I have a question about the recipe "Mashed Potatoes with Caramelized Onions" from Food52. Why does the recipe instruct to leave skin on while boiling potatoes and then peel? Is there an added benefit to this? Seems odd to have to let potatoes cool.
hardlikearmour is a trusted home cook.
If you leave the skin on the potato flesh doesn't get water saturated, so holds up better with the mix-ins.
The only reason to let them cool is to allow you to handle them. If you have a food mill, you can put them in hot and unpeeled; the mill will separate the skin from the flesh.
June is a trusted source on General Cooking.
If you use a food mill to rice your potatoes, it will peel them as it mashes. There's no need to let the potatoes cool.
The less water, the more cream, milk, butter can be soaked up by the potatoes. Similarly, many recipes tell you to put your boiled potatoes back into the pot, minus the water, and then turn on the heat to evaporate the excess water.
A cooked potato slips out of its skin; a raw potato clings to its skin, so if you peel it first, in addition to risking a waterlogged potato, you get less mashed potato. The more people you are cooking for the more this matters. I learned this from my mother in law (my husband has seven brothers). I usually eat the skin myself.
Please enter a valid email address.
Well played. You deserve a cookie.
How one Jewish dessert got so dang popular (& what we lost along the way)
What's the Big Deal About Babka?
One Living Room, Two Ways
Cookware Friends (Hi, Vintage-Inspired Cast Iron!)
When You Just Wanna Cook
Vintage Never Goes Out of Style
prevented successful signup:
We'll never post anything without your permission.
prevented successful login:
Thanks for signing up!
Connect with us to get more Food52!
Get the recipes and features that have us talking, plus first dibs on events and limited-batch products.
(Oh, and $10 off your order of $50 or more in the Food52 Shop, too.)