The Piglet2013 / Quarterfinal Round, 2013

Humphry Slocombe Ice Cream Book

Humphry Slocombe Ice Cream Book

Jake Godby, Sean Vahey, and Paolo Lucchesi

Get the Book

Bouchon Bakery Cookbook

Bouchon Bakery Cookbook

Thomas Keller and Sebastien Rouxel

Get the Book

Judged by: James Oseland

James Oseland is the editor-in-chief of Saveur, America’s most critically acclaimed food magazine. Under his editorship, the magazine has won more than 35 awards, including numerous James Beard journalism awards, and two from the American Society of Magazine Editors. His 2006 book, Cradle of Flavor, a memoir with recipes about his time living in Southeast Asia, was named one of the best books of that year by Time Asia, the New York Times, and Good Morning America. He is also a judge on Bravo's Top Chef Masters. James has lived in India and Indonesia and now resides in New York City with his husband, Daniel, and his cat, Sam. 

The Judgment

Bouchon Bakery and Humphry Slocombe Ice Cream Book. Could there be two, um, more challenging cookbooks for me to judge? I’m a dedicated home cook -- I make dinner every night (okay, at least I strive to), I spend most weekends in my kitchen -- but there are certain foods I always, always outsource to the pros. Baked goods and ice creams top that list. My kind of cooking, the kind that I naturally gravitate toward, is savory and spontaneous -- a pinch of this, a sploosh of that. At least in terms of baked goods and ice creams, it would take the guidance of a very special cookbook for the fruits of my at-home labors to turn out better than what I could easily buy elsewhere. 

Thus, it was with grim determination that I approached the Humphry book. All right, I confess: I appreciate any cookbook with photos of actual drag queens in it (see page 124 for an account of something called the “Tranny Smackdown,” an event co-sponsored by Humphry Slocombe, the celebrated San Francisco ice cream shop whose recipes birthed this book), but that sort of whimsy gets a nervous cook only so far. Still, from outward appearances, the book made a good case for itself -- at the very least as a record of a very particular facet in our current gastronomic culture. With Humphry Slocombe, the shop, known for its beyond-oddball ice cream flavors, the book does double duty as a recipe guide and as an atlas of the culinary absurd, with how-tos for flavors such as “Red Hot” Banana (appealing sounding, made with the cinnamon candies) and Strawberry Black Olive (not so appealing sounding, but, hey, never say never).

I don’t own an ice cream maker; in fact, the only time I’d made ice cream before was when I was 12 years old. My dad, an office products salesman, had received an ice cream maker as an end-of-year gift from a client. Our first interaction with the machine was also our last: we churned out a batch of what was allegedly strawberry swirl but in actuality was cement with hard chunks of berries that you could’ve hurt someone with. So I turned to the Saveur test kitchen for help. Judy Haubert, associate kitchen director, and I made two recipes from the book: Tahitian Vanilla as a control, and the vaguely gruesome-sounding Government Cheese as a test of the book’s transgressiveness. 

Making the ice creams was pretty straightforward: we started with a custardy base and added flavorings from there. The results were pretty good. The vanilla had a high-fat richness and a real depth of flavor (though it was seriously salty; even five minutes after taking a bite my throat hurt from its saline intensity); the Government Cheese was rich and sweetly savory, only fleetingly cheesy, with a pleasantly autumnal tone from dashes of cinnamon and cayenne. The textures were mighty fine, too. Even after a few days' time sitting in the freezer, the ice creams stayed creamy and scoopable, with none of the angry, hard-brick texture that besets lesser takes on the dessert once they leave the ice cream maker. 

If I’m not an ice cream maker, I’m even less a baker. But from the very moment I opened Bouchon Bakery I was inspired and informed. The book is the fifth in Thomas Keller’s unofficial series of cookbooks that also serve as coffee-table books -- they’re gorgeous, with expansive trim size and glossy pages that seem unlikely ever to be batter splattered or sauce stained. That’s not to say they’re not designed to be cooked from -- they are, and the recipes are written with an almost self-parodying degree of precision. But of all Keller’s books (up to and including Under Pressure, his ode to sous vide cookery), Bouchon Bakery is the one that, to me, seems the least easy to cook from. The madeleines, the macarons, the croissants—this is a joke, right? You want me to make croissants? 

And yet somehow Bouchon Bakery made me feel I could. Or maybe I could. As I flipped through the massive glossy pages, paralyzing doubt grew inside me. Deciding what to make was an extreme process of elimination. Okay, not the croissants, that holy grail of pastry. English muffins were appealing but maybe too prosaic. I found middle ground with the bacon-cheddar scones. I lined up my ingredients and got to work. 

Keller and his co-authors have become famous for the strident attention to detail they bring to their recipes, and that perfectionism was immediately and obviously on display here. But there was also maddening inconsistency to all the micromanaging. One can’t just use any bacon here: It should be “Hobbs applewood-smoked bacon, cooked, drained, and cut into 1/8-inch pieces (77 grams cooked weight).” But the subsequent ingredient is merely listed as 2 cups of “grated white cheddar cheese”—and that's it. How sharp should that cheese be? How big should the holes on my grater be? 

Still, while the scones didn’t exactly turn out as tender as promised (the texture was more like a very moist dog biscuit), the taste was incredible, the flavors absolutely perfect. I now worship at the feet of these bacon-cheddar scones. And I will never, ever make them again -- I’ll just go to Bouchon Bakery a little more often than before and buy them. (To be fair, I also made an olive oil cake from Bouchon Bakery, and it was quite good in both flavor and execution.)

At the end of the day, making a judgment between the Bouchon Bakery and the Humphry Slocombe books was, like most things in life, slightly complicated. Both of them are the cookbookizations of popular food shops, whose wares are the sorts of things we (or at least I) don’t usually tend to make at home. They also fit into a larger cultural story, one that now slots “publish a cookbook” somewhere between “get written up on Eater” and “open a branch in Toronto” in the standard growth trajectory of hip, high-quality, media- and tourist-friendly restaurants and purveyors. 

So if everyone is putting out a cookbook -- and lately it feels like everyone is -- it becomes especially important for your cookbook to matter, for it to compellingly make the case for its own existence. In one way or another, the food I made from both books turned out acceptable enough. But cookbooks are about far more than cooking these days: they’re about marketing. With its hip affectations and faux-distressed pages, Humphry feels very much of this moment, an amusing and illustrative artifact of 2012. But Bouchon Bakery feels timeless. It’s a record not just of a place and time but of an entire philosophy of baking. If Humphry Slocombe is a sharp, smart, funny YouTube clip, then Bouchon Bakery -- in its overall packaging, its exacting qualities, its occasional contradictions -- is a Paul Thomas Anderson film. Bouchon Bakery deserves the Piglet.

And the winner is…

Bouchon Bakery Cookbook

Bouchon Bakery Cookbook

Get the Book

Do you Agree?


BoulderGalinTokyo February 26, 2013
Thank you for a very thoughtful review!
luvcookbooks February 24, 2013
Loved the approach to the books and the cooking ... makes me want to buy Bouchon for the scone recipe alone. Already have the Humphry Slocombe book and now feel I could attempt one of the outrageous sounding recipes with confidence that the results will be edible, possibly delish. Such a carefully thought out review with great attention to cultural context. Thanks!
christine H. February 20, 2013
This was a really astute analysis of the current state of cookbook publishing -- excellent review!
The F. February 20, 2013
Great review!
SweetM February 19, 2013
Well written and thoughtful review. Thank you!
Tania P. February 19, 2013
Weighing, as opposed to measuring has changed the way I bake. For starters, once you have a digital scale with a tare button, its SO much easier, less mess and dishes to wash up afterwards and 100pc foolproof results. I ADORE the Bouchon Bakery cook book - top 5 cook books of all time for me. The Palet d'Or is a show stopper!
jeanmarieok February 22, 2013
I agree that weighing is so important in baking, and something I only came to do consistantly in the last couple of years. It has improved the quality of my baking SO much. I am only commenting here to hopefully push anyone who is on the fence about it to just do it, already!
ATG117 February 18, 2013
This may be my favorite review yet, though I've thoroughly enjoyed them all. I appreciated how James really weighed the pros and cons of both books, and ultimately put his choice in context. How true is it that today cookbooks are about far more than cooking.
lbgirl February 18, 2013
If you remember that our grandmothers and great-grandmothers used teacups and kitchen spoons to measure their ingredients, rather than weighing them precisely, baking becomes a lot less intimidating. Yes, there might be some slight variance from one occasion to the next, but I don't get the sense that their baked goods completely "failed" any more than ours do today.
ElizaB February 18, 2013
I just bought The Bouchon Bakery cookbook and it looks incredible. I have had the Humphrey Slocombe book for about 4 months, have made three recipes from it, and each and every one was inedible. I'm excited to try a more researched and better written book out. Also its just so pretty and big and inspiring and funny in a classic way.
fiveandspice February 18, 2013
I find it oddly pleasing to know that the editor-in-chief of Saveur is mildly uncomfortable with precision cooking. That makes for good company. The review, also very pleasing. I love how each book was really given a fair shake (in spite of the low comfort level) and the final decision was so thoroughly reasoned.
dymnyno February 18, 2013
On Saturday Thomas cooked in my kitchen for a special event. He left me a box of assorted pastries from Bouchon Bakery which included the bacon was incredible!
CarlaCooks February 19, 2013
Oh my gods, you lucky lady!
Michelle@HummingbirdHigh February 18, 2013
This doesn't seem like a fair fight. Humphrey Slocombe is a great cookbook... but just for ice creams. Bouchon Bakery, another great cookbook, covers a wide range of baked goods, from croissants to tarts to whatever dessert you might fancy. Of course Bouchon was going to win. A fairer fight would be Humphrey Slocombe vs. Bi-Rite Creamery's Ice Cream cookbook. Yeesh.
Kenzi W. February 18, 2013
Totally understand. Take a look at how this tournament works, though, here: Thanks for stopping by!
Naomi M. February 18, 2013
Great review! Very enjoyable and well written/ judged! I must try those scones....soon!
Bevi February 18, 2013
As a raised and confirmed splooshy cooker I too appreciate Oseland's approach in the kitchen. But I agree that Keller's books belong on the shelf with other timeless cookbooks. Great review!
healthierkitchen February 18, 2013
What a well reasoned and well written decision! I, too, am more comfortable with savory, splooshy cooking (love that word!) so I read along with great interest as Mr. Oseland stepped outside his cooking comfort zone. What a wonderful last couple of paragraphs!