Any Night Grilling is your guide to becoming a charcoal champion (or getting in your grill-pan groove), any night of the week. With over 60 ways to fire up dinner—no long marinades or low-and-slow cook times in sight—this book is your go-to for freshly grilled meals in a flash.
Order NowPopular on Food52
6 Comments
702551
June 29, 2016
I would refrain from using textural descriptions here, it really depends on the cut of the meat. Filet of beef or a pork tenderloin should be cooked to a lower temperature than oh, let's say brisket/chuck roast, or a pork shoulder roast. The latter two really need to be well-done for the meat to soften and the collagen to melt.
Same with just addressing fish as fish. Different cuts may require different treatment and for sure different fish will cook differently.
One example is salmon. The Japanese cook this fish all the way through, there is no "medium rare" salmon served in normal Japanese cuisine. Traditionally, they don't eat salmon raw as sushi/sashimi either.
This is one of McGee's ongoing faults. He makes sweeping general statements with zero attention to food variations, types of preparations, etc.
McGee brings up some interesting thoughts which sometimes result in some eye-popping conclusions or statements. A lot of those conclusions/statements are based on really poor scientific methodology.
I highly recommend that people do not treat McGee's words or conclusions as gospel. They may occasionally be a good starting point/inspiration for further investigation or research, but they should not be considered as a factual reference.
McGee is a writer (passable), not a food scientist (and a pretty poor at that considering his methodology). Kenji at Serious Eats is a real scientist with reasonable test methodology.
Same with just addressing fish as fish. Different cuts may require different treatment and for sure different fish will cook differently.
One example is salmon. The Japanese cook this fish all the way through, there is no "medium rare" salmon served in normal Japanese cuisine. Traditionally, they don't eat salmon raw as sushi/sashimi either.
This is one of McGee's ongoing faults. He makes sweeping general statements with zero attention to food variations, types of preparations, etc.
McGee brings up some interesting thoughts which sometimes result in some eye-popping conclusions or statements. A lot of those conclusions/statements are based on really poor scientific methodology.
I highly recommend that people do not treat McGee's words or conclusions as gospel. They may occasionally be a good starting point/inspiration for further investigation or research, but they should not be considered as a factual reference.
McGee is a writer (passable), not a food scientist (and a pretty poor at that considering his methodology). Kenji at Serious Eats is a real scientist with reasonable test methodology.
702551
June 29, 2016
Note: I own the second edition of McGee's book, also previous owned the first edition.
M
June 29, 2016
I find the pinker "well-done" a bit strange, since everyone I know who requests well-done does so to avoid any pink colour. Though I wish they'd all at least go for this slightly pink option.
ChefJune
June 29, 2016
I find McGee's temps much more reasonable than the USDA. I don't think they've revised theirs is decades. And, imho, by the time fish flakes, it's quite overcooked.
Join The Conversation