Popular on Food52
4 Comments
Leslie
July 15, 2016
There is more to this than simply going against nature to produce a seed for food. The main issue is the grossly increased use of pesticides used on GMO crops, the residue being seen in mothers' milk and human urine generations down. These chemicals are known to not only be carcinogenic but to also cause neurological and gastrointestinal issues. Allergies are now suspected. Science is FINALLY started to acknowledge the affect of these pesticides on parkinsons disease and a host of others, Next, consider the impact of our seeds being "owned" by one or two major corporations and the long term benefit to these corporations to our detriment. FRIGHTENING!!!! It is a known fact that Monsanto has paid "shills" who write pro GMO articles and have set up pro GMO websites under very professional, ecologically minded names. It is also a known fact that independent scientists have been questioning the safety of GMO's for years, and Monsanto has spent millions to silence and discredit them. Interesting that the media has been so silent on this, other than to publish biotech sponsored articles when this is something that will have a profound affect on humans and world power.
Sandi A.
July 14, 2016
I don't know if some or all GMOs are safe, but I don't think they have been around long enough for the final determinations to be in. Some probably are, but some may not be. I simply want to know what I'm eating, and when the big food companies try to hide what they are doing, that gets my antennae twitching and my feet ready to dig in in protest. Don't treat me like I'm stupid! I don't trust anybody who treats me like a blithering idiot who hasn't the sense God gave a goose. That also makes me very angry.
Sean R.
July 14, 2016
"Beyond asking yourself whether you believe GMOs are beneficial or harmful...". My attention went straight to "believe". Maybe because that's how we tend to form our opinions. Out of belief. Impressions. Feelings. On this particular topic, perhaps fear?
I think the issues are complex and poorly explained by the media. Either GMOs will cause spontaneous explosions of tumors or they're a bioengineering magnum opus. Most of all, I'd like to know WHY "most developed nations" have restricted the production and sale of GMOs (see the Non-GMO Project propaganda site). Is it an (understandable) abundance of caution? To protect the economy, agriculture, or --truly-- human health?
I will say this, simply: I have no fear of science. Instead, I aim to be skeptical of everyone and everything.
I think the issues are complex and poorly explained by the media. Either GMOs will cause spontaneous explosions of tumors or they're a bioengineering magnum opus. Most of all, I'd like to know WHY "most developed nations" have restricted the production and sale of GMOs (see the Non-GMO Project propaganda site). Is it an (understandable) abundance of caution? To protect the economy, agriculture, or --truly-- human health?
I will say this, simply: I have no fear of science. Instead, I aim to be skeptical of everyone and everything.
marcellatp
July 14, 2016
This sounds like it's going to work like the signs we have in California that say "this store sells products that contain cancer causing chemicals" and you see it as you walk into a huge store like Costco or Target or something. There is no way to know what of the thousands of products the sign could be referring to. It gets ignored and people move on and nothing actually changes. I think that's what companies who pushed for the labels to be like this are hoping for. That the label/qr code will just become more noise that gets ignored.
See what other Food52 readers are saying.