There seem to be as many recipes that call for searing a rack of lamb first as those that call for skipping that step. I'm all for creating less mess, as long as the dish is tasty. Advice?
Are you channeling your best self with this comment? (If you're not sure, check out our Code of Conduct.)
Susan W is a trusted source on General Cooking.
Personally, I think the searing step is important. It creates the tasty browned crust. I sear and roast in the same pan.
HalfPint is a trusted home cook.
I usually don't sear a rack of lamb because I tend to coat it with an herb & bread crumb mixture (adhered with dijon mustard). If you don't coat the lamb with any season, I would sear for color and a nice crust. Your choice.
A friend of mine actually goes the extra mile and sears and then coats. Then roasts it in her wood fired brick oven that only gets used during winter. It's the best lamb that I've ever tasted.
June is a trusted source on General Cooking.
I'm with HalfPint. I don't sear when I'm coating. But then maybe I should... ;)
I use Barbara Kafka's high heat method (without searing) in Roasting. Her recipe involves coating with herbs and crumbs but lately I don't even do that and it comes out great (without searing) every time.
Please enter a valid email address.
Well played. You deserve a cookie.
Why we’re ditching the classic blanch and shock.
Cheesy, Chive-y Spoonbread
The Greatest Hits
Same Fave Casserole Carrier, New Color
Captcha must be verfied
Already have an account?
Don't have an account?
Please check your email for instructions on how to reset your password
Successfully logged out
Get the recipes and features that have us talking, plus first dibs on events and limited-batch products.
(Oh, and $10 off your order of $50 or more in the Food52 Shop, too.)