are great for trying to keep it as a connector rather than adding to the divide. Thank you.
Join The Conversation