Wellness
An “Anti-Diet" Dietitian’s Advice for Wellbeing
How to explore intuitive eating and consider weight-neutral approaches to health.
Photo by Rocky Luten
Popular on Food52
17 Comments
Kathleen
February 3, 2021
Thank you to Food52 and Julia for highlighting this. Diet culture and fatphobia have seeped into the food world, and it's incredibly important to have these hard conversations. Intuitive eating allows for pleasure, satisfaction and the enjoyment of food - all while promoting health and helping people heal their relationships with food.
carols
January 29, 2021
Lovely article! Reminded me of the importance of mindful eating and living. Great tips and positive energy. Will be sharing with friends and family! :)
bigtimefoodie12
January 29, 2021
What an amazing and important article. I loved how it highlights how grateful we should be for the support our bodies give us despite the often lack of care today's society gives them. Being kind to ourselves and thinking positively about our relationship with food is always step one in taking care of our bodies and living a healthy lifestyle. Love this so much!
John S.
January 28, 2021
This article is absolute nonsense. Great way to make you LESS healthy.
bigtimefoodie12
January 29, 2021
I think before criticizing this article as nonsense we have to identify our definition of "healthy". When you think of a healthy body, what comes to mind? Is it something that we define? Or is it something that the food/health/diet industries define for us? Health is not universal, it's deeply personal, and each of our methods of reaching what we define as a healthy body (and mind!) will likely be different.
Tory
January 28, 2021
This piece is so incredibly important! Kudos to Julia for bringing this critical topic to Food52!
Smaug
January 27, 2021
I'm not a lawyer, but I doubt that any of this stuff is actionable.
AntoniaJames
January 28, 2021
Hahaha. I *am* a lawyer, and my response was quite similar - wondering how many other people who went to law school (or like you, just know the most common use of that word for many centuries) have the same visceral response I do to the title of that piece. ;o)
barbara C.
January 28, 2021
Lawyer, here. And well, you don’t need to be a lawyer to know that “actionable” also means something practical you can do. Maybe don’t be a tool by meanly trying to deflect from someone’s thoughtful work to support people.
Smaug
January 28, 2021
As a part owner of the English language, I have for some time fought a lonely battle against Food52's assaults on my language. You can of course use language any way you please, and as a lawyer you no doubt do, but my Webster's unabridged, which is as good a reflection of how the language is generally used, allows "action" as a verb only as an archaic usage referring to a legal action and no non legal usages for the word "actionable". While it would be a pleasure to exchange some gratuitous insults with you, it is not in line with Food 52's policies.
AntoniaJames
January 28, 2021
It was not my intention meanly to deflect from this piece, or to be a tool. I'm sorry my comment was taken that way. It's possible, I suppose, that there are some people who might be interested in knowing that for a lot of people, the word "actionable" has a meaning that's quite contrary to what the author intends.
Seeking to understand before seeking to be understood . . . . ;o)
Seeking to understand before seeking to be understood . . . . ;o)
Smaug
January 29, 2021
Actually, I believe that I was the tool in question and proud of it- well, not greatly proud, but as internet postings are largely made without the intervention of editors someone should be watching this stuff. I notice that the author has had the grace to recognize that the word was misused and change the title of the piece.
Rebecca F.
January 29, 2021
Hi Smaug, the headline change was due to an A/B test, but thanks for your feedback!
Smaug
January 29, 2021
My mistake, I have no way of knowing whether the author knew or cared that the word was misused. I don't know what an A/B test might be, but apparently it's used to determine the title of an article two days after it's published, quite a daring concept.
Join The Conversation