Popular on Food52
5 Comments
Jeremy B.
June 1, 2017
I have to disagree with the hard edge being used to crack an egg and vote in favor of the flat surface method.
Beyond the obvious problem of shoving shell fragments into the egg, the secondary problem with using a hard edge is that if there is any contamination on the outside of the shell it will force that into the interior of the egg and then into your food. Given that the main purpose of an egg shell is to keep contaminates (aka, bacteria) on the outside, pushing the outside into the inside seems like a doubly bad idea.
Beyond the obvious problem of shoving shell fragments into the egg, the secondary problem with using a hard edge is that if there is any contamination on the outside of the shell it will force that into the interior of the egg and then into your food. Given that the main purpose of an egg shell is to keep contaminates (aka, bacteria) on the outside, pushing the outside into the inside seems like a doubly bad idea.
Whiteantlers
April 28, 2017
My mother was a sloppy and dreadful cook and a worse baker. She would smack the long side, not the middle, of eggs against the mixing bowl then just shake the contents of the eggs into the flour mix, guaranteeing lots of shell shards in the finished product. To this day I avoid pound cake.
Smaug
April 28, 2017
It's pretty widely known that cracking an egg against a flat surface leaves you with less eggshell in your food than cracking it against an edge. I'm not so sure why, but it's certainly true.
James
April 28, 2017
Agreed. I've always followed Jacque Pepin's advice, which is to crack against a flat surface so no piece of shell is forced into the crack itself.
ErinM724
July 4, 2017
Huh. I didn't know this. Maybe it will also help me from not getting actual egg on my fingers, which happens EVERY TIME and make it challenging to be cooking an egg on the stove and also have to wash my hands.
See what other Food52 readers are saying.