Photo by Rocky Luten
On Black & Highly Flavored, co-hosts Derek Kirk and Tamara Celeste shine a light on the need-to-know movers and shakers of our food & beverage industry.
Listen NowPopular on Food52
118 Comments
devinewhobakes
October 15, 2019
Ship to Canada!! I see all there lovely wares but can never order them! Despite that, LOVE your dream site.
Barb S.
October 14, 2019
Please ship to Canada! 🇨🇦 Happy Thanksgiving my fellow Canucks ❤️
Molly M.
October 14, 2019
We have sur la table and William Sonoma. Don’t replicate that ever. I would love a food52 store in houston but will continue to purchase online if needed and only those things unique to you. It’s always awesome to receive something that does not come from either of those 2 stores. I get it tho. Sell to the masses and eat with the kings. As far as recipes -some are a little too time consuming but the internet is flooded with recipes that are quick. I can eat those anywhere anytime.
Silvia S.
October 13, 2019
Don't worry those VC's will tell you what you have to provide in no time flat. Hopefully you can continue to provide excellent content, don't bloat your team, pay ALL your employees, contractors, writers, designers, photographers etc. an equitable salary and remain socially aware and conscious. Apps are a dime a dozen, you've got the funds - go and innovate.
Silvia S.
October 13, 2019
Don't worry those VC's will tell you what you have to provide in no time flat. Hopefully you can continue to provide excellent content, don't bloat your team, pay ALL your employees, contractors, writers, designers, photographers etc. an equitable salary and remain socially aware and conscious. Apps are a dime a dozen, you've got the funds - go and innovate.
bunten
October 11, 2019
I'm instantly less interested. Your $83-million investor will be looking for return on investment above all else, and it's now your obligation to provide it. Good luck with that!
Jane E.
October 11, 2019
It could be interesting to have information available about cooking schools around the world. Best to you and thanks for the quality you bring to our world! XO, JE
Ivy D.
October 11, 2019
I have used this site for the last nine years and really do like it.
Other than the fact that the search engine is not great
But I am a bit dismayed that the drift is to selling things.
Why is bigger better? Well the obvious answer is money.
Oh well-that is the way the world works.
Other than the fact that the search engine is not great
But I am a bit dismayed that the drift is to selling things.
Why is bigger better? Well the obvious answer is money.
Oh well-that is the way the world works.
Genevieve
October 11, 2019
Love reading Food 52, but what I desperately want is that you ship to Canada.
adavis
October 11, 2019
Wonderful! I’m a real Food52 fan. The only thing I ask for is to make it easier to access saved recipes on my iPhone. Somehow my phone is not letting me scroll to the top long enough to tap the icon in the upper right corner.
Adel W.
October 11, 2019
I would love it if you were able to ship internationally... I live in Singapore but I wish I could gain access to the Five Two store!
Sandy B.
October 11, 2019
I am delighted. You are the best recipe source on the internet and when I’m stuck, I write to you. Always helpful and creative. I love your Shop and fear I’ve missed your autumn sale. Somehow I was dropped from your mailing list. Put me back!
Amber
October 10, 2019
I have been a fan of Amanda’s for years, and have rooted for the site since it was announced. I am so pleased that the project has been successful.
Since you asked, I have always thought the site’s strengths were its community (of which I’ve largely been a lurker) and its forward looking POV. The recipes and food discussion always have seemed more progressive than the other big sites — more inclusive of cultures, more willing to engage in food politics. I love the NYT site, but I think they have to inch forward more carefully to avoid alienating their readership. I came to Food52 because I got tired of reading about weeknight chicken recipes elsewhere (unless you’re introducing me to a new technique, in which case I’ll eat my words).
When the store launched, I also loved it. It was a well-curated (sorry for that horrible word) selection of unique, useful and beautiful things. The return policy made me hesitate to buy on occasion, but I’ve tried to support the store whenever I can.
Lately I’ve felt like the site has lost a little focus. Some articles feel like filler, and I seriously doubt Amanda and Merrill would use some of the gimmicky tools from the store in their own kitchens.
You asked what more we want, and honestly, I’m indifferent to what tools you offer (an app, a store, etc. would all be great) as long as it reflects your original editorial voice. I recognize your desire for growth, but if you dilute your brand, then you lose your competitive advantage.
In my day job advising companies and organizations about what their stakeholders want, I often feel like I’m stating the obvious — you have to get the basics right. If the chicken sandwich you are famous for isn’t good, your community outreach program doesn’t matter. I’d like to see you do more, maybe in different ways, of what you already do well and also use these new resources to do the research and soul searching to edit out what isn’t serving the Food52 community. Spend on subtraction just as much as addition.
Since you asked, I have always thought the site’s strengths were its community (of which I’ve largely been a lurker) and its forward looking POV. The recipes and food discussion always have seemed more progressive than the other big sites — more inclusive of cultures, more willing to engage in food politics. I love the NYT site, but I think they have to inch forward more carefully to avoid alienating their readership. I came to Food52 because I got tired of reading about weeknight chicken recipes elsewhere (unless you’re introducing me to a new technique, in which case I’ll eat my words).
When the store launched, I also loved it. It was a well-curated (sorry for that horrible word) selection of unique, useful and beautiful things. The return policy made me hesitate to buy on occasion, but I’ve tried to support the store whenever I can.
Lately I’ve felt like the site has lost a little focus. Some articles feel like filler, and I seriously doubt Amanda and Merrill would use some of the gimmicky tools from the store in their own kitchens.
You asked what more we want, and honestly, I’m indifferent to what tools you offer (an app, a store, etc. would all be great) as long as it reflects your original editorial voice. I recognize your desire for growth, but if you dilute your brand, then you lose your competitive advantage.
In my day job advising companies and organizations about what their stakeholders want, I often feel like I’m stating the obvious — you have to get the basics right. If the chicken sandwich you are famous for isn’t good, your community outreach program doesn’t matter. I’d like to see you do more, maybe in different ways, of what you already do well and also use these new resources to do the research and soul searching to edit out what isn’t serving the Food52 community. Spend on subtraction just as much as addition.
aa1893
October 11, 2019
I wholeheartedly agree with Amber. I feel like Food52 has become heavily weighted towards selling things. I love home design and I've purchased from the store occasionally, but the sales marketing has become so strong that I find myself resenting Food52 emails and the home page. I would like a refocus on cooking and community.
MichiElise
October 14, 2019
Yes to this. Subtract, curate and cultivate the unique and connected voice you’ve had. Really though, I just don’t want to see another click bait headline. Being genuinely about good food was part of what hooked me on F52, no teasers needed.
Butterfingers
October 10, 2019
I read the news, which began like so in the WSJ: "Food52, a digital bazaar that sells upscale home goods, said it sold a majority stake to venture firm TCG for $83 million, a deal that gives TCG an entree into the world of fine dining and home accessories." Funny, I thought; I consider Food 52 to be a community recipe website that also sells things which, while gorgeous, cannot be good for a sustainable Earth. If you're going to continue, I suggest wares that get serious sustainability points, and pave the way toward new attitudes about packaging and manufacturing practices.
Join The Conversation