The Piglet2018 / Quarterfinal Round, 2018

The Pho Cookbook vs. Night + Market

The Pho Cookbook

Andrea Nguyen

Get the Book

Night + Market

Kris Yenbamroong & Garrett Snyder

Get the Book

Judged by: Jen Agg

Toronto restaurateur Jen Agg, the woman behind the popular The Black Hoof, Cocktail Bar, Rhum Corner, Agrikol and Grey Gardens restaurants, is known for her frank and often hilarious observations and ideas on the restaurant industry and the world around her. Her book, I Hear She's a Real Bitch, is a national bestseller and was shortlisted as a Best Book of 2017 by The Globe & Mail and The National Post.

The Judgment

Editor’s note: Each Piglet judge receives a cheat sheet on how the tournament works—how to approach the judging process, our expectations for a review, and more. One of our asks is that judges cook at least 3 recipes from each book they’re evaluating. As Piglet superfans know, many judges go above and beyond, preparing far more than the 6 recipes asked of them. Today’s judge chose to approach her review in a different way.

I adore cookbooks. I covet them, I collect them, and I appreciate them as guides to the food of other cultures, or other worlds. But I don’t use them—at least, not to cook from.

Even at the outset of this project, I didn’t really have any intention of cooking from these books: I’m renovating my kitchen, travelling a lot and mourning the death of my beloved dad. But the truth is I don’t cook from cookbooks, even when the extenuating circumstances aren’t so destabilizing.

That said, I appreciate what cookbooks can do. Which is partly why I chose to advance the book I did; it doesn’t just introduce you to the food of another culture, it creates its own world, one you’d happily inhabit permanently.

But we’re not there yet. First, you should know that both of these cookbooks are excellent guides.

 

Food writer and educator Andrea Nguyen’s The Pho Cookbook—pronounced “faww,” in this case (if there were a side hook on the “o,” it would be “fuh”)—opens with a beautiful essay on pho’s origins, weaving class, colonialism, and modernity vs. history into a genesis narrative of the beef and noodle soup, so specific to Vietnam, to a time and a place.

She goes on to offer incredibly detailed instructions for ingredient and equipment preparation (including a reminder to use good water, which I love). All the elements of a great pho broth are given consideration. There’s a how and why for everything, which makes perfect sense: this is a book totally devoted to one thing, from cover to cover. It’s all pho, all the time (which is not a criticism—I am very much of the “do one thing really well” school).

 

Cookbook covers often provide a lot of content clues and the cover of chef/restaurateur Kris Yenbamroong’s Night + Market is no exception. The heavy-flash, blown-out look is a nod to a photographic style popularized by VICE and, no doubt, to the too-bright lighting at its namesake Silver Lake restaurant, Night + Market Song. (TBH, Night + Market’s lighting drove me crazy when I ate there a few years ago, even though I understood it as a specific wink at “authenticity.” But also, fuck authenticity—we are all capable of holding more than one idea in our heads at the same time).

The cover’s high-low mix of a Pét-Nat-ish sparkling wine—label casually turned half-away so as to only connect with it-getters—alongside a basic Thai beer (that probably costs too much once it’s imported) is an instant way to slyly identify yourself as my favorite type of person: the discerning snob who somehow is completely without pretension.

There’s this insane idea that some people have about “cool,” low-budget, (*gulp*) hipster-y restaurants: that they are the height of pretension. It’s an ironic conclusion to draw, considering how little money went into making, say, The Black Hoof (disclaimer: I own the joint), or—I assume—Kris’s restaurants. Thanks to pioneers like David Chang, more than a decade after the restaurant revolution in the mid-aughts, young people opening spots they might actually want to hang out in and can sort-of afford to eat in isn’t a novelty, it’s a category.

Night + Market the book is an exploration of this category—there’s the superfluous plus sign (“for the record, it’s just pronounced Night Market”); the forward by Pok Pok’s Andy Ricker; the author’s intro in black print on mustard-yellow pages (if you have trouble reading it, you’re too damn old). Then there are the stories preceding each recipe, each one funny, detailed, heartfelt, and direct. For example, a headnote begins like this: “Things that were ahead of their time: Nikola Tesla, Twin Peaks, Pets.com, and Golden Triangles.” This appropriately leads into a recipe for Golden Triangles, which Kris describes as “seafood mortadella pancakes,” while acknowledging this as a “weird visual.” It’s a pretty direct call-out to a certain type of person born basically anytime after 1975 and before 1985. As I started reading I fell into Kris’ universe, one that’s informed by the clearly massive influence of his paternal grandma and his having grown up in the family business of restaurants. It’s anchored by a life lived in LA, and a love of chenin.  WHAT IS NOT TO LOVE?

I enjoyed hanging out with a lot of the recipes, but Crispy Pig Tails tickled me in two ways. One, it talks about a few of my fave things: pig tails, Jonathan Gold, and Anthony Bourdain. At the same time, it serves as an illustrative reminder of the importance for a restaurant like this to be “blessed.” The approval of a food writer like Gold and heavyweights of the industry is often the difference between a restaurant that barely survives and one that thrives. You’ll notice that they’re all men. I did. (ALWAYS BE ON BRAND.)

 

Despite being a feminist killjoy, one of the things I most enjoy killing is a bottle of wine. I also really like having fun, and this book brings the fun + great wine suggestions all over the place (you pronounce it “plus” in this context). There’s a Thai Beef Jerky recipe that looks great, a hot tip for why stir-fried packaged ramen noodles are superior to reconstituted, and photography that highlights all the people who make Night + Market (and Night + Market Song) what they are.

By comparison, Andrea Nguyen’s The Pho Cookbook, while a loving ode, is a lot more staid. Everything from ingredients to assembly is (as mentioned) laid out in great detail, the photography is lush and beautiful, and the recipes enticing. I feel it could benefit from a little tongue-in-cheek playfulness. But that’s a minor complaint.

Like I said, both of these are excellent guides. Neither will disappoint readers, research junkies, or food-culture vultures. Kris’s book just spoke to me more, in the sense that there is shared language, a certain sort of approach to restaurants, and a firm understanding that the level of fun achievable in this “world of food” is inversely proportional to how seriously one takes oneself and one’s “cuisine.” It’s a delightful lesson in self-awareness, and a friendly reminder that you probably shouldn’t invest too much ego in something that turns to shit so fast.

Night + Market takes it.

 

And the winner is…

Night + Market

Night + Market

Get the Book

Do you Agree?

131 Comments

bbbUs3r November 21, 2020
I can't stand it!!! I had to go through that whole account process just to write this one comment...How prejudice are you guys against us older folks! I quote from above: "(if you have trouble reading it, you’re too damn old)" REALLY!!!! Some of us old people are the reason you have the technology you currently have! I give up on you guys, our society is in real sorry shape.#
 
bbbUs3r November 21, 2020
I can't stand it!!! I had to go through that whole account process just to write this one comment...How prejudice are you guys against us older folks! I quote from above: "(if you have trouble reading it, you’re too damn old)" REALLY!!!! Some of us old people are the reason you have the technology you currently have! I give up on you guys, our society is in real sorry shape.
 
Yvonne April 9, 2018
If anyone has read Jen Agg's biography then this review would not be a shock! BTW - she isn't a chef but is brilliant at designing, setting up and running restaurants. I might buy both books based on her comments.
 
lgoldenhar April 3, 2018
I have not read all of the comments, but I can tell they are mostly negative of Jen's review. Relax people! The Piglet is all in fun. In my opinion, the competition highlights books that might not be on my radar and give a taste of what I might want to consider giving a more in depth review on my own (by going to the library and checking out the book first before I buy it). Testing three random recipes based on what the cookbook judge thinks looks good, wants to try, and based on their cooking ability, is incredibly subjective. Honestly, none of the judge's reviews are substitutes for my own review of a cookbook. My advice, use these reviews to pique your interest, check the book out from the library, read through the entire cookbook without ticking off any recipes, then go back through and choose the recipes you want to try (at least one from each chapter). I learned this method from Food52 and it is a great way for me to decide on a cookbook.

I thought this was an interesting, out-of-the-box review that focused on the "other" elements of a cookbook that elevate it beyond just a collection of recipes. There are have definitely been cookbooks that I enjoyed just reading, but not cooking from and I appreciate that Jen focused on that side how to appreciate a cookbook.
 
g. M. April 2, 2018
This is a shameless attempt by Food52 to stir up controversy. Things weren't exciting enough this year I guess. Sad.
 
petalpusher April 2, 2018
I'm sorry you weren't able to give this project much of your attention. I understand how losing a parent is also hard. I think you should have declined to be a judge in this competition as it makes it very obvious you don't respect other people's projects - only your own self promotion.
So the only judgement involved in this review is the Food 52 readership of your attempt at humor. Pretty unappetizing.
 
ChefJune April 2, 2018
I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable. If she didn't intend to cook from the books, that should have been made known to you at Food52 up front. And then, when she didn't cook from the books, seems you should have found a substitute judge for this phase. There are plenty of us out here who would have gladly stepped in in the emergency!
I don't know either of these books, but I have to say this is patently unfair.
There must be a way you can prevent this from occurring in the future.
As a longtime member of the Food52 community, a former chef and an avid cook, I'm insulted.
 
CocoJuju March 31, 2018
I just wasted my time reading this AWFUL review! Honestly, if you signed up to as a judge, at least cook some dishes from the books. Don't sign up to give me book design comments. This just infuriates me as it is completely unfair to both books and the spirit of the Piglet competition. Ugh.
 
Jess March 30, 2018
Ummmm..what?? Sorry, Andrea! You definitely didn't get a fair shake. I've loved the recipes in your pho book and have been using it frequently!
 
Ida B. March 30, 2018
Worst. Cookbook. Review. Ever.

If money was paid, get it back!

This review was an absolute waste of time. Once the writer (I will not dignify the author as a reviewer) decided NOT to follow the guidelines of actually COOKING, the editors should have REJECTED the output.

Shame on the woman who insulted both books, the readers, the editors and the spirit of the Piglet.
 
Fresh T. March 30, 2018
Format is important, but do the recipes work? Are they tasty? We still don't know. Shame on the reviewer and shame on Food52 for allowing this. It's not the type of controversy that's good. - Bad.
 
OnionThief March 29, 2018
the bottom line is that this review didn't help me to know anything important about either book. it was useless.
 
AntoniaJames March 29, 2018
Reading today's judgment (Kevin Kwan's), I cannot help but think what a better outcome we might have seen with this one, had the judge taken a page from Kwan's book, and recruited several friends to test the recipes and enjoy those meals together. Indeed, I can think of no better way to deal with the sadness of losing someone you love. I've been there: https://food52.com/blog/7313-essays-the-perfect-gift ;o)
 
Celia S. March 29, 2018
I loved this as a cookbook design review, but feel like it's awfully unfair to choose a book in a competition about the best cookbook (to cook from) based on looks and writing style. I appreciate Food52's requirement that each judge cook at least 6 recipes, and think that should be strictly adhered to.
 
Incohatus March 29, 2018
I’m torn- on the one hand, I appreciate the diverse approaches to cooking reflected in the judging panel and there are plenty of people who appreciate reading cookbooks without cooking from them. On the other hand, this is a competition with rules and I don’t think you should participate in a competition whose rules you have no intention of following. One of the things that irks, perhaps, is her tone of breezy dismissal coupled with absolute authority (she never cooks from cookbooks but still has the expertise to judge them), her focus on restaurant culture rather than the books, and name dropping her own restaurant.
 
healthierkitchen March 29, 2018
Yes!!
 
Janet March 28, 2018
If you can’t read the print on the yellow paper you are too damn old? Wow. I’d say you are too damn immature to be writing a review.
 
healthierkitchen March 28, 2018
Today's decision by Rachael Ray, helps illustrate what's wrong with this review from yesterday. Ray gave respect to both books, understanding and explaining to us, the cookbook buyer, in what ways they are different and how each is worthy of purchasing. There too, a restaurant cookbook was pitted against a more writerly book. There too, the restaurant book won. In contrast to that review, in which we end up feeling that Ray thought long and hard about her decision, Jen Agg, grieving or no, seems to have made her decision after about 10 minutes of consideration of each book. She gave little respect to a book written by a long time culinary professional who is an expert in her field. Indeed, the section of her decision about Pho reads like a school book report written by a kid who'd rather be doing almost anything else. It seems to me that Agg was giving more respect to a fellow chef (yes, despite calling out the sexism inherent in that Night + Market was "blessed" by male reviewers, Agg picks the bro-y book over the more "staid" one by a woman). Each decision in the piglet is subjective; what rankles here is that it would have been nice for Agg to give a non-chef food professional more respect.
 
Homemaker D. March 28, 2018
What if this review had been written by a big name male chef? When women break the rules, they’re raked over the coals; when men do it, they’re celebrated. It’s a cookbook contest, and we all know the books are about more than just the recipes. Stop clutching your pearls. Great review, Jen Agg.
 
Sandra March 28, 2018
Sorry - I am a life long feminist in a male dominated profession and have broken more rules than You have probably lived long enough to. I don’t own pearls. The s was just st bad form and rule breaking for no reason. And sorry - my beloved mother died Sunday and I can still fulfill my obligations. Hear me roar. Yes - I am an old feminist. Learn from the original rule breakers.
 
Jesi N. March 28, 2018
I dunno, I think the Bill Buford review in 2015's final round serves as an answer to that (Buford is not a chef per se, but a big-name male writer who worked alongside a famous male chef). Getting cranky about reviewers not cooking/not cooking much is a proud, longstanding Piglet tradition! ;)
 
petalpusher April 2, 2018
'We all know' is such a lame attempt to disparage readers who disagree with you. Where are my pearls?
 
Sandra March 28, 2018
Yes Food 52 editors- did you agree to this in writing ahead of time? This is important for us to know. You need to chime on n here and set the record straight please.
 
Anita S. March 28, 2018
I immediately went to order Jen Agg's book after this review. She's totally right - a recipe book isn't just the sum of its parts (e.g. a bunch of recipes). It needs to come out at the end as more than the sum of its parts - and that's what makes it good, and that's why you don't have to really cook - you have to understand what IT IS you are cooking.
 
petalpusher April 2, 2018
What??! I have to understand what IT IS you are saying. That's the best BS I've read today.
 
Janet March 28, 2018
This is the sort of review that tells me nothing of the books, but speaks volumes about the reviewer. In this case, the volumes include pretension, the overwhelming desire to seem cool, and the ultimate conceit that the rules don't apply to her.
 
NT March 28, 2018
Amanda and Merrill, what are you thoughts about this? I am sure the food52 community wants know.
 
Sandra March 28, 2018
We’ll if Jenn Agg can judge cookbooks without cooking we can go to Amazon and judge her book without reading it. I can tell a good book by its cover and it’s author’s Twitterfeed. One-star. I can be a bitch too
 
maxvaliquette March 28, 2018
Your issue should be with Food52, who received a written proposal from Jen that she'd not cook from the books and review them this way and accepted her terms (in writing, also). You're punishing someone (which is shitty, period) for doing exactly what they said they would and exactly what Food52 agreed to?

And yes, cookbooks can absolutely be judged without cooking from them. That may not be how you judge them. There are reviewers here who cooked three recipes from each of their books. That's hardly a significant sample in a 200 recipe book.
 
Sandra March 28, 2018
Not punishing Jen any minute re than she punished the cookbook authors she reviewed. I am an avid reader - check out my Goodreads profile you want. I am totally capable of reviewing a book by reading the cover now yes, other reviews, the authors Twitterfeed. I don’t need to read every page of the book - what a prehistoric concept.
 
Amy T. March 28, 2018
I think this review is completely entertaining but ultimately it's a kobayashi-maru (sorry if you aren't a Star Trek geek like myself. Google it.) The reviewer changed the rules. Perhaps that was ok for the Food52 folks--heck, it's their contest and their prerogative--but I think it does a disservice to these two fine cookbooks which should have been judged like all the other cookbooks in this contest. And the readers get the short end too. I am loving all the comments and different perspectives which prove how much people love this contest.
 
fearlessem March 28, 2018
Her post on Twitter suggests she made it clear to the editors ahead of time that she wouldn't be cooking from the books... Giving credence to Antonia's theory this is intentional controversy-courting... Sigh...
 
fearlessem March 28, 2018
https://mobile.twitter.com/TheBlackHoof/status/978985481697456129?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet
 
Dana V. March 28, 2018
I was going to pop in with a comment about how a little controversy, like a dash of vinegar in a pot of beans, is sometimes the perfect seasoning. But as the negative comments pile up here, I suspect a closer analogy is that the F52 team, in tying to season the pot, inadvertently dumped in the whole bottle.
 
AntoniaJames March 28, 2018
As always, Dana V, you make me smile . . . . ;o)
 
cutthecarrot March 28, 2018
I enjoyed this review and look forward to reading Agg's memoir. Although I agree with a few people defending her approach that cookbooks are more than just recipes and that we can learn a lot without having to cook from them exhaustively, the reason I'm disappointed about this review is that knowing whether the recipes have consistency or work at a basic level is important especially if the they DON'T. Andrea Nguyen's pho book is focused, and it seems clear from previous reviews that the recipes work. I have no doubt that Night + Market is a great book and fun to read. I've been burned, though, and want more information. I've cooked from many cookbooks focused on restaurants in which the recipes aren't well tested, contain typos and weight inconsistencies, and are sometimes missing steps. In the case of these oversights, the book ceases to be a good book even if it's a great read or attractively designed. It'd be nice to know if the recipes in Night + Market are worth cooking.
 
Niknud March 28, 2018
Serves me right for not logging onto F52 for 2 days. Wow. Yah, I'm with most people here - this was a complete garbage review. Get that life happens, but that's where the editors come in. Bad call, folks.
 
Shalini March 27, 2018
Just....no! Jen, you are bringing shame on us Torontonians! Why the heck did you agree to do this and then 1) not follow the basic instruction of cooking a measly three dishes from the books, and 2) giving us a pseudo-review of ONE book based on thumbing through it?! Zap.

 
Shalini March 27, 2018
Just....no! Jen, you are bringing shame on us Toronto Ian's! Why the heck did you agree to do this and then 1) not follow the basic instruction of cooking a measly three dishes from the books, and 2) giving us a pseudo-review of ONE book based on thumbing through it?! Zap.
 
JennC March 27, 2018
A completely legitimate way to review the cookbooks. People like cookbooks for different reasons - and those people are somincludes the judges.
 
SGSF March 27, 2018
This review is ridiculous and frankly insulting to this not male, not young hipster, non-restaurant owning cook. Not sure I now understand the point of this judge-fest if cooking is not involved.
 
AntoniaJames March 27, 2018
My impression from years past is that the Piglet organizers really like and to some extent encourage controversy. There no doubt are various benefits to Food52, even when the majority of readers are put off by the judgment, the attitude, the Twitter feed, etc. of the judge and the Piglet staff (publicity / hype / increased traffic and "engagement" that plump up their metrics),
Just seeking to understand before seeking to be understood . . . . not saying that I like it. ;o)
 
SGSF March 27, 2018
Thanks for your perspective Antonia.
 
txchick57 March 28, 2018
Yep! I'm surprised it took someone this long to figure this out. This is a VC funded company and the endgame is to be bought out by someone like Huffpo or AOL. They need numbers for that. So - you get the clickbait titles on the home page and they drag this thing out for over a month. Duh.
 
jenniebgood April 1, 2018
Interesting Txchick57!
 
kcolwell March 27, 2018
Why did you let this person review the books if she wasn't going to cook from them? Any idiot can look at the pictures and make statements. As far as I'm concerned the final result is now skewed because this is not a fair review when put against the others. Poor Pho - you lose because your pictures are "staid". Talk about "turning to shit". What a waste of an opportunity for a real review. You can do better Food52. If you have rules then follow them.
 
Mchan March 27, 2018
What a lazy review. Food52 should have found a reviewer who was willing to make an effort.
 
Victoria C. March 27, 2018
I love this review. As I started to read, I began to laugh out loud. It was fun to read, so well written, and it gave me an insight into how Jen approaches cookbooks. How could I not like it? Plus, let’s face it – the girl has moxie!

I think there is valuable information here. Based on this review, I contacted a friend and suggested she check out Night + Market, which I think she will enjoy - especially the part about what is good to drink with Thai food. Not necessarily Singha. It turns out wine, and it doesn’t sound like the usual suspects.

I have plenty of cookbooks I have not cooked one recipe from but have still learned a lot from simply by spending time with them, reading, perusing, kind of hanging out with them. In fact, Bravetart is one of them, and I think it’s a great book, even if I will never make a homemade Oreo, Fig Newton, or Nutter Butter. I have already learned a lot from it – hooray for 3-inch cake pans and, duh, why didn’t it occur to me before that a deep ANODIZED aluminum 9 x 13-inch pan would be perfect for tomato-based lasagna?

And how many books have I cooked just one recipe from and then added it to my repertoire? Many. There’s a vaguely Hungarian dish in a Delia Smith book that is delicious. I can make it early in the day; it improves with age; and everyone loves it, especially if I make linzertorte for dessert (Craig Claiborne’s recipe with Alice Medrich’s method). It’s a go-to party dish for me. Same with a recipe for Crabmeat Mandeville (appetizer) and Shrimp Creole (main) from a New Orleans cookbook that have been standard dinner party fare at my house for years. I am sure each of these books has a lot more recipes that I would like if I tried them, but for whatever reason I have not, and I am okay with that.

My cookbook collection is large, and I select new additions carefully. I often spend a lot of time physically looking a book over before I buy it. I rely mostly on my own impression of the book – more than reviews, which interest me, guide me, but rarely sway me away from an opinion I have already made. And my track record is good. I can’t think of the last book I actually had in my hands before I purchased it that I ended up not liking.

These days I spend a lot of time reading articles and following news that I think is important for me to know but upsets me. I come to The Piglet for a little light-hearted relief and entertainment, and that’s what I usually get. Today was no exception.
 
LLStone March 27, 2018
Exactly!
 
emmasw March 27, 2018
You had me at moxie.
 
emcap March 27, 2018
This review would have been ok as an intro. I like when the reviewers know more about the context a book than I do. Ms. Agg has eaten at the companion restaurant and knows the bigger picture. What I could not get over was that Ms. Agg is a chef and restauranteur who made it in a man's world yet she is so dismissive of Andrea Nguyen -"it's all pho all the time". No shit, it's called the Pho cookbook. Did I really need to read a review for that piece of genius?
Instead Ms. Agg opts for the "cool dude book." This choice would have been fine had she actually cooked from the books. She would have been able to justify her choice as more than style over substance. It would have been a review worth reading. It was not. With that I'm dismissing her and re-reading the Geller and Benwick reviews.
 
willowp March 27, 2018
My thoughts exactly
 
Pamela T. March 27, 2018
Every year I look forward to the Piglet. I agree with most everyone else this review didn't do either book any favors. I have them both and they deserved far better than Agg's review. Really makes me wonder how Food 52 thought it was a good idea to publish this.
 
stefanie March 27, 2018
Just thinking about this from a cookbook author's standpoint, they must put so much time and effort into choosing, then testing and proof-reading recipes...if I wrote a cookbook, I'd be pretty dissatisfied that my book lost out to another not on the merits of the recipes presented, but because my writing style wasn't "fun" enough and was too "staid" for the reviewer's tastes.
 
maxvaliquette March 27, 2018
Another way to look at this: Jen cooked three fewer dishes from each book than did other reviewers. I get that there are rules, but judging a cookbook based on having tried one per cent of the recipes seems about one per cent more instructive than none at all. Aren't most of these reviews at least 95% armchair, anyway?
 
alygator March 27, 2018
I was optimistic that even though she had "no plans" to cook from either book that she would actually be inspired to cook in the end. No such luck. This is the worst Piglet review I have ever read. My guess is the big wait for Round 2 was due to the editors scrambling how to handle this mess.
 
Jesse F. March 27, 2018
This review is like judging an airline based on the content of the inflight magazine.
Ms. Agg and supporters, you're right that many people read but don't cook from cookbooks. I encourage you to start a separate tournament to review cookbooks under that guise. Perhaps you can call it The Armchair.
 
Rhonda35 March 27, 2018
So, the takeaway I get from this "review" is two-fold. (1) Readers, if you want to know how useful these books will be to you, you're going to have to try them out yourselves because Agg is not able to follow through on her commitments. And, (2) Agg is an attention-seeker who likes to create controversy for controversy's sake. Look at her Twitter feed to see how hard she tries to be edgy and "cool." She is eating up all of these comments because, for a few fleeting hours, her lame review has people talking about her. #sad
 
AntoniaJames March 27, 2018
Deborah and Rhonda, alas, what you say is so true, as we witness (of all places) here, the unfortunate trend, fueled every day by certain public figures, of disruption via rudeness, disrespect and bullying. I come to this site for a respite from that.
Are we being "oh so serious," as described in a mocking, disparaging tone in the Twitter feed? Perhaps. I suspect, however, that I'm not the only one here who is troubled by the pervasive disrespect and self-centeredness that seems to be making inroads into our culture. ;o)
 
nextdoor March 27, 2018
This reviewer/judge ignored the Piglet request that three recipes are prepared from each book. The review was insulting and unpleasant.
It reminded of adolescent bullies who make fun of anything good or gentle.
 
mainecook61 March 27, 2018
Time to retire this "contest." The setup--odd book pairings, celeb judges, lazy reviews--suggests that it's all a joke. The reader responses, as well the well-written reviews, say that people are eager to find out about new cookbooks, whether it's to cook from them or simply to be transported to another time and place. I say the joke has gotten old. However there is clearly a readership for well-written reviews, just as there would be for any book, whether it contained recipes or not.
 
Alexandra H. March 27, 2018
What a disappointing review! After reading it, sadly, I feel learned more about Night + Market Song ‘the restaurant’ than I did about either of the cookbooks in question. “Pho” is such an exceptionally well written, well researched, informative (and lively!) book that this judging seems like a terrible disservice to the author and her book. By the way, “Pho” is not “just” pho recipes—some of my favorite recipes from “Pho” are for salads and sides at the back of the book. I also disagree with the judge’s “tongue in cheek” comment: I purchase cookbooks as learning tools and cooking manuals, not for laughs. While I understand that after years of professional cooking, one can ‘taste’ recipes just by reading them, we take our Piglet seriously, and no recipe testing/cooking at this stage of judging is inexcusable. Rematch, please!
 
Valhalla March 27, 2018
The comment about being too damn old is more than annoying also. I'm sorry my eyes fail with age, as yours will too, sweetie. More cookbook editors should actually pay attention to such things like typography and graphic design, since the people who buy cookbooks are often, gasp, old!
 
AntoniaJames March 27, 2018
Thank you, Valhalla, for mentioning that. My reaction to it was "Ouch!" I don't buy the Food52 cookbooks any more due to their extensive use of light black type on taupe / saturated grey pages.

And it's not just an age problem . . . . many people - I'm one of them - with correctable severely impaired vision have trouble with such low contrast. Those books would have been just as difficult to read when I was much younger. And please don't get me started on the very light gray font that often appears in the longer articles on the site. I've asked the staff several times whether the site is ADA compliant, but alas, radio silence every time. ;o)
 
Ronni L. March 30, 2018
Ah, the gratuitous snark at old age. Here's the thing, Jen: Someday you'll be as old as I am. Or not. Either way, I win.
 
AntoniaJames April 5, 2018
cookbookchick, if you have trouble reading the light grey font on the site, or the impossible-to-read very pale grey font in the newsletters sent by Food52, and if you're using Chrome, you can add on to Chrome an extension that lets you select "high contrast," which helps quite a bit: https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/high-contrast/djcfdncoelnlbldjfhinnjlhdjlikmph?utm_source=chrome-ntp-icon It makes the interface a bit grainy, but at least you can read the text! Also, if there are pages without the light grey font, you can simply turn the feature off by clicking on the drop down menu from the icon that appears on the far right of your bar at the top, when installed. Of course, it doesn't do anything for the fine black typeface on medium to full saturation grey pages in the cookbooks . . . . . I'd love for someone to help me understand why publishers just not care about our demographic. ;o) P.S. I do hope the Food52 team reads and makes a note of this workaround so they can actually answer any inquiries they receive from users who have this problem. (I've received not so much as the courtesy of an acknowledgement to any of my messages asking about this, much less a reply.)
 
Judy March 27, 2018
I’m not a PR professional, but I would advise Food52 to get ahead of this unfortunate review. It really is not good for the beloved Piglet.
 
txchick57 March 27, 2018
the whole site exists now just to sell overpriced products. I've copied and emailed all my saved recipes, some of which are amazing, because I expect it to disappear at some point.
 
CathyWeaver March 27, 2018
This review is so bad it would be funny of it weren't so narrow minded and disrespectful. Piglet should have a bracket for the reviews. Here is a quote from my favorite review, by Brett Martin: 'In his introduction to Nosrat’s book, Michael Pollan puts a fine point on it: “A well-written and thoroughly tested recipe might tell you how to produce the dish in question, but it won’t teach you anything about how to cook, not really. Truth be told, recipes are infantilizing.'

Truth be told, this is bullshit." I don't have the book that won but I've learned a lot from Pho and all of Andrea's books. I live in the middle of nowhere with no really good Vietnamese food within an hour's drive, and I love that I can make my own excellent rice noodle rolls, Viet sate sauce, all kinds of pho, the list goes on and on. I cook excellent food without recipes, and I improvise all the time when I do use recipes but I would never have figured out how to make all the things I make without learning from recipes.
 
alaparc March 27, 2018
The reviewer states at the outset that she had no intention of cooking from the cookbook, regardless of extenuating circumstances. We don't know why the editors weren't notified or if the editors did not follow up. I am just going to chalk this one up. BTW, I do not feel that the reviewer is a discerning snob without pretension. And I get that feeling by 'just reading' her review.
 
AntoniaJames March 27, 2018
Next time a judge just dials-it in like this, Editors, please give me a call. I'll be happy to clear my calendar, even on short notice, to fill in. You won't get a celebrity by-line but you would, at least, get a thoughtful review, thus preserving the integrity and "brand" of the Piglet. Heck, I'd even find and team up with a better-known Bay Area food authority to co-write the review, if you preferred. ;o)
 
Rhonda35 March 27, 2018
AntoniaJames, you know you're a celebrity here on Food52! ;-)
 
louisez March 27, 2018
I'd gladly read anything written by A J

 
AntoniaJames March 27, 2018
You all are way too kind. Actually, I've suggested several times that the Piglet team let us (Food52 faithful) organize our own "Shadow" Piglet. The organizer -- I volunteer! - would get the brackets when they're established for the primary Piglet, and Food52 would have the publishers send the cookbooks out to the community volunteer reviewers for the first round. I'd handle the logistics of providing cookbooks for the subsequent round reviewers, and I along with others helping me organize would edit judgments. We'd do alternate days, or weeks with the regular Piglet. The judges would all be members of the community!
That said, I'm tempted to go ahead and do my own judging and reviewing of this pair. I've put holds on both cookbooks at the library, but probably won't have the books in hand for a week or two.
Stay tuned . . . . . ;o)
If I can swing it (alas, I'm at the mercy of my clients, but it's a small price to pay for the extraordinary benefits of owning one's own business) I'll post my review / judgment in a comment to this thread. ;o)
 
PhillipBrandon March 27, 2018
You see, the proper (gulp?) *hipster* method of cookbook reviewing is not to cook from them, but be sure to imply casual misogyny. You've probably never heard of it...
 
Rhonda35 March 27, 2018
Exactly!
 
362Heather March 27, 2018
While I feel very badly for the judge in her time of difficulty... Death is awful to deal with. I do not think that she had any intent of publishing a helpful, insightful, or appropriate review in even the best of circumstances. She appears to be an egregious self-promoter with little regard for anything other than herself. In fact, she probably loves the comments board blowing up, because she sees this as a way for her to drive more attention to herself. The Piglet is about community, helping home cooks find wonderful recipes they can share and about driving traffic to great and at times unknown cookbooks. This judge could clearly care less about any of that. When the editors received this review, they should have immediately found a replacement. Why was this judge allowed to promote BOTH her restaurant and her book (which for those who've looked, has subpar reviews on goodreads)? Though I suppose we shouldn't even be talking about the judge. The shame belongs to Food52. Ultimately, they were the ones who chose to publish this unhelpful (best thing I can say about it) review.

Also, I AGREE... Bring a zombie round into the piglet this year and every year!!!
 
Erin A. March 27, 2018
I'm not disappointed that she didn't cook from these, but only because I never had any intention to, either. I live somewhere with close to zero access to Vietnamese and Thai ingredients, and had no illusions that I would ever interact with these books beyond skimming them for some cultural insight. How many of you were really going to become "faww" experts?
 
Valhalla March 27, 2018
Pho really does not require any special ingredients other than a reasonable spice collection.
 
alygator March 27, 2018
I bought Pho based upon the Round 1 review and it is a very usable book. I will be happy to cook from it!
 
Tippy C. March 27, 2018
Whew...talk about judging a book by its cover. I realize that this contest is supposed to be in fun, and certainly nobody expects it to be the slightest bit objective, but this particular review seems about as on-point as if someone just threw both books down the stairs and chose the one that bounced farthest.
 
witloof March 27, 2018
That made me laugh out loud.
 
Rhonda35 March 27, 2018
Hilarious!
 
Lynne E. March 27, 2018
Worst. Review. Ever.
 
SandraH March 27, 2018
Too bad, a disappointing review.
 
Kimberly S. March 27, 2018
What is happening?!?! This is round 2! What a joke and you are making The Piglet irrelevant. Cooking from the books is why judges agree to do this if they can’t do that then it was your responsibility to ask someone else.
 
TheFritschKitchen March 27, 2018
What a sad review - as echoed below, this was a pathetic article, obviously written in the 10 minutes before it was due to be submitted. However, the part that bothers me the most is including a link to Agg's book. Really? That's just tacky - obviously she wrote the review just to throw a link in to promote herself (It doesn't even really make sense to have a link to her book there, she obviously just tried to fit it in somehow for cheap, crappy marketing) Come on editors! Agg's review is terrible, but it is what it is. Including a link (Be honest now too - is it affiliated??) is completely on you. Alas, it looks like the Piglet has finally sold out.
 
Amy March 27, 2018
What? What??? I will say that I give a LOT of leeway. This competition isn't my job, etc, etc, but come on. Flipping through the book just doesn't cut it. With that said, the tone of the editor's note does sound like they got stuck with this, knew it was going to piss people off, but had nothing else to run with. If that's the case, that sucks. Better luck next year, editors - make sure your judges are actually going to cook!
 
Ann P. March 27, 2018
I thought the same thing about the editor's note.
 
NT March 27, 2018
Horrible judgement. To be fair and respectful to both cookbooks, a do-over is necessaary.
 
Jesi N. March 27, 2018
I wonder if this decision was part of the reason for last week's hiatus. The editors were fairly vague about the reason for the delay ("We're getting round two ready as quickly as we can, but do need just a little more time"); maybe they were trying to work with the judge during that time to beef up the review. *shrugs* They must have known what kind of response this review would elicit, and I can't imagine they'd release this just for kicks.
 
Melina March 27, 2018
That was petulant and in full attack mode! However, it wasn't a review or in the spirit of the Piglet. I agree with those who say the editors were hijacked by this diatribe, the intro rather suggests as much. Most of all, I feel that the two authors were wronged, after all the work and creativity and love they expended they must feel terribly offended. This felt like an act of vandalism.
 
MC March 27, 2018
Seriously Food52?? Tim Gunn barely followed a recipe from Bangkok and now there's a judge who couldn't be bothered to COOK? Round Two of the Piglet needs a do-over! This is really really disappointing and the pretentious condescending attitude of the judge is horrible.
 
LittleKi March 27, 2018
OK, even if we suspend the rules, I'm still not sure about the basis for this decision. Night + Market won because it was a restaurant similar to hers? I don't mind what other people consider to be bad reviews - when the person may not be the best judge in the world but gives in a good go, is honest about their experience with the books, and finds some way to muddle through. This falls flat.
 
Susan W. March 27, 2018
You have got to be kidding me....
 
Krista March 27, 2018
The review was unfortunate and now I certainly won't be reading the reviewer's book. But I don't blame the editors - she probably asked for an extension and turned it in late. Their up-front note shows that they told her in advance what they expected of her. I think they've tried hard to improve the contest after last year's fiasco.
 
Jesi N. March 27, 2018
Agreed. The editor's note sounded a lot like a disclaimer ("we made our expectations clear, but this is what we got").
 
Hope March 27, 2018
Calling for a do-over. The poor attitude and weird ramblings rolls off of her like the stench from a rotting potato. Find someone else to do these two wonderful books justice and do it over. Neither one deserves such short shrift, especially if she had no intention of doing her part for this.
 
Jane March 27, 2018
I’m not really attached to either cookbook but I say Pho gets an automatic bid to the Zombie round (oh wait that’s the Rooster TOB) because of its unfair judgement process. It never had a chance. I’d be outraged if I were the author.
 
Jesi N. March 27, 2018
Shoutout to a fellow ToB'er! I do wish The Piglet had a zombie round. Looks like they had something similar for the first couple years, but I'm guessing it was too complicated to pull off.
 
MRinSF March 27, 2018
Yes, yes! I'm also a ToB fan and often reflect each year on the top-notch quality of their reviews, from serious readers and serious writers. Though I understand that these contests are done all in good fun, The Rooster extends a lot more courtesy and respect to the works chosen, the reviews written, and the contest as a whole. The Rooster is organized and professional while still giving plenty of space for individual style and personality to shine through everywhere. And they still have a damn good time.
 
SweetM March 27, 2018
How is this review even valid in this competition?! Should the NCAA March Madness just pick winners based on stats and the players uniforms....
 
Jordan March 27, 2018
Why in the world would the F52 editors ask the reviewer to take part in this, let alone not ask someone else to step in when it became clear that she wasn't able to fulfill her duties as a judge? It's a shame that some judges don't take this seriously, and this is maybe the most egregious example I can think of in all the years of the competition. What a joke.
 
Ann P. March 27, 2018
What the hell.
 
SweetM March 27, 2018
you read my mind!
 
Jesi N. March 27, 2018
I'm pretty willing to roll with whatever the Piglet throws at me, but... yeah, I wish she'd cooked something. That's part of what makes this fun: judges cook through the books so I don't have to. I, too, can browse through the books and decide which one appeals to me more, but I do kinda want to know if the recipes work or not.

Neither of these books was particularly close to my heart, though, so at least I didn't have to see one of my favorites go out this way.
 
Kim March 27, 2018
This is a really disappointing review. I get having extenuating circumstances (and I'd like express my sympathy for the passing of the writer's father) but it sounds like she wasn't going to cook from the cookbooks even if life was going smoothly and predictably. If you aren't going to cook from cookbooks for a cookbook competition... why agree to participate?
 
cindy March 27, 2018
I could not follow this review at all. How could she just chose a book by its cover.
 
Sandra March 27, 2018
These books deserve a rematch from a competent reviewer who will agree to the rules. Maybe this reviewer should check out the Code of Conduct. The authors of these books should be outraged.
 
aixpat March 27, 2018
This review kind of distills why I don't read Food52 very much anymore: the site feels so enamored of the rich and/or stylish and there's less and less practical information for home cooks.
 
Kim March 27, 2018
YES. I agree totally! And it makes me sad - I loved Food52, but I've stopped following it (except for the Piglet - although reviews like this make me not interested even in that).
 
Kristina T. March 27, 2018
join the food 52 cookbook club! full of great info from home cooks who cook through the books. I love it.
 
klclark March 27, 2018
The review reads like a high school book report. The last line says it all "a friendly reminder that you probably shouldn’t invest too much ego in something that turns to shit so fast." I intrepret this to say "I'm too good and too busy to do this."
 
Peppa March 27, 2018
Is it April Fools Day already? Because this review is a joke.
 
Susan W. March 27, 2018
Got that right!
 
elizabethann1211 March 27, 2018
I just wish that if she had no intention of cooking from the books, she had just passed on the opportunity. I didn't bother reading the rest of her review--what's the point? What a disappointment after a great first round!
 
Pam H. March 27, 2018
Call me a discerning snob who is somehow completely without pretension, but so far I'm underwhelmed by Round Two!
 
Joan O. March 27, 2018
I agree with others if you aren't going to cook from the books then don't be a judge. So sad.
 
Cathy B. March 27, 2018
I don't have a strong feeling about either of these cookbooks. They both seem worthy. But the recipes are where the rubber meets the road! If she had no intention of cooking from these books, she shouldn't have agreed to take part in this. There is no doubt in my mind that Night + Market is a more engaging read and has more of a point of view. If this book is just a marketing piece for their brick and mortar restaurant, then I'll borrow it from the library and give it a read. But can I cook good food from it? Will I learn something new from its techniques and ideas? That's how I know if it's worth buying.
 
creamtea March 27, 2018
They're COOKbooks. Hint: you COOK from them.
 
Girlfromipanema March 27, 2018
I understand that there were extenuating circumstances preventing the reviewer from cooking, and I place no blame on her, but it comes off as if Food52 editors completely lack agency in the Piglet process. Why not step in and have the test-kitchen cook some of the recipes if your reviewer is not able to? Or a reader. Some things on this site come off as so haphazard, and this is one of them.
 
luvcookbooks March 27, 2018
Not helpful.
 
Lissa March 27, 2018
I guess I’m confused about why someone would agree to be a judge if they never had any intention of following “the rules “. I don’t find this indifference refreshing. I find it to be exceptionally self -centered. Just take a pass next time so that you will have the time to do what you enjoy doing. I’m not trying to be mean spirited. Just honest. I am sorry for her loss. (yes, I agree that personal loss is far more important than a cookbook review contest).
 
jksfgc March 27, 2018
If you don't cook from cookbooks, don't be a Piglet judge. Simple as that. Disappointed in you, Food 52 editors!
 
zerosummer March 27, 2018
I am a pretty openminded Piglet fan, and I love the reviews from professional chefs and kitchen newbies alike because I enjoy reading about how all kinds of people interact with cookbooks. I appreciate reading about how this reviewer interacts with cookbooks as well, and it sounds like there were a lot of extenuating circumstances that prevented her from cooking the required 3 recipes from each book. It feels awfully unfair to both books to be missing this essential part of the review, though, and I wish this assignment could have been given to another reviewer who could have completed the required tasks.
 
FJT March 27, 2018
Well, it was clear she was going to pick Night + Market as she hardly wrote about the other book at all. A very unsatisying judgement from my perspective. I agree with other commenters that it’s the experience the judges have of cooking from the cookbooks they’re reviewing that is most useful and interesting.
 
James F. March 27, 2018
Also, keep updating the bracket!
https://food52.com/the-piglet/2018/bracket
 
James F. March 27, 2018
I see there's a fashion of judges who who won't cook from the books, cook from the books as little as possible, or don't follow the recipes. And there are commentators who like those reviews because either they don't cook much, they don't have the suppliers to follow the recipes or have the time to, or mainly enjoy the voice of the reviewers. I cook a lot at home, and value reviewers who take the time to cook the recipes, and give practical insight into whether or not the recipes work like they claim. It's my main decider on if I should pick up the book. And if I had had no intent on picking up the book, it lets me vicariously have a test run with them - sometimes it changes my mind to buy to it. That's really why I follow the Piglet.
 
txchick57 March 27, 2018
This was just a contest to see who's going to lose to Bravetart next. Meh
 
Solveig M. March 27, 2018
I don't have a preference for either book, but I'm a bit disappointed that the judge didn't cook from them. Its really the reviews of the dishes that makes the piglet stand out, I think.
 
Zoe R. March 27, 2018
Sad to see Pho knocked out but at the same time excited to see Night Market advance! I already have (and love) the Pho Cookbook and I'm sure I will wind up picking up Night Market any day now!