The Piglet2015 / Final Round, 2015

Brooks Headley's Fancy Desserts vs. My Paris Kitchen

Brooks Headley's Fancy Desserts

Brooks Headley

Get the Book

My Paris Kitchen

David Lebovitz

Get the Book

Judged by: Bill Buford

Bill Buford left his position as a fiction editor at The New Yorker to work along Mario Batali at his restaurant, Babbo, in 2005. This experience prompted him to write Heat: An Amateur's Adventures as Kitchen Slave, Line Cook, Pasta-Maker, and Apprentice to a Dante-Quoting Butcher in Tuscany, and to write The New Yorker column, "Notes of a Gastronome." Since then, he has collaborated with Daniel Boulud on his 2013 cookbook, Daniel: My French Cuisine.

The Judgment

David Lebovitz is a cook and a baker and a veteran of Alice Waters’s Chez Panisse, who discovered his writerly voice ten years ago when he began blogging culinary dispatches from Paris on his website. You hear that voice in My Paris Kitchen. It is personal, accessible, chatty, and the book is as much an autobiography as a collection of recipes. It is also, on just about every page, a happy hymn to the City of Light. There are some inspired shorter versions of bistro classics (like slow roasting duck legs in the oven rather than laboriously cooking them in gallons of fat), and some clever insider tricks (substituting cocoa powder for blood in coq au vin, adding an egg or two to a crêpe batter to keep it from running away from you, and bourbon, beer, and ketchup in the sour-sweet French version of pork ribs).  

It also does to me what any good cookbook does to most of us who like reading good cookbooks: They make us want to make food.

In this, reading a good cookbook is different from other reading experiences. Not only does it transport you to another place (for instance, to a condition of wanting to eat food now, please), it transports you into your kitchen. 

The salt cod fritters with tartar sauce, for instance. I love salt cod (brandade de morue); why have I never fried them as fritters? Lebovitz's are killer, especially garnished with a proper tartar (mayonnaise, with equal parts chopped up cornichons, shallots, and capers). I made my mayonnaise, mainly because I will never stop being thrilled at watching what happens to egg yolks and oil when whisked together in a state of panic and fear. With the leftover mayonnaise, I made a celeriac salad. In France, I had discovered that that is what everyone does with their leftover mayonnaise: They mix it with grated celeriac. Lebovitz adds mustard, which makes the dish sing. 

I read his preparation of guinea hen and figs -- the bird cooked in a Dutch oven with wine and stock and root vegetables (with a little flour to make a roux, an old-fashioned and surprisingly happy touch). And I thought: This is what I want to eat right now. Lebovitz’s recipe assumes one guinea hen for four people, which struck me as perfectly sound, as long as everyone is skinny and doesn’t like food and you have five other courses to go with it, plus three desserts. But since I am lucky enough to have a large casserole pot I cooked two birds; and since I was making this in the winter, when there were no figs, I used apples instead, roasting them separately and introducing apple variations (cider, Calvados, cinnamon) to my pot. 

This is the kind of thing a good cookbook does. It makes you make stuff. You feel creative. And you’re not. (Even the apple variations in my pot came from another book.) And yet you are: After all, when you finish a novel -- say, something by Jonathan Franzen -- you don’t get out of your chair and make a family, do you? No. But with a good cookbook you get out of your chair and make food. 

The book is anyone’s winner, unless, like me, you happen to read Fancy Desserts afterwards. 

Wow! Where did this guy come from? And can I make sure that I follow him wherever he goes next?

Since 2008, Brooks Headley has been the pastry chef of Del Posto. Until recently, I was living in France since 2008. (Thus my insider track on what to do with leftover mayonnaise.) My not being in America is not necessarily a reason for my not knowing anything about Brooks Headley (James Beard winner, much celebrated, etc.), but it is a possible one. The fact is: I did know nothing, and had heard nothing, and therefore came to this book as a completely ignorant, uninformed, clueless reader.

And the book is wonderful.

Is it a cookbook? Yes; mainly; sometimes. The photography sucks, deliberately. The color is washed out, deliberately. It’s the opposite of food porn. It’s what you go to if you just wasted an afternoon watching the Food Network.

But is it a cookbook? There is no chapter of pastry kitchen basics -- which is curious in a dessert book -- except that here, there is no basic anything.

The recipes come at you every which way. They are sometimes complete. Some of them probably work. They are all nothing less than very idiosyncratic. And yet they are also, somehow, not arty. 

Maybe it’s not a cookbook.

From it, you might learn how to pickle strawberries (always useful). Or to search out ugly fruit (a relief). Or how to candy fennel, or to smoke your applesauce (who knew?), or to make a gelato from celery or cashews or yeast (!), and to use only with frozen peas (not fresh).

It will deepen your love for vinegar. 

But did I, could I, would I, would you, would anyone actually cook from it? 

Well, a little. I tried the Coca-Cola sauce, which doesn’t actually use Coca-Cola, but simulates it and cites no less an authority than the great Ferran Adrià of El Bulli fame to celebrate the American love of sweet and savory: A burger with ketchup and a Coca-Cola is our national treasure. "Coke is it, man. Coke is it."

I didn’t try to make the brown butter panna cotta and not merely because it would have taken three days. (Okay, maybe that was the reason, but I love the idea of it, and will try to make it, I’m sure of it, probably.) And I also liked the riffing on gelatin. Headley once hated gelatin: "Why do so many pastry chefs use so much gelatin? They rely on the stuff. They worship it! Is it all about control? I prefer being slightly out of control." (He then rediscovers gelatin, and thus the panna cotta. I love gelatin.)

I am, as I write, making the book’s version of the red pepper sauce inspired by the demon Dario Cecchini, the Satanic butcher in Tuscany.

But is this a cookbook? 

I am cooking from it. So, maybe? 

It has a lot of jokes. It has anecdotes about working with Mark Ladner, one of the genius chefs in New York -- and you can never get enough Mark Ladner. It has essays by the Headley’s friends (on sugar, or taste buds, or chocolate). 

It is humble. It is brave. It is extreme. It is wacky. It is by far and away the best anti-cookbook cookbook I have ever read. I will be reading it again and again. It is genius. Bravo, Brooks Headley!

And the winner is…

Brooks Headley's Fancy Desserts

Brooks Headley's Fancy Desserts

Get the Book

Do you Agree?

129 Comments

Pat T. February 18, 2017
Wow - what a surprise. First that the winner made the finals and second that it won! The review shouts that it isn't well written or a cook book. I don't understand. I have to look at the other years and hope that there is more logic and significance to the decision for the "best" of the year.
 
beejay45 February 29, 2016
He liked Fancy Desserts? Really? Buford, in spite of his reputation, has a real knack for turning me off of whatever his subject may be, rather than enticing. Likewise, based on this review I would NEVER buy Headley's book. And that's probably a shame, because it's got a lot going for it -- Buford's lame comments to the contrary.
 
Elisa March 11, 2016
Agreed. 100%.
 
loubaby December 24, 2015
I agree with the below comments; David Lebovitz's cookbook should have won...so surprised by your decision:????
 
Mary October 1, 2015
Mr. Lebovitz's book should have won...hands DOWN...NO CONTEST!
 
Mary October 1, 2015
Have you ever added Pernot to homemade mayonnaise and had with cold lobster and or crab? Add a little lemon juice to the fish before dipping into the mayo and it is AMAZING!! (This is another way the french use their mayonnaise). I detest store bought mayonnaise and refused to try the french version. Someone talked me into tasting it with this catch phrase, "Homemade french mayonnaise is NO WAY LIKE STORE BOUGHT!" I fell for it, and I AM SO GLAD I DID! I LOVE french food; it's my favorite. And this book is as fun to read as Julia Childs, another food artisan who writes as if you were in her kitchen, too. They BOTH write, and it's as if I CAN SMELL what they are cooking in their own kitchens. BUY THIS BOOK NOW!
 
cpc June 25, 2015
NO!!!! My Paris Kitchen has been a staple in my kitchen since I received it at Christmas. I rarely "read" cookbooks, I just make the recipes. This book is just so well written, that I I've read each chapter. Every recipe I've made has been outstanding. Some of these are now my favorite go to's (mustard chicken, buckwheat polenta, steak frites...). There are so many fantastic recipes that it's hard to pick a favorite.
 
Janet M. March 19, 2015
Based on the reviewer's description alone of the two books, it sounds like David Lebovitz's book should have been the winner. The reviewer's explanation of why he chose Brooks Headley's as the winner, does not get the message across. The reviewer liked the way Mr. Headley's book read, but did not like the photos and was not sufficiently inspired to try the recipes. However, he said that he both loved Mr. Lebovitz's voice and his recipes. Then why wasn't Mr. Lebovitz the winner?
 
kasia S. March 19, 2015
I bet that Lebovitz would have a better chance here if he used Buford's Coca Cola sauce in his cookbook, which then Buford would pretend to "cook".
 
Elisa March 11, 2016
Lol. ?
 
Jodi March 17, 2015
The tipsy baker almost fell off her treadmill desk and I almost fell out of my bed. That was wrong, wrong, wrong.
 
lalala March 17, 2015
Buford is a very talented writer and he knows a tremendous amount about cooking? So what. His review with regard to Headley's book seems rushed and does not explain very well his decision. He certainly did not cook much from the book that he chose. One coca-cola sauce and one sauce from his own book, recipe borrowed by Headley. And he should have mentioned this association.
Remember Piglet 2013 when April Bloomfield's book was to be judged by Fergus Henderson? To avoid controversy decision was made by a voice cast of other judges and Henderson only wrote what makes a good cookbook. Why not this time?
 
Margit V. March 17, 2015
Nyborg--maybe a mention of his past association would have been appropriate.
 
Diana March 16, 2015
This does not explain the win! I'd be interested in knowing how many of those who have expressed dissatisfaction with the judgement for Fancy Desserts have ever picked it up and read it. If you haven't, and you are only basing it on its dust jacket (it has none, btw), or what you've read about it, pick it up and read it. That will explain the win. Bill Buford is a very talented writer and he knows a tremendous amount about cooking and fully commits him self to a project when he takes one on, so I am sure he fully considered both books before coming to judgement.
 
Naomi M. March 16, 2015
kasia- wow! That sure does explain a lot, great find!
 
Nyborg March 16, 2015
For those who haven't written any kind of criticism professionally, it would be hard to know that a good critic stands behind what they believe no matter who they're friends with. Sometimes friends get the positive criticism, and sometimes they don't. The only time that such an independent critic compromises themselves, is when they support someone they know or have previously written about in an instance when they are not worthy. For me, that wasn't the case here.
 
kasia S. March 16, 2015
Well this explains the win -

http://www.tipsybaker.com/

 
pbdailey March 16, 2015
I wish the judge for this round hadn't written a whole book about working in Batali's kitchen. It just kind of makes it feel a little non-full-disclosureish.
 
Nyborg March 14, 2015
Loved Buford's review. Rules, even implied ones, are made to be broken.
 
lakelurelady March 13, 2015
I don't get it. But then I would have chosen Mimi Thorisson's "A Kitchen in France" in the first round with "Fancy Desserts". I must be out of touch with what is currently hip.
 
Juliebell March 13, 2015
I think this was my least favorite review. I guess all of the reviews are somewhat emotional and subjective but there seemed to be little other consideration with this one. I love cooking from DL's book and while I'm curious about Headley's book I'm not sure it will be actually used in the kitchen.
 
Margit V. March 13, 2015
Antonia James, you brought the whole brou-ha-ha to its core with your comment. Your wisdom is duly noted and much appreciated. Where did our collective sense of humor hide?
 
THEToughCookie March 12, 2015
Henry Alford's review made me want to buy Brooks Headley's book. Bill Buford's review had me slipping my credit card back into my wallet.
 
Chocolate B. March 13, 2015
Jennifer Reese made an interesting discovery about Buford and Headley:
http://www.tipsybaker.com
 
hobbit2nd March 15, 2015
Wow. That's something that Mr Buford should have been upfront about. Disappointing!
 
TiggyBee March 11, 2015
I'm in the throes of a moderate to severe case of post-Piglet depression.
 
AntoniaJames March 11, 2015
Do I agree? Well, I don't agree, but then I also don't disagree. Like others who have commented, I was a bit surprised by the all-out emotional response (vs testing of recipes) that seems to have driven the decision. Were I actually to consider buying "Fancy Desserts," I'd simply seek more comprehensive reviews of the merits of the recipes, elsewhere. I like diversity in approach, realizing that we are all human, and all respond differently -- and on different bases -- to things like cookbooks. This is all about having fun, ultimately, isn't it? I'm not aggrieved, and I am fairly certain that Mr Lebovitz isn't, either. ;o)
 
minibakersupreme March 13, 2015
In case you do want to buy Fancy Desserts, I have it and the recipes do work. I've tried many of them and the instructions are great, as well as interesting. My love for the book may come from being married to a musician, but it also comes from loving a good story. The recipes are good together but also good for mixing up with other things you know and love.
 
bonbonmarie March 11, 2015
How the reviewer could mention David's obsession-worthy brandade de morue yet select the anti-cookbook is beyond me. Cheers to My Paris Kitchen, my winner.
 
Judy March 11, 2015
I have followed every round of Piglet, and each time Fancy Desserts advances, I grab my copy off the shelf and think ok this is the day I will make something. I agree with the review, it is the anti-cookbook. I will now file it away in a different part of the library. I will buy My Paris Kitchen and begin cooking immediately.
 
normnchris March 11, 2015
Disappointed, why choose an anti-cookbook?
 
Naomi M. March 11, 2015
BTW Smashing Plates has sold out for now on Amazon, so all the books the piglet selects, winner or not, are getting a lot of extra sales!
 
Naomi M. March 11, 2015
I don't think the outcome will hurt anyone's sales! But it is always fun to read the piglet no matter if I disagree, and I frequently have in years past when I bought most new cookbooks as they were released. The judges in these final rounds have to be cooking I would think from about 4 books in order to come up with a day-after the winners are announced type of decision. And if they are getting them first in the mail, buying ingredients, etc. they had to have them early enough.
 
Pamela T. March 11, 2015
I could not disagree more. I own both books. "Fancy Desserts" was fund to look at for a minute and then I wondered why I bought it. "My Paris Kitchen" is already splattered and dog eared from having been used repeatedly. I can't even imagine why an "anti cookbook" would be the winner. Doesn't that defeat the purpose of this contest? So disappointed!
 
kasia S. March 11, 2015
Looks like they just wanted a controversy and they got it, good or bad it's publicity while the true point gets lost once again
 
Margit V. March 11, 2015
My typing got jumbled. I hope the meaning is not totally lost.
 
Margit V. March 11, 2015
One question I have is what are the ground rules, the criteria upon which judgement is. Based? It seems to me that there are none. That it is each judge's idiosyncratic pick, sometimes (as in this case)without even cooking/baking a handful of recipes. So, in a way, Food 52 weights the scale by the choice of who is the judge. In so doing, can make the reader feel "jerked around". Not a good feelingfeeling, then, in an effort to be opeminded, fair, whatever -- we try to honor the result. This time, it just doesn't sit well.
 
luvcookbooks March 11, 2015
Finished paging through Fancy Desserts last night. Must admit I am helplessly in love with scrapbooks, autobiography, racy recipes like candied cantaloupe. Also a friend loves the panna cotta at Del Posto and the recipe is IN the book! The essay about the prep cook from El Salvador should provoke some thoughts. Beautiful choice, also love David Lebovitz, who showed me how to cAndy citron. After my next visit to Italy (last 1992, don't had breath), mostarda do Cremona!
 
luvcookbooks March 11, 2015
Mostarda di Cremona
 
zephyr050 March 11, 2015
Mr Buford has convinced me: David's book is one that I will cook from and worth buying. The other is not.
 
LeBec F. March 11, 2015
COOKBOOKCHICK, as usual, i completely agree with you in thanking kate.
I must, however, say how disappointed I am in the 'lazy way out' actions of this particular reviewer, Bill Buford. Perhaps the reviewers are not paid, so they don't feel bad handing in a piece of non-work like his...? Did he not realize the serious responsibility that he was handed by 52? To quote 52er ruckford_pie:
" No hate to Brooks - his book was very interesting and really groundbreaking in its anti-style but the Lebovitz book is the one that will be dogeared and worn and spattered in less than a year. And... is it not a cookbook contest? Should'nt they be required to cook from it in some considered way and not just make some sauces? "
 
lisabu March 12, 2015
@cookbookchick I made that Chicken with Mustard recipe tonight also! Absolutely fantastic. Now I am coveting that beautiful copper pot he cooks it in. David for the win!
 
HeatherM March 12, 2015
How have I not made the cover recipe yet? I've made the merguez meatballs twice - baked, not fried. So easy and everyone LOVES them at parties.
 
Lisa March 12, 2015
Ooh I just saw that review. I used my large all-clad but even with the bacon fat and olive oil the chicken stuck to the pan. All that mustard. Lovely fond but I hate it when the skin comes off.
 
smittycdm December 28, 2015
I learned that too from Aspen Cooking School. Five Stars to David.
 
Elizabeth G. March 11, 2015
Oh well! David Lebovitz is clearly the king of hearts though!
 
heyjude March 11, 2015
I hope David is feeling the love that members are sending his way. Thanks to all the judges for making this an interesting Piglet.
 
Sj D. March 11, 2015
its so disheartening to see that David lost! IMHO his book was definitely one of the most rounded with beautiful recipes and words to match
 
Megan March 10, 2015
Disagree As I am not into fussy cooking
 
Bridget March 10, 2015
Thoroughly enjoyed the Piglet but have to say this was one of my least favourite reviews and it has nothing to do with the outcome of the challenge. I love the stories in well written cookbooks. I love inspiration. This however was like reading an amazon review where the reader gives a book a five star rating without having having actually cooked a recipe.
 
Linn March 10, 2015
My Paris Kitchen all the way! Not a fan of fussy desserts.
 
rucker_pie March 10, 2015
OH HOW SAD he made some sauces, SAUCES from the Fancy book - so terrible! The Lebovitz book, though traditional actually makes you want to cook! This review reminds me of being in the kitchen with all dudes, dudes being dude like and patting one another on the back for being dudes and making weird art school concoctions for the hell of it all. And David, meanwhile, he is the friend you want in the kitchen cause he can make you a nice lunch and tell you a story. No hate to Brooks - his book was very interesting and really groundbreaking in its anti-style but the Lebovitz book is the one that will be dogeared and warn and spattered in less than a year. And... is it not a cookbook contest? Should't they be required to cook from it in some considered way and not just make some sauces?
 
Diana March 10, 2015
Both will be dogeared in my kitchen.
 
mngirlinnorcal March 10, 2015
Oh I wanted David Lebovitz to win! Maybe because it seems more my style of cooking. I have My Paris Kitchen and have made many lovely recipes. The review was good but still not enough for me to buy Fancy Desserts.
 
Amy H. March 10, 2015
me too
 
Lemongrass&Lime March 10, 2015
Fantastic Piglet! Quality of the reviews overall was so much improved after last year. I enjoy the controversy and debate that surrounds the winner each year and will be purchasing several of the books reviewed. Thanks Food52 for a fun contest!
 
Connie C. March 10, 2015
Yes! Even though I am not enamored of the bad boy/girl school, I enjoy the dynamic of this entire endeavor, the discussion, the disagreement, the education, the erudition. I have discovered countless books which I would never have found had I not stumbled upon this site. What a great trip this is! I look forward to next year's ride.
 
Pam H. March 10, 2015
I love The Piglet! Not only are the reviews highly engaging, entertaining, and informative, but the comments are as well. I was rooting for David Lebovitz, but am intrigued by the Fancy Desserts book. Also, I looked back since The Piglet's inception in 2010, and it's interesting to note that all of the winners (and reviewers) have seemed controversial and weren't always the obvious selection. I'm happy to be a reader of Food52, where the content isn't dumbed down, and the art of cooking is elevated and celebrated.
 
Lemongrass&Lime March 10, 2015
Agreed, Pam!
 
Connie C. March 10, 2015
An enthusiastic ditto here.
 
Maia March 10, 2015
Despite my rooting for David, I'll say this: you should buy FD just as a coffee table manifesto. As a pastry chef I was uninspired; as an anarcho-socialist who believes in the ugly produce, the elimination of waste and the utter joy of food, I was reminded why I cook.
 
Maia March 10, 2015
Wow. I guess being punk is in again. David provides a real cookbook... But we all know that he is the best real pastry chef out there, a true baker. But maybe piglet isn't about what's real- maybe it's about fantasy, us wanting that James Beard Award, us wishing we had the guts to churn celery ice cream, us wishing we lived in NYC where people will actually try that ice cream. So yay Brooks, but there's a reason I own every Lebovitz book.
 
Kate March 10, 2015
I love David SO much, and though I don't own this book I do own many of his others and use them a lot. The fact that David hasn't won a Piglet is sad.
But coming in to the Piglet all I wanted was to see how Brooks would do, because his book is incredible. Its innovative and inspiring and I have cooked plenty from it with great results. This book has truly changed the way I think about food.
I've seen so many lists on the top cookbooks of 2014 where Greenspan and Lebovitz dominated and Headley was overlooked. I think the head to head format of this competition has really helped this book get the recognition it deserves.
 
Megan March 10, 2015
I agree with cookbookchick! Thanks for your perspective.
 
Kate March 10, 2015
No worries, guys. You should look at the round where Fancy Desserts took down Flavour Flours and you will get a much better perspective. That review was great, this one was... not.
 
Connie C. March 10, 2015
I am new to this site, having stumbled upon it recently from another food page I frequent. I went back to the first Piglet year and have read through every single bracket of every year.
I was not at all familiar with many of the reviewers/chefs/cooks, but one that caught my attention was Edward Lee's judgment. I was fascinated by his articulateness, his erudition. I found his writing thoroughly engaging and made a mental not to look into his work.
Imagine my surprise when he later turned up as a "contestant." His essays spoke to me and I knew, even though I do not cook in his style, that I must browse through his "Smoke and Pickles."
Yes, his review was great. The best yet I've read on this site. Even though "Fancy Desserts" does not appeal to me on any level, I enjoy the reads, the education, the exposure to the unfamiliar.
Exactly what I love about food52.
 
rosalind5 March 10, 2015
Smoke and Pickles is a wonderful cookbook. His rice bowls - I've tried chicken, beef and pork - are triumphs, perfect for family dinner.
 
ChefJune March 10, 2015
It would be interesting to see what Food52ers think of Fancy Desserts after they've had a chance to bake from it.
 
kasia S. March 10, 2015
It would be interesting to see what BILL BUFORD would bake from it, since he hasn't.
 
dagmaraelza March 10, 2015
Interesting idea. Can we start a separate tab where people post their experiences with the winning book?
 
penelope March 11, 2015
There's a thread on Chowhound for people to post who have actually cooked from the Piglet books -- you know, unlike some of the "reviewers".
 
Shannon March 10, 2015
I have enjoyed Piglet 2015. Ordered My Paris Kitchen last week. The reviews helped me select this book.I know I will have fun!!!!
 
kasia S. March 10, 2015
I dont have any sense of what the winning cookbook is about, make TWO sauces out of it is hardly comparable to all the cooking done from the other book.
 
GinaP March 10, 2015
Most surprising Piglet year so far
 
cookinginvictoria March 10, 2015
I'm sad to see David not win, but I won't comment any further since I haven't had a chance to check out Fancy Desserts yet. Based on this and other prior Piglet books, it sounds like FD is a really unusual and groundbreaking book that is like nothing else out there. Can't wait to take a look at it and hopefully cook from it. However, I will say that after reading everyone's responses here, I really miss the input of the community judges in the final judgment this year. :)

Just wanted to give a shout out too to the Food52 editors and say thank you so much for another fabulous Piglet this year! I really enjoyed all of the books covered both in the main competition and in the Community Picks sidebar. The judging and writing was stellar and set the bar really high for next year. I loved reading about so many wonderful-soundiing cookbooks and have put many of them on my ever-expanding wish list. This is such a wonderful event -- I look forward to it all year!
 
Megan March 10, 2015
This has been a most interesting Piglet and I can't wait for next year! Given the previous reviews, I thought it was certainly possible that Fancy Desserts would win. It seems like it must be something special (even though it doesn't appeal to me at all- but I haven't looked at it in person). However, I found this reviewer's rationale for his choice especially odd. I wish he would have cooked more recipes from the winning book. Oh well! Love the Piglet!!
 
QueenSashy March 10, 2015
If The Piglet were so predictable and crowd-pleasing, than it would not be The Piglet anymore :) I have David's book and still deciding whether to get Fancy Desserts. While the previous reviews took me a couple of feet closer to the bookstore, this one, surprisingly, had the opposite effect. Nevertheless, this has been an amazing Piglet, the best one so far.
 
lazychef March 10, 2015
Wow, I have to say - I'm kind of surprised at the negativity in the comments section here. I completely understand the love for Lebovitz (his ice cream recipes are my go-tos), but it's clear from this and prior reviews that Fancy Desserts is a unique and fascinating cookbook. It's been an amazing Piglet, and the fact that only one of the deserving finalists can "win" shouldn't take anything away from either book. I'm planning to get both!
 
Diana March 10, 2015
I am so glad someone finally had the courage to write this sentiment. It is one thing to disagree, quite another to dump on the winning book and/or the Judge. Lazy, you'll enjoy both books. They are both amazing in their own ways.
 
mrslarkin March 10, 2015
Hear hear, lazychef! I'm glad for all the Piglet books! And judges, too.
 
Cindy March 10, 2015
Total upset. I thought David would win for sure. I own both books but I will probably cook more out of David's.
 
JK March 10, 2015
This is one of the worst reviews I've ever seen.

 
kasia S. March 10, 2015
I'd say.. It's not a cookbook and the guy made sauce.. at least the other reviewers put in some effort.
 
Alexandra H. March 10, 2015
A la Bastille, Food52ers! REVOLT! :)
I, like the majority below, am baffled by this outcome. I own both books, and while Headley's book initially provided lots of 'wow factor' and some interesting insight into his thought process as a pastry chef, all that razzle-dazzle has subsided and settled on a bookshelf. Lebovitz's book, however, continues to inspire and comfort me. I could recount more than a dozen personal stories Lebovitz told, as if they were told to me around a cozy table, in front of a roaring fireplace, with a lush glass of Bordeaux and a fabulous meal. I reach for it weekly. Headley? I remember a few of his tricks here and there, but in the way that I would remember a punk kid who tore through a fancy restaurant on a skateboard, versus Lebovitz who established a genuine dialogue and sense of culinary intimacy with his readers. Kudos to Headley for the win, but for me, Lebovitz was the clear winner.
 
Connie C. March 10, 2015
Your comment is better than the review.
 
Alexandra H. March 10, 2015
Too funny-- thanks, Connie C! :)
 
SeeSee March 10, 2015
You nailed it for me, too.
 
Naomi M. March 10, 2015
Well I think I must order Paris Kitchen after your comments. Was on the fence. I have way way too many books and need to thin them down. Fancy Desserts would be one I would look through once probably, but I have tried hard to curb by cookbook buying to only ones with things we would actually make! And for better health at that!
 
rosalind5 March 10, 2015
Oh well. Everything this year with the Piglet has led me to anticipate this result. But I'm still disappointed.
 
pandapotamus March 10, 2015
wow, David got robbed!
 
dymnyno March 10, 2015
Comparing these two books is like apples and oranges. No matter how great a cookbook each of them may be, there are too many differences in subject matter and style to compare them. Didn't the Piglet used to have a Wildcard that gave a former loser (like Heritage) a second chance?
 
Diana March 10, 2015
I do agree. I own both books and have cooked many things out of My Paris Kitchen and I am sure I will make many more. But, comparing the two, side by side, Fancy Desserts is in a class of it's own. There is nothing else like it out there. Not to bake out of, learn from, inspire you, or just read. I loved reading both books cover to cover and both have a place on my shelf but Brooks Headley has does something brilliant here, and it needs to be acknowledged. And yes, I will make desserts from it.
 
Tippy C. March 10, 2015
Nope. I don't agree. But I am not at all surprised. Bill Buford has long been fascinated by the rebels and rule breakers of the world. However, in this case, while Headley's book has a great deal to recommend it, and I can see why it advanced earlier in the competition, it cannot compare in quality to Lebovitz's book. In five years, I predict that it will be completely forgotten along with other flashy, stylish trends, while "My Paris Kitchen" will be in heavy rotation in many of our kitchens.
 
Michelle P. March 10, 2015
Wrong decision. I cook from David's book all the time... his ice cream book is my bible and MPK is one of the best cookbooks I own. I checked out Headley's book from the library (rarely invest unless I make at least ten recipes from a book) and I am sorry, but it was a turn off in so many ways. Maybe I am not 'cool' enough to get it, but I still think this decision is extremely off.
 
love2cook March 10, 2015
What an incredibly disappointing result--the "anti-cookbook cookbook" wins. Really?!
 
EllieA March 10, 2015
Nothing said in the review made me want to even open the Headley book. As most others have asked, why make an anti-cookbook the top pick in a cookbook contest? Contrarily, Buford's positive review of My Paris Kitchen did entice me to consider not only opening, but buying the book, despite plenty of French cookbooks in my library.
 
allie March 10, 2015
This is a baffling winner -- perhaps this book is truly genius (the prior reviews of it in piglet made me think it would be a winner), but shouldn't this review actually help us understand why it's so amazing -- and actually cook from it?
 
LJ S. March 10, 2015
Nope.
 
chels March 10, 2015
He really should have made more than one recipe (and just a sauce at that) from the cookbook that he chose...the other recipes may be intriguing, but they could still be terrible! I'm especially disappointed since he had so much success from David's book. It doesn't seem fair.
 
PA_Mom March 10, 2015
Don't agree at all. David writes beautifully and his recipes are always spot on! I think you guys picked the winner just so you could show yourselves as too cool for (cooking) school. An anti-cookbook cookbook?!!! Pfft! Whatever...
 
Phillie F. March 10, 2015
I am completely confused as to why this book won. I do not agree at all. I really, truly believe that you need to revisit the rules of the Piglet if this book won. I have absolutely no interest in an anti-cookbook cookbook. Also, it appears that there is some conflict of interest here...the Mario Batali factor since the judge and the cookbook author both work/worked for Mario.
 
Sipa March 10, 2015
As soon as I saw who was judging this one I knew it would go to Headley. The bad boy mystic had to win.
 
Sara S. March 10, 2015
How much time do you give the reviewers to look at each book? Wouldn't you have just found out yesterday that the Lebovitz book was going to be up against Headley? How does this work?
 
dymnyno March 10, 2015
Like most everyone so far, I am confused as to why this book won! The reviewer did a very bad job of writing a cliff hanger of a review....I didn't feel saved by the final choice...I felt pushed off the cliff.
 
Connie C. March 10, 2015
I love your imagery. Very apt. I totally agree.
 
Bevi March 10, 2015
I completely agree. I am scratching my head.
 
ChefJune March 10, 2015
Count me among the legions here who have no interest in the winning cookbook. If this is the future of cookbooks, cookbook authors BEWARE!
OTOH, I MUST have David's new book Bill's review of it had me absolutely salivating. It's about time I came face to face with celeriac!
 
Alene C. March 10, 2015
How can a "sometimes" at best cookbook win a COOKBOOK contest?!? I have absolutely no interest in this book and find it baffling how it could be chosen over the other cookbook, or ANY cookbook, as the best - if it is indeed as described. I have David's book and find it a winner in my cookbook collection.
 
soosie March 10, 2015
David -- you was robbed!
 
Connie C. March 10, 2015
Bad boys (and girls) are inducing ennui. Despite having read all the judgments and most comments, there is nothing about "Fancy Desserts" that I found appealing. I'll stick with David Lebovitz, thank you.
Still, it was a fun year and I enjoyed the reviews as well as the ongoing tennis match in the recipe/personality debate.
Thanks to all the reviewers who spent so many hours reading, testing, and writing. The prose to be found in them is literary as well as informative and much appreciated.
 
nancy O. March 10, 2015
I have not the remotest interest in the winning book, but c'est le piglet!
 
sexyLAMBCHOPx March 10, 2015
wow! great review. i need both book...now!
 
a.c.901 March 10, 2015
This was a roller-coaster of a review. The whole time I was thinking "It has to be Paris" and out of nowhere it was desserts. Either way, I want to spend the rest of the day in a kitchen.
 
alison March 10, 2015
I have not seen either of these books, but will be doing so, thus I can only go by the review. I think Bill Buford is probably familiar with David Lebovitz's cuisine and, though some of the recipes may be new, the whole is within his comfort zone. On the other hand, Brooks Headley's book is a fresh arena, both in food and style. Isn't the reason we buy more cookbooks, because we want to learn new things? So, yes, I agree with this review.
 
M S. March 10, 2015
Don't agree at all. Terrible decision. Desserts and sweets aren't even good for you....many are managing to move away from them. Then, these sweets and desserts are, to use the cliche, over the top. The Lebovitz book provides so much for a large audience. I wouldn't know what to do with the designated winner or have the time to do it. And if "creativity" is the criteria, my god, chefs are doing amazing things all over the world for very limited numbers of eaters,then, the book should be judged amongst its peers.
 
booglix March 10, 2015
I do wish Bill Buford had reported on the results of more than one recipe from Fancy Desserts (the Coca Cola sauce)...
 
Jordan March 10, 2015
This is the first time I've read a Piglet review that doesn't sound glowing and doesn't remotely entice me to try recipes from the book, yet it still won? Hmm.
 
booglix March 10, 2015
I've been really surprised by the repeated wins of Fancy Desserts, and it's not the cookbook I most want to own from this bunch. Part of me thinks, really? A book of strange recipes and candies that I would make only on rare occasions? And one that looks highly self-consciously hip at that? But I'm certainly intrigued by it, and want to check it out. Also want to try Mr. Headley's veggie burgers!

Also, as much as I like David Lebovitz - I'm a longtime fan - there's something refreshing about a boundary-pushing book that people might not have otherwise noticed winning over a book of French recipes.
 
Naomi M. March 10, 2015
Surprise ending! But none of the desserts mentioned sound remotely like something I want to make! But I would love to read Fancy Desserts!
 
witloof March 10, 2015
I don't get it. The judge, who is an obsessive cook, {let us not forget he quit his job as fiction editor of The New Yorker to stage with Mario Batali} cooks one brilliant recipe after another from MPK, is not especially moved to cook much, if at all, from the Headley book, and then declares the Headley book the winner?

My theory: I think everyone who pushed this book through {male judges all} got
seduced by the cool hip bad boy vibe Headley projects. They wanted to be identified with the badass {who coincidentally works for Mario Batali, so slight conflict of interest here}. Ugh.
 
witloof March 10, 2015
Oh, and in my annoyance with the judgment forgot to mention that Bill Buford wrote a long, adoring memoir, in which he idolizes his subject beyond all imagining, about Mario Batali.
 
beejay45 February 29, 2016
Totally an aside...I really couldn't get into Heat. In the first page and a half, he comments on how huge Batali is/was, how immense, oh, and did I mention that the guy's enormous. Please! I think everyone knows he's a big guy. Way to shut down interest in his "adoring memoir." My mom's copy made the rounds of family and friends, but no one could get past that opening obsession. So, have to agree that this win seems totally wack.
 
Mary D. March 10, 2015
I sort of feel like this won because pastry is so mysterious to cooks, and doing pastry in such a "cool" way makes it not embarrassing for them to look at (versus something like Alice Medrich's book, which is more inspiring and cook-able, but being about baking makes it decidedly feminine). I suppose I just have an issue with a book that hardly inspires you to get into the kitchen winning over such an accessible book. I work in pastry and I found little inspiration (at least in the, oh my gosh, I have to get in the kitchen right now, way) from Fancy Desserts. But it wasn't my decision to make! Congrats
 
Emmy March 10, 2015
Mary- yes! I mean, I definitely want to check out Headley's book from the library just to see what the big fuss is all bout, but I personally have little patience for the whole "punk rock" pastry approach. I've worked in kitchens where that was the aesthetic, and I haven't felt like it was any more "authentic" or "real" than a more classic approach, all else equal. We all know at the end of the day that when we need a foolproof tart dough we'll be paging through a book by Alice Medrich, or Dorie Greenspan, or Rose Levy Berenbaum, or heck even Martha Stewart.
 
vegetalmatters March 10, 2015
I'm sad, because I've cooked from and love My Paris Kitchen, but I am certainly inspired to check out Fancy Desserts now.
 
Victoria C. March 10, 2015
Agree with cookbookchick. Wow. Wow. Wow.

I make a delicious Alice Medrich cake, which calls for you to use almonds and grind them yourself. Without a contrary instruction, I have always used unblanced raw almonds, which give the cake a lovely color because the almonds still have their skins. HOWEVER, in Fancy Desserts Brooks Headley says that almond flour is good but has no flavor unless it's toasted. So now, since what I am doing is actually making my own almond flour for this cake, per Brooks Headley, I blitz the almonds in my food processor and then toast them for five minutes in a 325 degree oven. The cake I have made for YEARS is improved by this little change.

And just as I got to the end of this review, before I saw who won, I had to jump up because the timer went off on the toasting almonds. HaHa. What fun to come back and see who "won."

But they both win - each is a great book! Congratulations.
 
txchick57 March 10, 2015
No, I don't agree. That review killed any desire I ever had to buy that Fancy Desserts which wasn't too strong to begin with
 
dana March 10, 2015
i love DL's books, but I'm excited to find a new chef
 
mcs3000 March 10, 2015
YES!