Piglet Community Pick: Mast Brothers Chocolate

March  3, 2014

Read up on some of 2013's most-loved cookbooks, tested and reviewed by the one and only Food52 community.

Today: Petitbleu springs for Mast Brothers Chocolate -- and it's a good thing she did.

Shop the Story

I flipped through Mast Brothers Chocolate several times before I decided to buy it. This wasn't from lack of charm, for the book has charm aplenty. Between its sumptuous patterned cover, its subtle, desaturated photography, and recipes that are at once familiar and inventive, this is a cookbook that begs to be flipped through, read, and cooked from.

My reluctance wasn't from lack of familiarity, either. Having nibbled my way through a Mast Brothers chocolate bar or two when I was feeling particularly flush, I know their name is synonymous with excellence. You've never tasted chocolate so sharp, so floral... so wild.

The reason for my hesitation was a bit more prosaic -- $40 is a lot to spend on a cookbook, especially a single-subject charmer like this one. I knew I wanted it, but was it really justifiable? You see, I'm not in the market for coffee table cookbooks or something to sit attractively on my nightstand. While my cookbooks do end up in those two places sometimes, I need them to be most at home where I spend the better part of my days: in the kitchen.

In the end, curiosity got the better of me.

More: You, too? Get a copy of Mast Brothers Chocolate from Provisions.

As I've already mentioned, this book is a beauty to look at and to hold. Its cover mimics the signature wrappers of Mast chocolate bars, printed like a pair of fine silk pajamas. The book has a good weight to it -- not insubstantial, but it still comfortable.

It's also, perhaps more importantly, a great pleasure to read. It's not tiresomely navel-gazing, as are many of the current, nearly autobiographical cookbooks, with scores of pages devoted to memoiresque ramblings and endless photos of people with tattoos. Mast Brothers contains just enough story to keep you enthralled. It's rich with a sense of place -- the brothers' home state of Iowa, a cacao farm in Belize, the Maine coast, a sailboat headed to the Dominican Republic, their factory in Brooklyn. The chapters are divided accordingly. At first, these divisions seem random and disorganized. Those expecting to find recipes grouped according to type will be disappointed. Upon reading the book, however, the structure makes much more sense. It may challenge your ideas of what a cookbook should look like, but you may, as I did, find the narrative approach very much to your liking. Besides, there's always the index to guide your search if you're looking for something specific.

The photos are almost as enticing as the text, and the recipes themselves luxuriate in fields of abundant white space. If Hemingway had delved into recipe writing, it might look something like this. Nearly all the recipes fit neatly onto one page, compressed into sly blocks of un-fussy text with a minimalist style that assumes the reader has some knowledge of cooking.

This, however, is one of the book's few caveats. Those who are comfortable in the kitchen will have great success with these recipes. But a novice will likely be left with a lot of questions, and perhaps even some failures. I do not see this as a strike against the cookbook -- it does not purport to be an instructional text, so there is no unfulfilled promise lurking within. However, it's still worth mentioning that it may not be a good candidate for a fledgling cook.

The first recipe I tested was the Chocolate Chip Cookies, but to say these are not your average chocolate chip cookies is a great understatement. Containing 15 ounces of chopped dark chocolate, they're striated with layer upon layer of chocolate. The inevitable variation in the size of the chocolate chunks means that the tiny chocolate shards melt completely into the dough, while larger chunks create luxurious pockets of gooey chocolate. They were remarkable.

Next came the Chocolate Bread. The loaf came out beautifully -- dark and punctuated with hazelnuts, dark chocolate, and raisins. This bread is excellent served with salted butter or even cheese; I can only imagine how delightful it would be as French toast or in bread pudding. The Chocolate Chip and Ricotta Pancakes were similarly outstanding; nearly perfect, in fact. They were as light as pancakes can get and generously dosed with chocolate. They needed no accompaniment. Maple syrup need not apply.

The Peanut Nib Brittle and Chocolate Granola recipes weren't quite as revelatory, but the brittle attained a nice crunch without corn syrup, and the bitter chocolate hit of the nibs made for a nice contrast to the sugary brittle. The granola lacked salt and crunch, but this is nothing that a couple slight tweaks to the method can't fix.

And herein lies my only complaint about the book. The recipes work and turn out deliciously, but they lack polish in some instances. The stated yield for the chocolate chip cookies was 24 cookies, yet I wound up with 50, using the same "heaping tablespoon" measure indicated in the recipe. I'm not going to complain about having extra cookies around -- I portioned the dough and froze it for later -- and I understand that yields are approximate in most cases. But one test of the recipe should have rectified such a big discrepancy. Similarly, rather than the "1 medium loaf" that the yield specified for the chocolate bread, I wound up with a monster loaf that did not fit in my standard size bread pan -- I could have divided it into two. I knew enough to improvise and turned my loaf into a boule instead, but if I were a novice and hadn't known to check the bread's internal temperature, I might have pulled a thoroughly under-baked loaf out of the oven.

These sorts of small errors may not seem to matter, but as someone who cooks everyday and who values a well-written recipe, they matter to me. I still highly recommend this book -- it is gorgeous, well-written, and the recipes do work if you take them, as you should take all recipes, with a grain of salt.

I can't wait to try the pan-seared Cacao Nib Scallops, the Dark and Stormy Chocolate Cake, and the Orange Nib-Crusted Salmon. This book has already earned a place on my overcrowded shelf, and I look forward to using it for many years to come.


The Piglet—inspired by The Morning News' Tournament of Books—is where the 16 most notable cookbooks of the year face off in a NCAA-style bracketed tournament. Watch the action and weigh in on the results!


See what other Food52 readers are saying.

  • ATG117
  • EmFraiche
  • juleeclip
  • JadeTree
  • jenna_lee
A southern girl with a globetrotting palate, I work alongside my husband John Becker to update and maintain the Joy of Cooking cookbook, website, and app. I love to bake, ferment, and preserve, and I spend an inordinate amount of time perusing farmers markets and daydreaming about chickens and goats.


ATG117 March 3, 2014
Great, well written review, but a bit too generous--it seems. Maybe if I read the book or cooked from it I'd feel differently. My first reaction, though, is that mistakes are not acceptable in cookbooks by professionals, which sell for $40, no less.
petitbleu March 5, 2014
I had the same feeling initially. Easily recognizable mistakes by cookbook authors who seem to otherwise take great pride and care in what they do is really disappointing, and you have to wonder why these sorts of errors make it through to the published book. However, I haven't purchased a cookbook in recent memory that didn't have this kind of error throughout. I've found myself second-guessing every recipe I try, and this has no doubt saved me a great deal of disappointment. I'm not sure why these sorts of errors proliferate--I think it's a "quantity over quality" issue, as everyone and their sister seems to be publishing cookbooks at a fevered pace. Publishers are also struggling to modernize in the face of technological advancement. Many publishers do not even have a food editor (which is important if you're publishing a cookbook--recipe writing requires a wholly different kind of expertise). I don't know what the situation was with Mast Brothers Chocolate. I do know that I was happy enough with the way the recipes turned out that I plan to cook from this book again. But perhaps if you could find this book at your library, it would be best to borrow it and give it a test run before committing. It's worthwhile, but it helps to have some basic cooking knowledge.
EmFraiche March 3, 2014
What a thoughtful review! Thank you for testing so many of the recipes and providing such insightful comments. Sounds like this would indeed be a dangerous one to keep around.
juleeclip March 3, 2014
I bought this book last week, along with the 24 oz. bakers bar of Mast Brothers chocolate, and am relieved to read this. Before buying I read lots of reviews, which slammed this book and contained all lots of complaints failed recipes and missing information. I bought it anyway because I thought it was beautiful and because I couldn't help but wonder if the reviewers were less experienced in the kitchen and, I admit, in some ways I was interested in the challenge. Looking forward to my first attempt (most likely the chocolate chip cookies!) this weekend.
JadeTree March 3, 2014
Love this review! You've showed me that this book has amazing recipes worth making, but that I shouldn't just ignore my kitchen experice when cooking from it. Sometimes it's worth it to just abandon yourself to a new book and let it teach you new things. Sounds like I can give myself some presence here. Since you've given me the caveat, it makes this book much more worth the purchase! Thanks!
jenna_lee March 3, 2014
Oooh, I am a chocolate fiend--- this would be very dangerous book for me to have around. And coincidentally, my fave blogger (Amelia of Bon Appetempt) just whipped up their Chocolate Date Cake which sounds similarly delicious. Thanks for a great review, petitbleu! I love that you tried out so many of the recipes.